Same-sex marriage in District narrowly upheld by D.C. Court of Appeals

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 16, 2010 4:02 AM GMT
    "The D.C. Court of Appeals narrowly sustained same-sex marriage in the District in a 5 to 4 vote Thursday.

    This Story
    Same-sex marriage in D.C. is upheld
    Gays' new opportunity stirs up old conflicts
    Saying 'I do' to history in D.C.
    Q&A, Transcript: Gay marriage in the District
    For District, wedding bells ring ka-ching
    First same-sex weddings celebrated in D.C.
    D.C. gay couple caps a momentous first by tying the knot
    Gay marriage dawns in D.C.: Share your wedding photos
    Uncle Sam has no wedding gift for this couple
    D.C. same-sex marriage law takes effect
    Gay marriage dawns in D.C.
    Weddings: Real-life love stories
    D.C. Same-sex marriage law: For local event planner, a perfect match
    Giving gays their due as first-class citizens
    For gays, a D.C. day to treasure
    Wedding bells sound climax of long fight
    View All Items in This Story
    View Only Top Items in This Story
    The nine judges were asked to determine whether the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics acted lawfully when it rejected an initiative by opponents of gay marriage to have the matter voted upon in a referendum. The D.C. Council approved same-sex marriage in December.

    A D.C. Superior Court judge upheld the board's decision in January, and the bill became law in March.

    In May, attorneys for opponents of same-sex marriage -- led by Bishop Harry Jackson, pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville who has a D.C. residence -- argued before the nine appellate judges that the board's decision violated the District's Human Rights Act and that the council had overstepped its authority.

    In an 81-page decision released Thursday, the five affirming judges -- Phyllis D. Thompson, Vanessa Ruiz, Inez Smith Reid, Noel Anketell Kramer and Anna Blackburne-Rigsby -- disagreed with that argument, saying that the board was within the law in making such a decision.

    "The judges said they were convinced that the council would not have authorized "any initiative" that would have discriminated against residents and violated the Human Rights Act. The judges also wrote that the board "correctly determined that the proposed initiative would have the effect of authorizing such discrimination."

    The judges further stated that the council "was not obliged to allow initiatives that would have the effect of authorizing discrimination prohibited by the Human Rights Act to be put to voters, and then to repeal them, or to wait for them to be challenged as having been improper subjects of initiative, should they be approved by voters."

    Based on that conclusion, the judges ruled that the board acted lawfully in refusing to accept the Jackson initiative.

    Peter D. Rosenstein, a gay and lesbian rights activist, hailed the ruling as a "victory for decency and civil and human rights."

    Because all nine judges heard the case, Jackson's attorneys have no further course of appeal unless they take their case to the U.S. Supreme Court and the justices choose to hear it. After the ruling, Jackson said he and his attorneys are planning such an appeal. ... "

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/15/AR2010071503618.html?hpid=moreheadlines


  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 16, 2010 5:19 AM GMT
    Yay for DC! icon_smile.gif

    I have much more to say but I think that simple phrase is enough to sum up my feelings!!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 16, 2010 5:25 AM GMT
    ZbmwM5 saidYay for DC! icon_smile.gif

    I have much more to say but I think that simple phrase is enough to sum up my feelings!!!


    I'd also like to add a "Woot".

    I wonder how the US Supreme Court would handle a case (if one arose) that dealt with rights in an entity that is not a state? Would they try to ensure that it could not be used as precedent for state arguments or would they let it have effect?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 16, 2010 5:27 AM GMT
    funny-pictures-kitten-has-a-happy.jpg