Fair and Balanced Fox News

  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Jul 21, 2010 8:43 PM GMT
    What has to be realized about Fox News is that it is the propaganda wing of the Conservative Republican party.

    It is an actual synthesis of massive financing being used for the purposes of disinformation on a level not seen since Josef Goebels led Hitlers efforts to create mass indoctrination and also for duping the Jews into believing the concentration camps were actually work rehabilitation centers; that gas chambers were actually showers.

    You have to understand that Rupert Murdoch has taken his sensationalist brand of Journalism, handed its news bureau over to Roger Ailes, Ronald Reagans Republican Party Chief Political Strategist, in order to build an organization whose specific function is to destroy the Democratic Party.

    Fox is supplied talking points that are created by the Heritage foundation, a sham organization populated by the most conservative people on the planet, who twist news into an anti Obama slant at every single opportunity.

    The people who are featured on Fox are almost exclusively not credible journalists, but lawyers and commentators posing as journalists but specializing in rhetoric, not objective truth.

    Eight out of thirteen structure hours of programming (Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Neil Cavuto, Greta Van Sustern, Bill OReilly) consist of the opinion format, not news.

    Fox is essentially an editorial mouthpiece for fundamentalist propaganda. It is unfair and un balanced at almost every turn while describing itself as the very opposite. It utilizes theories of Madison Avenue advertising, while steeped in Nazi Propaganda techniques that were so successful in turning Germany into a brutal fascist regime while duping the world into thinking they were not.

    People with nothing in their lives love to embrace Fox because it gives them a sense of power to belong to a group of people that makes them feel important.

    Fox makes the viewer feel that they are being ripped off and destroyed by Liberals, while in fact the country is in complete control by giant corporations who pour endless money into chasing Liberals onto the endangered species list.

    So effective is the propaganda of Fox, that it has successfully branded environmentalism and Liberalism as the cause of societal destruction, while successfully avoiding the fact that corporations are closing factories and sending jobs to communist China, which supplies slave labor.

    Fox is the mouth piece of Right Wing haters of psychological freedom and moral responsibility, and their institutional backers. The merits of Fox are far outweighed by the heavy handed continuous hammering and disinformation put in a so called news format.

    This organization is more dangerous than Osama Bin Laden in weakening the American spirit of compassion, commitment toward truth, and intellectual honesty.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 21, 2010 10:07 PM GMT
    ^What he said.
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 22, 2010 12:04 AM GMT
    People also watch WWF wrestling

    That doesn't make it real icon_neutral.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 1:49 AM GMT
    GQjock saidPeople also watch WWF wrestling

    icon_neutral.gif



    Love me some John Cena, Batista, or Randy Orton-




    Would like to know what is considered fair and balanced?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 2:00 AM GMT
    daguerreo said
    GQjock saidPeople also watch WWF wrestling

    icon_neutral.gif



    Love me some John Cena, Batista, or Randy Orton-




    Would like to know what is considered fair and balanced?



    LMFAO!
    NOT you.
    You're a biased right-winger.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 3:19 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 saidminiscule


    Think of it this way: MINUS. Ergo, minuscule.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/minuscule

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 3:57 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said


    LMFAO!
    NOT you.
    You're a biased right-winger.



    Again my question goes unanswered---and as usual I get accused of being a right winger! icon_rolleyes.gif show me any post where I have declared that I am a right winger? You can't---been accused many times. Have declared myself a liberal left wing faggot in one post and that's probably a lot more closer to the truth but because I like to question and I since I certainly have no hatred for the right you like to call people names?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 3:59 AM GMT
    Get a load of Fox's O'Reilly's non-apology.
    It's a load of BS,

    http://www.nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/07/bill_oreilly_apologizes_to_shi.html

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 4:07 AM GMT
    rickrick91 saidGet a load of Fox's O'Reilly's non-apology.
    It's a load of BS,

    http://www.nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/07/bill_oreilly_apologozes_to_shi.html



    Again on the attack and the link doesn't work---still can't answer my question--- what do you consider fair and balanced?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 4:25 AM GMT
    daguerreo said
    rickrick91 said


    LMFAO!
    NOT you.
    You're a biased right-winger.



