Like a chihuahua on a german shepherd....

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 12:55 AM GMT
    Do you think physical size is a factor in deciding who's gonna top and who's gonna bottom?

    At 5'7 145 lbs...sometimes it's awkward (and humorous) to top guys who are much taller than 6 or large framed. I have read how lots of guys are versatile (like me) and say it depends on the guy. Knowing that personality of course plays the no. 1 factor...Is this a factor for you too?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 1:27 AM GMT
    I have topped lads from 5'2 through to 6'8 and although when they get too tall, there are some simply some problems with positions, but I only ever top so I have to make it work. Sex while standing becomes a problem when the height difference gets too big, but when you are on a bed or bench its not much of a problem

    Taking a firm line and being very clear and specific about what you want your bottom to do helps a lot.
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Sep 14, 2010 3:01 AM GMT
    The difference in physical size is not important.
    What's important is that the top wants to top and the bottom wants to be topped.
  • safety43_mma1...

    Posts: 4251

    Sep 14, 2010 3:03 AM GMT
    it has nothing to do with it in my opionion. it is what the guy prefers to do. i will top but would rather bottom for the right guy.icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 3:44 AM GMT
    No. Not at all.
  • mizu5

    Posts: 2599

    Sep 14, 2010 3:46 AM GMT
    I am 5'7 / 5'8 and i;'ve only ever topped.

    People think I'm in denial, and often ask how someone my size can be a top.

    I think it's all fiine.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 3:46 AM GMT
    Oh yes definitely, its a huge deciding factor... icon_twisted.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 4:02 AM GMT
    I like topping guys who are taller than me, but of course it depends on my mood and the guy.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 4:12 AM GMT
    It can be a factor: I generally don't feel drawn sexually to guys waaaay taller than me, and as a total top, it wouldn't matter much if they are within a few inches taller than me.

    I'm 6 foot exactly - and I think the tallest I've topped was about 6'4 (and muscled!). Bigger/taller than I normally like, but his ass was the stuff of epic tightness and control.

    Smaller guys though.... rawr.

    Absolutely love the thought of tossing a willing, smaller framed boy down and going to town on him.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 6:04 AM GMT
    It's just interesting that there seems to be a default sense that the bigger one should top the smaller one....how Darwinian..and is it wrong if that seems a little hot?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 6:58 AM GMT
    I'm 6'2" and vers.

    Personally, I find someone's ratio of where everything is more awkward than the tallness.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 8:49 AM GMT
    Like this?

    jude-nacho.jpg

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 8:49 AM GMT
    Physical size has never been an issue with me. I've had boyfriends that ranged in height from 5'6" to 6'4". They've never had problems with my 6'2" frame either.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 10:01 AM GMT
    I think it is only funny if you are watching.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2010 10:55 AM GMT
    im 6'3 and regardless of position i cant be with anyone under 5'10. When im bottoming someone under 5'10 its awkward and when im toping them its even more awkward. Plus over all im more attracted to tall guys.