Al Gore cleared of assault charges. The "lack of credible evidence" cited.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 31, 2010 11:12 PM GMT
    http://gawker.com/5601027/al-gore-cleared-in-sexual-assault-case

    There is a "lack of credible evidence"?
    And yet it recieved extensive and sensationalist coverage on the Fox pro-right-wing propaganda channel?
    Yet ANOTHER story that was extensively covered by Fox "News" and NOT by the legitimate credible news channels - has been found to be a pile of right-wing BS?

    Yes, indeed.

    All the legitimate news organizations barely covered this story, and were very clear in stressing the lack of credibilty of the charges.
    Fox went overboard - delighting in pounding Gore and trying to sell the sleaze.

    It's MORE proof that Fox "News" is the laughingstock total joke of news organizations.

    It's MORE proof that Fox will cover any story they think could hurt Democrats - even if it lacks the credibilty to merit hot and heavy coverage - and even if they have to abandon all journalistic integrity.
    Job #1 at Fox is selling right-wing spin to viewers.
    They don't give a shit about getting the facts straight.

    MORE reason to never get spun with right-wing BS by watching Fox.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 31, 2010 11:14 PM GMT
    and we should never question what Rickrick prints?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 3:30 AM GMT
    To SB, with love....
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 3:49 AM GMT
    ...and CNN and MSNBC aren't blatantly pro-Obama in the stories they choose to cover? ...uh huh, right. Look, Rickrick, just because you hate Republicans doesn't mean your leftist kind aren't just as guilty, if not more so.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 5:46 AM GMT
    rickrick91 saidhttp://gawker.com/5601027/al-gore-cleared-in-sexual-assault-case

    There is a "lack of credible evidence"?


    Is that sort of like "no controlling legal authority"?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 10:14 AM GMT
    Fearthefall said...and CNN and MSNBC aren't blatantly pro-Obama in the stories they choose to cover? ...uh huh, right. Look, Rickrick, just because you hate Republicans doesn't mean your leftist kind aren't just as guilty, if not more so.


    MSNBC, you've got a case. CNN, no.
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Aug 01, 2010 12:12 PM GMT
    The Portland Police Bureau did not recommend prosecution "due to a lack of credible evidence," according to the Multnomah County district attorney's office.
    Al Gore won't face prosecution in sexual assault allegation
    By the CNN Wire Staff
    July 30, 2010 10:42 p.m. EDT

    I don't see a mention or a MSNBC byline anywhere here .... do you?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 2:12 PM GMT
    Fearthefall said...and CNN and MSNBC aren't blatantly pro-Obama in the stories they choose to cover? ...uh huh, right. Look, Rickrick, just because you hate Republicans doesn't mean your leftist kind aren't just as guilty, if not more so.


    Fox news and the people who watch it haven't yet comprehended the concept that you can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts.

    And facts almost always have a "liberal bias" if you follow right-wing responses.

    It's like shooting fish in a barrel to find fox news lies and distortions.

    CNN (which is becoming more like fox) and MSNBC? Much much MUCH harder to find.

    So basically what you write is a partisan lie.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 2:26 PM GMT
    Hey Southbeach, I have a great idea.... Why don't you trump up your own charges against Al Gore for sexual harassment? They didn't believe this masseuse's charges, but maybe they will believe yours! I mean, you're clearly on a crusade against anything liberal, so why not take it to the next level? If nothing else, it will give you a break from preaching (with minimal success) to a bunch of liberal lugnuts like us.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 01, 2010 2:33 PM GMT
    Fearthefall said...and CNN and MSNBC aren't blatantly pro-Obama in the stories they choose to cover? ...uh huh, right. Look, Rickrick, just because you hate Republicans doesn't mean your leftist kind aren't just as guilty, if not more so.


    No, they are not blatantly pro-Obama. I no longer watch CNN, but I do watch MSNBC, and can tell you that it is not blatantly pro-Obama. All shows on MSNBC, even the commentators like Olberman and Maddow, do plenty of Obama admin. bashing.