    Again my question goes unanswered---and as usual I get accused of being a right winger! icon_rolleyes.gif show me any post where I have declared that I am a right winger? You can't---been accused many times. Have declared myself a liberal left wing faggot in one post and that's probably a lot more closer to the truth but because I like to question and I since I certainly have no hatred for the right you like to call people names?



    You are a dishonest right-wing troll pretending to be a "liberal left wing faggot".

    FYI - we don't call ourselves "faggot".
    Using that ugly word to describe what you're pretending to be is a dead give away.

    We know who and what you are and aren't buying your BS.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 4:31 AM GMT
    daguerreo said
    rickrick91 saidGet a load of Fox's O'Reilly's non-apology.
    It's a load of BS,

    http://www.nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/07/bill_oreilly_apologozes_to_shi.html



    Again on the attack and the link doesn't work---still can't answer my question--- what do you consider fair and balanced?



    The TRUTH is fair and balanced.
    And it's a rare commodity on Fox.

    http://www.nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/07/bill_oreilly_apologizes_to_shi.html
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Jul 22, 2010 6:03 AM GMT
    Southbeach1500 said:
    "Why don't you spend a little less time obsessing about Fox News - they have a miniscule % of the voting population watching them. Really, if you keep it up, you are gonna start getting paranoid."
    _______________________________________________________

    A) Obsessing ? It is you who is always posting their lies and claiming that they're fact.

    B) A "miniscule % of the voting population" can, and does decide the outcomes of elections. And, if enough ignorant or stupid people (like you) or people easily influenced by fear, hatred, and lies (like you) believe that Fox News is really news, rather than propaganda, they can easily sway an election.

    C) Paranoia ? Just like your radical right wing Teabagger Republican idols, you love to accuse other people of being the way you actually are.
    BTW, paranoia is irrational fear. I'm not afraid of Fox News. And, calling Fox News on their propaganda and lies and their blatantly Republican cheerleading is common knowledge. Nothing at all irrational about that charge.
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 22, 2010 10:38 AM GMT
    rickrick91 saidGet a load of Fox's O'Reilly's non-apology.
    It's a load of BS,

    http://www.nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/07/bill_oreilly_apologizes_to_shi.html



    This man is in a world unto himself
    First of all everything comes back to him ... and secondly he's a lying sack icon_confused.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 1:48 PM GMT
    Much of the other media outlets have consistently not covered or minimized items unfavorable to Obama, going back to before the election.

    Many have gone to Fox because of the general bias of the media. If they were more honest, Fox wouldn't be so strong.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 8:54 PM GMT
    There's no more biased "news" source out there than FOX.

    Case in point: The Sherrod case.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 11:02 PM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    rickrick91 said
    We know who and what you are and aren't buying your BS.

    RickRick knows all!



    And SB knows nothing.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 11:10 PM GMT
    socalfitness saidMuch of the other media outlets have consistently not covered or minimized items unfavorable to Obama, going back to before the election.

    Many have gone to Fox because of the general bias of the media. If they were more honest, Fox wouldn't be so strong.



    Your BS allegation that the legitimate media outlets haven't been criticizing Obama is TOTALLY FALSE.
    It's just biased BS you heard on Fox.
    If you think there's any truth to it, please post proof.

    And, "many have gone to Fox" because they're right-wing Teabagger Republicans like yourself who prefer to have their news spun with a right-wing BIAS.

    You cannot claim that the legitimate news media isn't "honest" without posting PROOF of your allegation.
    As the Sherrod story proved, it's FOX that is dishonest.
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 22, 2010 11:15 PM GMT
    Fox is NOT a news organization
    It is agenda driven media

    and it has been shown OVER and OVER and OVER again that everything out of its Lying mouths is slanted to state the republican agenda

    If you cannot see this as a living fact then you are either brain dead or you NEED not to understand it as fact
    so which one is it?
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14305

    Jul 22, 2010 11:15 PM GMT
    As far as I am concerned, none of the news organizations are unbiased. Lets face reality, they don't report the news, they make the news. It is all a money making ratings game and that is no bullshit. It doesn't matter if it is FOX News, NBC, or any other news network. Regardless of either being liberal, moderate, or conservative all these networks are making huge profits pushing their viewpoints and political agendas. I don't trust the news media.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 11:29 PM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness saidMuch of the other media outlets have consistently not covered or minimized items unfavorable to Obama, going back to before the election.

