Such a big package for nothing!

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 3:39 AM GMT
    I just got my bt receiver today....Im guessing they dont own smaller boxes

    img2151he.jpg

    img2150at.jpg

    img2154e.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 3:54 AM GMT
    Wow, what a waste of trees, they couldnt mail it in an envelope!!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 3:58 AM GMT
    lmfao! well...hey if that costed u alot, then its a win-win situation. If they placed it in a smaller box, it'd be easier to "steal" in mail(if u get ur packages insured then there is no prob; for a cheap price O_O )...i don't really trust Priority anymore(they took at least 3weeks for my medium sized package to come..it was also tampered and stuff...) cuz they flake around....thing is, u can recycle that box icon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gif. yaaaay
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 3:59 AM GMT
    GigoloAssassin saidWow, what a waste of trees, they couldnt mail it in an envelope!!!



    yeah! they should have. icon_eek.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 6:21 AM GMT
    Shipping was more expensive than the actual receiver, I guess that's why
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 6:49 AM GMT
    Dunno how it works in canadia, but the USPS has a "flat rate box" system. Sometimes it actually costs more to use a smaller package. I guess they like the nice uniform size.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 01, 2011 7:05 AM GMT
    You didn't find the sock?