Endowment question?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 04, 2010 11:39 PM GMT
    Gay men are statistically more well endowed than straight men. I found this online how many of you would say this is true? What do you think! from my experience i would say True but then again i haven't seen as much straight cock:-)icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 04, 2010 11:46 PM GMT
    PICTURES!...MUST HAVE PICTURES!!!! icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 12:03 AM GMT
    If that were true, gay4pay porn wouldn't pay so much.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 12:07 AM GMT
    colemccnnll saidGay men are statistically more well endowed than straight men. I found this online how many of you would say this is true? What do you think! from my experience i would say True but then again i haven't seen as much straight cock:-)icon_biggrin.gif


    Sorry, but I think such a blanket assertion like this is total bs and I would strongly question any "study" that tries to say otherwise. I'm not saying I don't wish this were true, but I have never, ever seen or heard of any sound scientific evidence to support such a theory. Just because someone online said it was true doesn't make it so.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 12:37 AM GMT
    colemccnnll saidGay men are statistically more well endowed than straight men. I found this online how many of you would say this is true? What do you think! from my experience i would say True but then again i haven't seen as much straight cock:-)icon_biggrin.gif

    Post the link to the online info so we can see it.
  • rnch

    Posts: 11524

    Dec 05, 2010 12:41 AM GMT
    "this thread IS useless without pics"

    icon_cool.gif

    icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 12:48 AM GMT
    He's probably talking about this study

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10410197
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 12:52 AM GMT


    rightasrain saidHe's probably talking about this study

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10410197


    EXACTLY!!!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 12:56 AM GMT
    UMM I WISH TAT WAS TRUE!!
  • Celticmusl

    Posts: 4330

    Dec 05, 2010 1:19 AM GMT
    I've mostly been with guys about average give or take an inch or two. In my life at least this "statistic" is a bit off. I'm not complaining.

    I would like to see a study about those with larger "appendages" as possibly being more promiscuous.... I only have empirical evidence to support this theory.
  • conservativej...

    Posts: 2465

    Dec 05, 2010 1:24 AM GMT
    Well, if it is photos you want, as well as an example that might truly make one think about the "size" of a gay man's equipment, look at the adult photos of our very own hotguyxxx.

    I bet his appendage makes the remainder of his body dehydrate.

    P.S. My apology hotguyxxx, you are about to receive lots of traffic on your profile.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:24 AM GMT
    well what does everyone consider average, large and extra large? I was told average - regardless of ethnicity, save asian (no offense ) was 5.5 to 6 - that being said, if someone is 7 are they large?
  • jgymnast733

    Posts: 1783

    Dec 05, 2010 1:26 AM GMT
    As i'v mentioned in the past [a million times], that i'v gone to all boy schools all my life and the shower scene was intense...Its about 50/50 i'd say....
  • DukeAtreides

    Posts: 64

    Dec 05, 2010 1:29 AM GMT
    Has anyone checked the study to see how penis size was reported? If it was self-report, one might simply conclude that gay men self-report larger penises. There may be a reason why.

    Also, this was in the 1960s. Did you think to question the statistical analyses? Or what about how homosexuality was categorized? They used a dichotomous measure, according to the abstract - rarely is that an accurate measurement method.
  • Celticmusl

    Posts: 4330

    Dec 05, 2010 1:31 AM GMT
    royken73 saidwell what does everyone consider average, large and extra large? I was told average - regardless of ethnicity, save asian (no offense ) was 5.5 to 6 - that being said, if someone is 7 are they large?


    Average(median) is 5.5 to 6.5. So 7 would be considered larger than average.



    penis-size.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:31 AM GMT
    conservativejock saidWell, if it is photos you want, as well as an example that might truly make one think about the "size" of a gay man's equipment, look at the adult photos of our very own hotguyxxx.

    I bet his appendage makes the remainder of his body dehydrate.

    P.S. My apology hotguyxxx, you are about to receive lots of traffic on your profile.


    just checked...he must have a syncopal episode every time he gets hard...that's too big. what do you do with it other than sling it over your shoulder and burp it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:35 AM GMT
    Celticmusl said
    royken73 saidwell what does everyone consider average, large and extra large? I was told average - regardless of ethnicity, save asian (no offense ) was 5.5 to 6 - that being said, if someone is 7 are they large?


    Average(median) is 5.5 to 6.5. So 7 would be considered larger than average.



    penis-size.jpg


    Yay...i'm large...lol. it's really sad because so many gay men put so much emphasis on how their penis is or another man's penis. No matter how you cut it there is NOTHING ON GOD's GREEN EARTH that a man can do about it and as long as it get erect and can do the job...be happy. Too many people sweat this body stat. I'd rather a guy with a hot body and great personality with an average pecker than a man with 9 inches who you'd NEVER even think to be friends with let alone date. To the originator of this topic...be happy with what you got....seriously.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:35 AM GMT
    rightasrain saidHe's probably talking about this study

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10410197


    Here's the key phrase of the report summary: "On all five measures, homosexual men reported larger penises than did heterosexual men."

    Just because gay men reported that their goods were larger than straight men again does not make it true. I could tell someone I have a 9 incher but, alas, it wouldn't make it the truth. What I take away from this is that there is a real, and reasonable, likelihood that gays are more likely to be physically insecure and preoccupied with their bodies than our straight counterparts (The profiles on the RJ website alone gives weight to this argument). With that might come the need to "enhance" our penis dimensions when asked by others so as to satiate our need to measure up to the "ripped body/big dick" stereotype that many gays feel they should have.

    Also, look at the years of the study. The Kinsey Institute questioned men for the years of 1938 to 1963. While I am unwilling to discount such a dated study as I have no proof that it is wrong, I would be more comfortable accepting the results of a study that is more modern and doesn't rely solely on the honesty of the respondents.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:37 AM GMT
    Congress should not cut funding of the NEA.




    That was the question, right?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:37 AM GMT
    Well said blu
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:39 AM GMT
    HeartRobb saidCongress should not cut funding of the NEA.




    That was the question, right?


    no Robb it was about penis size...that age old question of adequacy and measuring up and if it's all that important in the end. don't worry i'll get you up to speed...lol. You're a nut
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:42 AM GMT
    Nah, I don't agree with this. Can't say that sexuality and cock size are linked without real proof. I know some straight guys that are packin some serious heat. And I know gay guys that are tiny. It's about the person biologically, not the sexuality. But that's just my take lol
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:42 AM GMT
    royken73 said

    no Robb it was about penis size...that age old question of adequacy and measuring up and if it's all that important in the end. don't worry i'll get you up to speed...lol.





    You're a nut


    Is that where I measure from?
  • barriehomeboy

    Posts: 2475

    Dec 05, 2010 1:44 AM GMT
    Gay men are more attractive than str8 men. That's the trutch, but, more hung, no. Even gay men drive big cars because they have little-penis syndrome.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2010 1:46 AM GMT
    A load of crock if you ask me. I don't think you can statistically calculate endowment based on a quality of a person other than genetic makeup. Even then I thi it's not something you inherit from another person.

    My hypotheses is that the length is totally random based on some genetic mix which has no other dependencies on factors also present.

    There is no sound scientific evidence that determines the endowment of a guy whether he be heterosexual or homosexual.

    Also remember there are probably a load of those 'straight guy's who are still in the closet which can totally skew the results of such a survey.

    If they can find a gay gene, then would be more comfortable making such an assertion.