Ding dong the bitch is dead.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 18, 2010 5:28 AM GMT
    Well, maybe not - but at least her show is.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100818/ap_on_en_ot/us_dr_laura

    Yes, Dr. Laura has had her show cancelled.
    The gay hating, black hating, women's rights hating talk show host has been forced into retirement.
    She should've been put out to pasture years ago, but better late than never.

    One less right-wing hatemongerer on talk radio.



  • nessthing

    Posts: 68

    Aug 18, 2010 7:34 AM GMT
    How long till she starts working for FOX?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 1:06 AM GMT
    nessthing saidHow long till she starts working for FOX?



    Although Schlessinger is a former nude "model", she may now be too old to be an on-air personality at Fox.
    They like their female hostesses young and hot as an adult film star.

    After all, the Fox audience is primarily made up of straight Republican men who like to look at a little eye candy while they're getting their daily dose of right-wing BS spin.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 1:12 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said

    After all, the Fox audience is primarily made up of straight Republican men who like to look at a little eye candy while they're getting their daily dose of right-wing BS spin.



    I am neither straight nor Repulican--and I watch Fox news--I come to Real Jock for my Liberal news to balance everything out and somehow the Fox news doesn't seem to RANT as much as some of the reporters on RJ
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 1:16 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    rickrick91 said
    nessthing saidHow long till she starts working for FOX?



    Although Schlessinger is a former nude "model", she may now be too old to be an on-air personality at Fox.
    They like their female hostesses young and hot as an adult film star.

    After all, the Fox audience is primarily made up of straight Republican men who like to look at a little eye candy while they're getting their daily dose of right-wing BS spin.

    Oy vey.... here you go again on another Fox News posting binge...

    You really should seek some help RickRick... I'm afraid your obsession with Fox News is interfering with your ability to have a social life and form meaningful relationships with people.

    Signed,

    A Concerned Friend



    Nessthing's hair was the only oddly fascinating thing in this thread.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 1:36 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    rickrick91 said
    nessthing saidHow long till she starts working for FOX?



    Although Schlessinger is a former nude "model", she may now be too old to be an on-air personality at Fox.
    They like their female hostesses young and hot as an adult film star.

    After all, the Fox audience is primarily made up of straight Republican men who like to look at a little eye candy while they're getting their daily dose of right-wing BS spin.

    Oy vey.... here you go again on another Fox News posting binge...

    You really should seek some help RickRick... I'm afraid your obsession with Fox News is interfering with your ability to have a social life and form meaningful relationships with people.

    Signed,

    A Concerned Friend




    LMFAO!

    More proof that you don't know WTF you're talking about, SB.
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Aug 19, 2010 2:43 AM GMT
    It must be a huge relief for her, now that she can call anybody a nigger any time she wants, without ever having to apologize.
  • HndsmKansan

    Posts: 16311

    Aug 19, 2010 2:47 AM GMT
    Too bad the Palin woman wasn't on the last show just for giggles.....

    Good riddance!

    icon_evil.gif
  • mke_bt

    Posts: 707

    Aug 19, 2010 2:52 AM GMT

    Would someone please help me out. Post Dr. Laura's PHD dissertation and the exact title of her doctorate. When you're finished, would you please SFU?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 2:54 AM GMT
    SHe has a PhD in physiology.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 4:01 AM GMT
    I'm gonna stir some major controversy here by saying that her sentence "Homosexuality is a biological error" in and of itself has merit. However she uses it out of context to support her biased beliefs. And I think she's right about black people saying the N word but white people not being allowed to say it. It's a fact. And then she has the audacity to say the N word live...which I appreciate her impudent boldness for. She's raping racially-bound verbal decorum and she says the N word to prove her point. icon_cool.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 4:06 AM GMT
    Webster666 saidIt must be a huge relief for her, now that she can call anybody a nigger any time she wants, without ever having to apologize.

    I think that's what finally did her in this last time, wasn't it, using the N-word on air?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 4:25 AM GMT
    Wilton said
    Webster666 saidIt must be a huge relief for her, now that she can call anybody a nigger any time she wants, without ever having to apologize.

    I think that's what finally did her in this last time, wasn't it, using the N-word on air?


    God it's like using the N word for a white person is equivalent to drawing a picture of Prophet Mohammed lol. Freedom of speech has it's limits when there's a few exceptions thanks to special interest groups...or I should say extreme pompous fanatics that erroneously believe think they speak on behalf of everyone in that specific group.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14380

    Aug 19, 2010 10:46 PM GMT
    JB82, Homosexuality is a biological error, yeah right in your dreams. You must be self loathing to even think that a false statement like that has any credible merit. I guess you must have enjoyed listening to Dr. Laura and all her insensitive homophobic, racist, and anti feminist bullshit.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 10:54 PM GMT

    time to flame the total crap out of roadbikeRob. This will be fun! icon_biggrin.gif



    roadbikeRob saidJB82, Homosexuality is a biological error, yeah right in your dreams.

