David Boies Says Antonin Scalia Could Vote Against Gay Marriage Ban Prop 8

• metta
  
  Posts: 44241
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 7:46 AM GMT

  David Boies Says Antonin Scalia Could Vote Against Gay Marriage Ban Prop 8
  
  
  
  http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=7043&MediaType=1&Category=26
  
  
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 5:59 PM GMT

  I don't believe it's beyond the realm of possibilities that Scalia might vote that “gay” marriage is a constitutional right on par with “straight” marriage... but I also won't be holding my breath. While a 9-0 victory with the Supreme Court would be a landmark dream come true, it is very, very unlikely given the complicated and overly political nature of this issue.
  
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 7:32 PM GMT

  I have no doubt that as a result of this comment, Scalia is now having his mind changed and brought into line with the wishes and agenda of the religious right by Republican activists.
  He will be made to toe the party line.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 7:48 PM GMT

  He said that well. Getting the government out of our personal lives SHOULD be both a conservative and liberal issue. Unfortunately, both seem to enjoy interfering heavily on different levels - one in the bedroom and one in the wallet.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Vaughn
  
  Posts: 1880
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 7:59 PM GMT

  mocktwinkie saidHe said that well. Getting the government out of our personal lives SHOULD be both a conservative and liberal issue. Unfortunately, both seem to enjoy interfering heavily on different levels - one in the bedroom and one in the wallet.

  
  
  Bedroom among other things.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• EricLA
  
  Posts: 3462
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 8:04 PM GMT

  I just don't see the Conservatives on the Court, especially someone like Scalia, voting to strike Prop 8. I see him finding a way to vote in favor.
  
  I could see the Court deciding to let the lower ruling stand, which would be amazing itself. But I don't think this will happen, either. I'm sure it will all come down to Kennedy, as it always does.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 8:04 PM GMT

  Scalia will never vote to uphold gay rights. Are you guys hallucinating? Scalia hates gays, a Republican right-winger who will always vote against gays, as the Party tells him. This is total nonsense.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 8:04 PM GMT

  The white TBagger, bible totting, wifeof the black Supreme Court member will be working on her husband and Scallia, so don't be counting on a 9 to 0 ruling.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 8:29 PM GMT

  Vaughn said

  mocktwinkie saidHe said that well. Getting the government out of our personal lives SHOULD be both a conservative and liberal issue. Unfortunately, both seem to enjoy interfering heavily on different levels - one in the bedroom and one in the wallet.

  
  
  Bedroom among other things.

  
  
  And on the opposite side, wallet among other things, but it all goes back to the wallet.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 8:52 PM GMT

  The guy is one of the worst things to happen to the SC and the "could vote" is really really stretching the hypothetical conditional that "could" expresses.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• rnch
  
  Posts: 11556
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 8:56 PM GMT

  when i first read the title of this thread; i wondered why david bowie was commenting on this.
  
  then i found my reading glasses.......

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Mepark
  
  Posts: 806
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 10:34 PM GMT

  BlueBlur saidI don't believe it's beyond the realm of possibilities that Scalia might vote that “gay” marriage is a constitutional right on par with “straight” marriage... but I also won't be holding my breath. While a 9-0 victory with the Supreme Court would be a landmark dream come true, it is very, very unlikely given the complicated and overly political nature of this issue.
  
  

  
  
  ...and yet he had no problem declaring sodomy laws were not unconstitutional.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Dec 08, 2010 10:40 PM GMT

  mocktwinkie said

  Vaughn said

  mocktwinkie saidHe said that well. Getting the government out of our personal lives SHOULD be both a conservative and liberal issue. Unfortunately, both seem to enjoy interfering heavily on different levels - one in the bedroom and one in the wallet.

  
  
  Bedroom among other things.

  
  
  And on the opposite side, wallet among other things, but it all goes back to the wallet.

  
  
  
  Don't worry. I doubt your money will go to help the poor and sick anytime soon. Rest easy.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM