America's Most Attractive and Least Attractive People (by city)

  • BIG_N_TALL

    Posts: 2190

    Nov 09, 2010 4:25 AM GMT
    So... where do you fall????

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/08/most-attractive-people_n_780402.html

    http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/11/10/where-do-americas-most-attractive-people-live/

    I can vouch for Charleston. icon_biggrin.gif
  • commoncoll

    Posts: 1222

    Nov 09, 2010 4:25 PM GMT
    You better have boyfriends lined up for you!

    I'm on the ugly list and can vouch for that. The closest would be Houston.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 09, 2010 4:28 PM GMT
    Salt Lake City is pretty stacked with good looking people. I vouch for that.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 09, 2010 4:49 PM GMT
    I Disagree.

    NYC didn't make the cut? and I lived in DC and they're some beautiful folk walking around the Capital.
  • Karnage

    Posts: 704

    Nov 09, 2010 4:54 PM GMT
    Hillie saidI Disagree.

    NYC didn't make the cut? and I lived in DC and they're some beautiful folk walking around the Capital.


    Yeah, I was surprised about NYC too. I wonder if it's more of an average. NYC is huge, so while there may be a lot of damn good looking people, there's probably a good number of fugly ones too!
  • NashRugger

    Posts: 1089

    Nov 09, 2010 4:56 PM GMT
    Pretty interesting to find Nashville at #10, which I agree with, but go west on I-40 and you're in the #1 Least Attractive, Memphis.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 3:28 AM GMT
    I, too, live in an ugly city. I don't need a survey to tell me that.
  • Import

    Posts: 7190

    Nov 10, 2010 3:29 AM GMT
    my city is the mosy beautiful because I live there. Photobucket
  • disasterpiece

    Posts: 2991

    Nov 10, 2010 3:47 AM GMT
    Oh, strangely, I thought that Mexico and Canada were also part of what we call "America".

    Damn United States... icon_rolleyes.gif
  • jgymnast733

    Posts: 1783

    Nov 10, 2010 4:02 AM GMT
    Karnage said
    Hillie saidI Disagree.

    NYC didn't make the cut? and I lived in DC and they're some beautiful folk walking around the Capital.


    Yeah, I was surprised about NYC too. I wonder if it's more of an average. NYC is huge, so while there may be a lot of damn good looking people, there's probably a good number of fugly ones too!

    How is it possible for NYC to not make the cuticon_question.gif
    However, we have our share of fuglys' too just like eveyone else, i blame the females for this....Most of the woman dont take the time to look good any more, plus they dress to impress other woman and not men..Bad Move..
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:14 AM GMT
    This is misleading, because it is a slide show of the 10 most attractive and 10 least attractive cities. It seems to be the cities themselves, not the people. If it were the people, then why are all the slides of skylines or downtowns of the cities and not of people in the cities? The Huffington Post made a mistake by picking this story up from Travel and Leisure magazine and putting the word 'people' in the story. Do you really think Travel and Leisure would do a story like that?
  • turtleneckjoc...

    Posts: 4685

    Nov 10, 2010 4:16 AM GMT
    Well.....I hate to admit it, but we are number FIVE in the LEAST attractive category.......and I agree with this completely. Sorry, but it's the truth.

    (with me being the lone exception, of course....)
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:16 AM GMT
    Heartrobb saidThis is misleading, because it is a slide show of the 10 most attractive and 10 least attractive cities. It seems to be the cities themselves, not the people. If it were the people, then why are all the slides of skylines or downtowns of the cities and not of people in the cities? The Huffington Post made a mistake by picking this story up from Travel and Leisure magazine and putting the word 'people' in the story. Do you really think Travel and Leisure would do a story like that?

    That makes sense. But I'm a blind sheep.
  • rioriz

    Posts: 1056

    Nov 10, 2010 4:20 AM GMT
    I can definitely vouch for Nashville as a whole! Now when it comes to the gays...meh
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:20 AM GMT
    Mmh.
    I guess Im just optimistic. I think boys from the north are.. icon_redface.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:22 AM GMT
    Austin has a lot of hotties, but most of them aren't online.
    Houston certainly is full of uglies because it is a fat city (you have to drive 20 min to get anywhere if you live IN THE CITY...and lots of people commute from outside of the city, which means they sit a lot more than people in other cities, which makes them fatter.
  • BIG_N_TALL

    Posts: 2190

    Nov 10, 2010 4:25 AM GMT
    Heartrobb saidThis is misleading, because it is a slide show of the 10 most attractive and 10 least attractive cities. It seems to be the cities themselves, not the people. If it were the people, then why are all the slides of skylines or downtowns of the cities and not of people in the cities? The Huffington Post made a mistake by picking this story up from Travel and Leisure magazine and putting the word 'people' in the story. Do you really think Travel and Leisure would do a story like that?


    It's possible I suppose. Though, I think if it was indeed cities themselves as opposed to people, I am fairly certain other cities would have out-placed Charleston and a few other cities on that list. 'Looks' and attraction are always subjective - it's a constant in the universe like gravity.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:26 AM GMT
    How did they create these rankings? One's person's attractive is another person's ugly- everyone has different standards

    And NYC is not on the list. That doesn't make sense even with our huge population creating an average here. I've noticed a lot more good looking people- in all 5 boroughs- than a city I used to live in. (which shall remain unnamed to prevent a city vs city thread)

    And no LA either. That city is practically based on looks.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:41 AM GMT
    Yeah I was in San Diego over the summer and there were a lot of hot people there even though I was at the Comic Con! Ha ha. There were still lots of hot locals. I've seen a good number of good looking Salt Lake City guys on here too.

    I guess I live in in state that's neither ugly nor beautiful although I think they based it more on weather since the best looking people seemed to be in the warmer climates.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 10, 2010 4:48 AM GMT
    Born and raised in Philly. Though, not a warlock, I guess the extra weight can/will predicate my "ugliness."
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 11, 2010 1:56 AM GMT
    Seattle should be in the ugly category for sure.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 11, 2010 1:58 AM GMT
    lol...ntrly.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 11, 2010 2:01 AM GMT
    wow... the DC-Baltimore-Philly area got pimp slaped
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 11, 2010 5:28 AM GMT
    Denver is number 9? isnt colorado one of the fittest states? I think we should get extra points for that and be bumped up to at least top 5
  • Joeyphx444

    Posts: 2382

    Nov 11, 2010 6:19 AM GMT
    I'm sry but why do u read the snuffington posT?