FearTheFall saidSince there are a lot of no-pic profiles that try to instigate drama in the forums, why not require all profiles have at least one picture uploaded before they can participate in forums? It could cut down on unwanted posting, and would make it more difficult for people to make sock accounts and immediately begin their attack.
Sorry, but what's the difference between if you're attacked by someone with a photo, and if you're attacked by someone without a photo? Do you need to see a photo of the person in order to mount a retort?
Moreover, given what you
in particular have done with some of the photos (assuming of course you really did create the asinine "RealJock" entry on that equally asinine "Encyclopedia Dramatica" site), you must be on crack if you think that I'd ante up a photo for the "privilege" of exchanging banter with you!
I do believe there are things that people without photos should adhere to...chief among them, making NO snide remarks about the appearance of those who have posted up photos! And I know for a fact that I have never assailed the looks of anyone on this website...something which can't be said for a good number of posters WITH photographs!
If you really believe that the site should restrict the use of the forum only to those who have a verified photo, then take it up with whomever owns the website...and if they decide to enact that policy, then perhaps some of us who have not posted up photos will opt to do so.
I will not be among those individuals however: I have never given anyone a hard time or pressured anyone to share that which they do not want to share, and I'll be damned if I'm going to allow myself to be bullied into providing a photo for the privilage of contributing another opinion to a forum that should, by it's vary nature, crave them!
I may in time choose to share a photo...but I'll do it when I'm good and ready to do so!