    Wow that's the most cogent and logical reason you've used in a rebuttal ever. Let's apply your technique to other topics.

    "Europe is a continent, yeah right in your dreams."
    "The Earth will be destroyed by 2115, yeah right in your dreams."

    Holy shit! I had no idea that "yeah right in your dreams" completely negates everything! God fucking damn it your so fucking smart. What else do you have to say?



    roadbikeRob saidYou must be self loathing to even think that a false statement like that has any credible merit.

    Ad hominem attacks! Loves it. Don't attack the actual argument, attack the arguer. Next time someone says something like, "I don't care for Whole Foods," I can simply retort with, "You must be self loathing because you said something I disagree with." Fucking GENUIS! What other random neural firing is going on in your brain?



    roadbikeRob saidI guess you must have enjoyed listening to Dr. Laura and all her insensitive homophobic, racist, and anti feminist bullshit.

    More ad hominem attacks. You, sir, should win an award for the best arguer. I mean, you're almost as convincing as a Scientologist! (Are you a Scientologist?)
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14380

    Aug 19, 2010 11:00 PM GMT
    JB82, you want to apply my logic to other topics but those topics are totally irrelevant to the ridiculous statement claiming that homosexuality is a biological error. You don't make any sense. You sound like some little kid who lost his most prized toy with all your pointless ranting. You definitely need to get a grip on life pal.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 11:08 PM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidJB82, you want to apply my logic to other topics but those topics are totally irrelevant to the ridiculous statement claiming that homosexuality is a biological error. You don't make any sense. You sound like some little kid who lost his most prized toy with all your pointless ranting. You definitely need to get a grip on life pal.


    Umm, just because something is a biological error doesn't mean it can't be accepted for what it is. Obviously homosexuality is not according to nature's design for procreation, but so what?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 11:12 PM GMT
    Um mocktwinkie, if I remember right there's some data suggesting that gay uncles provide better transmission of genes in their relatives, so your statement about it being against procreation might not be true:

    http://www.montrealgazette.com/technology/have+super+uncle+evolutionary+advantage+Researchers/2523112/story.html
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 19, 2010 11:14 PM GMT
    And there's the other theory about homosexuality "genes" increasing female fertility:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3735668.stm
    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/111843.php
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2010 12:39 AM GMT
    JB82 saidI'm gonna stir some major controversy here by saying that her sentence "Homosexuality is a biological error" in and of itself has merit.


    No it isn't. Please cite the science that says it is some sort of error, because there is a fuckton of research on homosexuality in animals and I have yet to see it credibly called an error.
  • yankeesblazer...

    Posts: 243

    Aug 20, 2010 12:57 AM GMT
    JB82 saidI'm gonna stir some major controversy here by saying that her sentence "Homosexuality is a biological error" in and of itself has merit. However she uses it out of context to support her biased beliefs. And I think she's right about black people saying the N word but white people not being allowed to say it. It's a fact. And then she has the audacity to say the N word live...which I appreciate her impudent boldness for. She's raping racially-bound verbal decorum and she says the N word to prove her point. icon_cool.gif


    I don't believe it is a biological error. Rather, I believe it is nature's way of preventing overpopulation. Just my opinion though, I admit that I don't have a science background.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2010 12:58 AM GMT
    What does the term "biological error" even mean?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2010 1:07 AM GMT
    yankeesblazerscowboys saidI don't believe it is a biological error. Rather, I believe it is nature's way of preventing overpopulation. Just my opinion though, I admit that I don't have a science background.


    There are some species where individual males who primarily have sex with other males also father the most children. There are cases where an endangered species will still have sex with individuals of the same sex despite the low population.

    Sex serves a variety of purposes in different species. And assigning any sort of correctness to them is, as Jprichva said, is simple anthropomorphizing. It makes sex a simple means of reproduction when it a much, much larger experience physically, emotionally, socially. There is no error.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2010 1:17 AM GMT
    There's just genes, we're all epiphenomena (all social, emotional, sexual and cultural constructs derive ultimately from genes trying to propagate themselves): There are numerous biological errors every day that are made, but you don't see them because they never make it to the next generation or are repaired before they cause damage.
    I think homosexuality falls into the "altruism" category and is only explainable by the gene-based theories of evolution (for which I've already quoted 3 links).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene-centered_view_of_evolution
  • yankeesblazer...

    Posts: 243

    Aug 20, 2010 1:24 AM GMT
    MunchingZombie said
    yankeesblazerscowboys saidI don't believe it is a biological error. Rather, I believe it is nature's way of preventing overpopulation. Just my opinion though, I admit that I don't have a science background.


    There are some species where individual males who primarily have sex with other males also father the most children. There are cases where an endangered species will still have sex with individuals of the same sex despite the low population.

    Sex serves a variety of purposes in different species. And assigning any sort of correctness to them is, as Jprichva said, is simple anthropomorphizing. It makes sex a simple means of reproduction when it a much, much larger experience physically, emotionally, socially. There is no error.


    Interesting post, I didn't realize a lot of that. Thanks.