Bushs funded Hitler rise to power

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 4:16 AM GMT
    This is interesting to me

    http://www.rense.com/general40/bushfamilyfundedhitler.htm
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 4:42 AM GMT
    I heard Bush Sr. was involved in the assassination of JFK too.
    Look it up online.

    Who knows if it's true.
    But, I wouldn't be surprised.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 4:46 AM GMT
    I heard Obama sent a card to Hugo Chavez saying you're my role model.
    Look it up online.

    Who knows if it's true.
    But I wouldn't be surprised.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 5:00 AM GMT
    socalfitness saidI heard Obama sent a card to Hugo Chavez saying you're my role model.
    Look it up online.

    Who knows if it's true.
    But I wouldn't be surprised.




    ROFL!

    I did look up online to see if there were any conspiracy theories about Obama sending Chavez a note, and there's nothing online about it at all.
    You see, you made that shit up.
    I, on the other hand, refferred to ACTUAL conspiracy theories that do exist online about Bush being involved in the killing of JFK..

    Yet again - I post something truthful, and you post something that's BS.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 5:16 AM GMT
    Oh you caught me.
    I just made it up.
    I was imitating your style.
    It wasn't truthful, as yours obviously is.
    There were rumors so there must be some truth.
    Google said so.
    It felt good.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 5:26 AM GMT
    socalfitness saidOh you caught me.
    I just made it up.
    I was imitating your style.
    It wasn't truthful, as yours obviously is.
    There were rumors so there must be some truth.
    Google said so.
    It felt good.




    LMFAO!
    You need to grow a sense of humor.

    I reported on the "rumors".
    I ALSO said "who knows if it's true".
    I did NOT say that it's been proven true.

    And why so irritable?
    Are the tightening polls putting you on edge?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 6:48 AM GMT
    No just having fun.
    Making up no different than false established rumor.
    Very confident in the polls. Big smiles.
    It is good.
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Oct 27, 2010 10:58 AM GMT
    Actually very true

    Prescott Bush and his business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act
    Yup ..... you heard that right
    not in 33 not in 37 but in 1942
    so Bush and crew dealt with NAZI Germany through most of WWII
    and didn't stop until the American Government forced them to

    Acorns don't fall far from the tree ...eh?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3255.htm
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 11:18 AM GMT
    Well damn...I guess from now on everyone compares Bush to Hitler I'll just nod.

    On a similar note I'm sure my family did something shady 100 years ago too. I mean they're from Russia, Germany, Scotland, and Pennsylvania. There's bound to be some scandalism going on there.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 12:13 PM GMT
    JAKEBENSON saidWell damn...I guess from now on everyone compares Bush to Hitler I'll just nod.

    On a similar note I'm sure my family did something shady 100 years ago too. I mean they're from Russia, Germany, Scotland, and Pennsylvania. There's bound to be some scandalism going on there.


    My cousins grandma owned slaves lol
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 12:29 PM GMT
    It's sad how lil we know about the ppl we elect
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 1:43 PM GMT
    The mud slinging in US politics - on both sides. Look guys, is it possible you all just expect too too much from your politicians? They're politicians, and as such, will always fall short of expectations and the more you focus on that, the more frustrated you'll be, I think.

    1942? Good lord, what has that to do with your last president? He wasn't born til 1946!!

    -Doug
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 5:03 PM GMT
    meninlove said The mud slinging in US politics - on both sides. Look guys, is it possible you all just expect too too much from your politicians? They're politicians, and as such, will always fall short of expectations and the more you focus on that, the more frustrated you'll be, I think.

    1942? Good lord, what has that to do with your last president? He wasn't born til 1946!!

    -Doug


    Combined with other stuff it answers alot, yea it was a while ago but the bush family has shown disconcern for others and this might show y ur not ashamed that America is electing families who supported Hitler. Hell Obama catches shit juss for his name
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 5:19 PM GMT
    JAKEBENSON saidWell damn...I guess from now on everyone compares Bush to Hitler I'll just nod.

    On a similar note I'm sure my family did something shady 100 years ago too. I mean they're from Russia, Germany, Scotland, and Pennsylvania. There's bound to be some scandalism going on there.


    Hilarious!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 27, 2010 5:28 PM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness saidOh you caught me.
    I just made it up.
    I was imitating your style.
    It wasn't truthful, as yours obviously is.
    There were rumors so there must be some truth.
    Google said so.
    It felt good.




    LMFAO!
    You need to grow a sense of humor.

    I reported on the "rumors".
    I ALSO said "who knows if it's true".
    I did NOT say that it's been proven true.

    And why so irritable?
    Are the tightening polls putting you on edge?


    Ahh. The joys of having Socal blocked. Now, I don't have to read his attempts to rationalize evil.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 12:19 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness saidI heard Obama sent a card to Hugo Chavez saying you're my role model.
    Look it up online.

    Who knows if it's true.
    But I wouldn't be surprised.




    ROFL!

