"The 2 Reasons Muni Investors Should Be Terrified By What's Going On In Wisconsin"

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 20, 2011 4:14 PM GMT
    It will be useful to watch the coming spreads. I suspect that the Governor will prevail. If he doesn't, what happens to the premium paid on muni's will show whether or not there is reason for concern (higher interest rates mean higher costs for already highly indebted municipalities and states) and increasing the probability of default.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/The-2-Reasons-Muni-Investors-siliconalley-359156189.html?x=0&.v=1

    The newly-elected GOP governor of Wisconsin is eager to push through a bill that would kill collective bargaining for state workers. It would pass, except for one problem, which is that Democrats have fled the state to Illinois to prevent a vote.

    First of all, we think this will end in tears for the Democrats. They look like wusses fleeing the state, and it could even hurt Obama, if he's forced to come in on the side of state unions.

    For muni investors, there are two reasons to worry.

    The first is that nobody had Wisconsin on its list of big states to worry about going into the new year. That's not to say Wisconsin is going to blow up, but it does suggest that things can and do come out of nowhere all the time. You know, black swans and stuff.

    The other reason it's worrisome is that it shows just how far the Democratic party will go to the mat for public employee unions, and how hard it might be to cut costs. A bull case for munis has centered on the idea that there's plenty of room to cut expenses, before having to default on debt. But if this debate is ripping apart a state like Wisconsin, then it should make you question that assumption.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 20, 2011 4:26 PM GMT

    "The newly-elected GOP governor of Wisconsin is eager to push through a bill that would kill collective bargaining for state workers"

    The unions in question (HE CHERRY-PICKED SOME AND EXEMPTED OTHERS THAT COST MORE) agreed to cuts which he refused.


    Comprehension, you lack.

    What do you think a teacher should make, riddler?



  • rnch

    Posts: 11525

    Feb 20, 2011 4:30 PM GMT
    LMAO @ anyone quoting yahoo as a creditable, reliable, accurate news source.

    icon_lol.gif


    this thread is lame. like something southbeach would copy & paste. it's THAT bad, riddler.

    icon_rolleyes.gif
  • rnch

    Posts: 11525

    Feb 20, 2011 4:34 PM GMT
    it appears to me that the OP is quoting a thinly vieled editorial as if it it a hard news fact item icon_question.gif



    icon_confused.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 20, 2011 5:07 PM GMT
    A whole thread of doubling-down on the Grand Lie that the protests in Wisconsin are about wages and benefits.

    It's about the attempt to eviscerate collective bargaining rights, which of themselves have no impact on the fiscal health of the state.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2011 12:53 AM GMT
    Yes I was distressed that he exempted police & fire - EVERYONE should kick in. We are all beseiged. But those two unions supported him. And he named his father State Police Supt. at $105K a year - dad had lost a county sheriff election. ACROSS THE BOARD I SAY!