    Many have gone to Fox because of the general bias of the media. If they were more honest, Fox wouldn't be so strong.



    Your BS allegation that the legitimate media outlets haven't been criticizing Obama is TOTALLY FALSE.
    It's just biased BS you heard on Fox.
    If you think there's any truth to it, please post proof.

    And, "many have gone to Fox" because they're right-wing Teabagger Republicans like yourself who prefer to have their news spun with a right-wing BIAS.

    You cannot claim that the legitimate news media isn't "honest" without posting PROOF of your allegation.
    As the Sherrod story proved, it's FOX that is dishonest.

    The outlets minimized coverage of Obama's associations in Chicago, never called him on his claims that ObamaCare would not impact anyone who wanted to keep their existing plans, etc.

    Also, Rick, I'm disappointed that you resorted to calling me a name (right-wing Teabagger Republicans like you). I have only disagreed with your positions and never characterized you in a negative way.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2010 11:46 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness saidMuch of the other media outlets have consistently not covered or minimized items unfavorable to Obama, going back to before the election.

    Many have gone to Fox because of the general bias of the media. If they were more honest, Fox wouldn't be so strong.



    Your BS allegation that the legitimate media outlets haven't been criticizing Obama is TOTALLY FALSE.
    It's just biased BS you heard on Fox.
    If you think there's any truth to it, please post proof.

    And, "many have gone to Fox" because they're right-wing Teabagger Republicans like yourself who prefer to have their news spun with a right-wing BIAS.

    You cannot claim that the legitimate news media isn't "honest" without posting PROOF of your allegation.
    As the Sherrod story proved, it's FOX that is dishonest.

    The outlets minimized coverage of Obama's associations in Chicago, never called him on his claims that ObamaCare would not impact anyone who wanted to keep their existing plans, etc.

    Also, Rick, I'm disappointed that you resorted to calling me a name (right-wing Teabagger Republicans like you). I have only disagreed with your positions and never characterized you in a negative way.



    Please - "right-wing Teabagger Republican" is NOT a "name-calling" personal attack.
    If you believe that those words constitute an offensive attack, maybe you need to change your political views so the words don't describe you any more.

    And to state that legitimate news outlets have "never" discussed the HCR bill negatively, including whether or not everyone will really be able to keep their existing coverage - is totally false.
    CNN - for sure had a lot of dissection of the HCR reform bill that included the very critical opinions of some people about the details of the bill.

    The fact that you use the prejorative - right-wing BS - term "ObamaCare" to describe the HCR bill, takes away from you any right to be offended by my use of the term "Teabagger".
    At least the Teabaggers themselves chose the word "Teabagger" for themselves.
    It was the biased right-wing attack machine that coined the term "ObamaCare".
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2010 12:05 AM GMT
    OK Rick - I will not take that as name calling.

    Also, I wasn't aware that the term ObamaCare was considered offensive. If I realized it, I would not have used it. I thought since it was a bill he championed, that was a descriptive, catchy term that took hold, and I thought it was used by all sides. But I withdraw that term.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2010 1:05 AM GMT
    sxydrkhair saidI am not really a big fan of Fox News or CNN. They both are pretty much right-wingers.



    I agree, and that John King USA show reminds me of a Red Neck Cafe..

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2010 1:45 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said


    The TRUTH is fair and balanced.
    And it's a rare commodity on Fox.



    and again you don't answer my question----


    what is the truth? Where do you obtain your truth?

    Your attacking me w/ names is getting old too. Get out of Cochise county much?
    And where are you from originally?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2010 1:48 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 saidSocalFitness,

    When they call you a "lying turd" or "stupid piece of shit" or the RJ favorites: "fucktard" or "asshat"... then you'll be the recipient of name calling.

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif



    Those names are used by folks on your side of the aisle too, Mr. Republican SB.
    Just check out BeefyTX's posts.