    I did look up online to see if there were any conspiracy theories about Obama sending Chavez a note, and there's nothing online about it at all.
    You see, you made that shit up.
    I, on the other hand, refferred to ACTUAL conspiracy theories that do exist online about Bush being involved in the killing of JFK..

    Yet again - I post something truthful, and you post something that's BS.



    Draw your own conclusions...

    obama-chavez-handshake-121.jpg


    from this picture I conclude the two leaders were at the same location and there was the customary handshakes in a receiving line.

    What do you reasonably conclude from the picture without text or sound?


    the keywords there are REASONABLY. - and CONCLUDE (not speculate or imagine)



    (
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Oct 28, 2010 12:46 AM GMT
    Must you even TRY SB ?

    You make it SO Easy .... and SO much fun icon_biggrin.gif

    I wonder if there was tongue ... you think there was tongue?

    I think there was tongue

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQSJZVC0u2no2UJUdLoNGo
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 12:51 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 saidMy reasonable conclusion is that the President of the United States is extremely happy to be to finally meet Hugo Chavez, a person who espouses policies that the President of the United States agrees with.

    Even Fidel recently said the system does not work. From AP:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100908/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_cuba_fidel_castro
    So Obama has only Chavez and Evo Morales who agree with his policies.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 4:32 AM GMT
    socalfitness said
    southbeach1500 saidMy reasonable conclusion is that the President of the United States is extremely happy to be to finally meet Hugo Chavez, a person who espouses policies that the President of the United States agrees with.

    Even Fidel recently said the system does not work. From AP:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100908/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_cuba_fidel_castro
    So Obama has only Chavez and Evo Morales who agree with his policies.




    LMFAO!
    That's the closest you've come yet to an actually funny joke, socal.
    Unintentional though it was.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 4:34 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness said
    southbeach1500 saidMy reasonable conclusion is that the President of the United States is extremely happy to be to finally meet Hugo Chavez, a person who espouses policies that the President of the United States agrees with.

    Even Fidel recently said the system does not work. From AP:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100908/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_cuba_fidel_castro
    So Obama has only Chavez and Evo Morales who agree with his policies.

    LMFAO!
    That's the closest you've come yet to an actually funny joke, socal.
    Unintentional though it was.

    Glad you like it rick, but I was dead serious.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 5:11 AM GMT
    socalfitness said
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness said
    southbeach1500 saidMy reasonable conclusion is that the President of the United States is extremely happy to be to finally meet Hugo Chavez, a person who espouses policies that the President of the United States agrees with.

    Even Fidel recently said the system does not work. From AP:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100908/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_cuba_fidel_castro
    So Obama has only Chavez and Evo Morales who agree with his policies.

    LMFAO!
    That's the closest you've come yet to an actually funny joke, socal.
    Unintentional though it was.

    Glad you like it rick, but I was dead serious.



    LOL!
    Yes, you have a deadly serious case of right-wing brainwashing.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 1:53 PM GMT
    lol, some of you guys don't have a clue what left wing is, you just think you do and both your parties are right wing. The democratic party is center right and the republican party far right.

    If you wish to see left wing look up NDP in Canada.

    -Doug
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 28, 2010 3:04 PM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    UpperCanadian said
    southbeach1500 said
    rickrick91 said
    socalfitness saidI heard Obama sent a card to Hugo Chavez saying you're my role model.
    Look it up online.

    Who knows if it's true.
    But I wouldn't be surprised.




    ROFL!

    I did look up online to see if there were any conspiracy theories about Obama sending Chavez a note, and there's nothing online about it at all.
    You see, you made that shit up.
    I, on the other hand, refferred to ACTUAL conspiracy theories that do exist online about Bush being involved in the killing of JFK..

    Yet again - I post something truthful, and you post something that's BS.



    Draw your own conclusions...

    obama-chavez-handshake-121.jpg


    from this picture I conclude the two leaders were at the same location and there was the customary handshakes in a receiving line.

    What can you reasonably conclude from the picture without text or sound?


    the keywords there are REASONABLY. - and CONCLUDE (not speculate or imagine)



    (


    My reasonable conclusion is that the President of the United States is extremely happy to be to finally meet Hugo Chavez, a person who espouses policies that the President of the United States agrees with.



    Oh dear. you do not understand what a reasonable conclusion is.

    This is an example of the difference between our "lay" thinking, vs how a lawyer is taught to assess only what is there, and not make unwarranted assumptions.



    I put into bold the parts that are just your speculation. You must learn to describe what you SEE not what you assume.



    example:

    "what colour is that house?

    layperson: "It is white."

    lawyer: "it is white on the side I can see."

    (It is LIKELY that it is white on the pther side too, but it is unreasonable to just assume that.



    It is a practised way of thinking that lawyers TRAIN for



    Another example:

    The AR school board trustee with the offensive Facebook post.

    layperson says - "he wrote that!?" Disgraceful! He should resign!

    lawyer says "someone who had access to his account posted THAT? "
    and nothing more.




    Now, SB - try again:

    from that picture - what can you reasonably conclude without making fallacious assumptions See if you can hone your critical thinking skills.

    icon_smile.gif