What makes a photo 'Adult' on RJ?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 5:08 PM GMT
    Out of the photos on my profile here, I've just noticed one of them has been classified as 'Adult' even though I don't think it has any adult content (no nudity).

    It's an underwear shot but nothing's exposed, and there's swimwear shots almost identical that haven't been classified as 'Adult'.

    So what's up with that? I'm not interested in having 'Adult' pics on my profile, is there a way to challenge the classification or should I just remove them?

    Anyone else had this happen?
  • Timbales

    Posts: 13993

    Apr 21, 2011 5:14 PM GMT
    it's classed as adult if the editor feels a stirring in his nether regions when viewing it?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 5:16 PM GMT
    Timbales saidit's classed as adult if the editor feels a stirring in his nether regions when viewing it?


    Then according to my nether regioin, almost every picture on RJ is adult. icon_cool.gificon_redface.gificon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 5:16 PM GMT
    nevermind... that's weird actually... they all have an erect penis.
  • Timbales

    Posts: 13993

    Apr 21, 2011 5:22 PM GMT
    Alpha_Muscle said
    Timbales saidit's classed as adult if the editor feels a stirring in his nether regions when viewing it?


    Then according to my nether regioin, almost every picture on RJ is adult. icon_cool.gificon_redface.gificon_wink.gif


    you either have a medical condition or low standards icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 5:26 PM GMT
    I don't know why your swimsuit pictures aren't adult too.
    They all have erections in them which would deem them 18+ on any kind of site.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 5:40 PM GMT
    You need to take a micrometer to your penis area. If the angle of the bulge from the front plane is greater than 15 degrees, then you are showing too much, and it would be declared adult.

    Silly, isn't it? icon_cool.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 6:24 PM GMT
    TrevorMark saidI don't know why your swimsuit pictures aren't adult too.
    They all have erections in them which would deem them 18+ on any kind of site.


    Er... that's not an erection icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 6:26 PM GMT
    Pure said
    TrevorMark saidI don't know why your swimsuit pictures aren't adult too.
    They all have erections in them which would deem them 18+ on any kind of site.


    Er... that's not an erection icon_rolleyes.gif

    Then your balls are too far pressed up and giving your penis more blood than it needs to have. Looks like an erection to everyone else.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 6:45 PM GMT
    Pure said
    TrevorMark saidI don't know why your swimsuit pictures aren't adult too.
    They all have erections in them which would deem them 18+ on any kind of site.


    Er... that's not an erection icon_rolleyes.gif


    In that case... How YOU doin? icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 7:11 PM GMT
    It's hit and miss, I've noticed. I don't think my adult pic should have been put there, considering the other day I messaged a guy who has not only his bush but half his completely exposed penis in his profile pic.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 7:20 PM GMT
    Pure said<

    Er... that's not an erection icon_rolleyes.gif


    SSR gets in his car and heads to Pure's house!!!!!!icon_twisted.gif

    icon_wink.gificon_cool.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 9:18 PM GMT
    Pure said
    TrevorMark saidI don't know why your swimsuit pictures aren't adult too.
    They all have erections in them which would deem them 18+ on any kind of site.


    Er... that's not an erection icon_rolleyes.gif


    It's a zuchini.


    Zuchini Pictures, Images and Photos
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 9:37 PM GMT
    Timbales saidit's classed as adult if the editor feels a stirring in his nether regions when viewing it?
    In that case, about 80% of the shirtless shots and flexing biceps shots would be "adult" to me. icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 21, 2011 10:51 PM GMT
    MuchMoreThanMuscle said

    I am telling you, white bright socks will make any man's penis twitch upon first sight of them.


    LOL! I usually do wear white socks, I had no idea they had such aphrodisiac qualities!

    Anyway, clarification on the non-erection issue, that pair of swimwear just happens to be the 'thrust it all forward' kind, and no room in the pouch area means positioning is to the side, hence the confusion I guess. But that makes my point even more valid, if that can be mistaken for an image of arousal then why where they not labelled 'adult' when the other one was? Subjective interpretation of adult content, I guess. Maybe I'll just set them all as private and forget it.
  • masculumpedes

    Posts: 5549

    Apr 21, 2011 11:11 PM GMT
    Pure said
    MuchMoreThanMuscle said

    I am telling you, white bright socks will make any man's penis twitch upon first sight of them.


    LOL! I usually do wear white socks, I had no idea they had such aphrodisiac qualities!.


    Personally, I prefer your bare feet. icon_twisted.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 22, 2011 1:04 PM GMT
    Pure saidEr... that's not an erection icon_rolleyes.gif




    Oh my. What size shoe do you wear?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 22, 2011 1:54 PM GMT
    It may have to do with the detail of the outline in the briefs, versus the swim suit. Plus at first glance the head seems more pronounced in the underwear shot, suggesting a hardon, but that might be a shadow illusion caused by a seam being right there.

    We used to say that a guy's clothes are too tight if you can tell what his religion is. A somewhat meaningless statement in the US said more for laughs, since most men here are circumcised regardless of religion. But with a native Brit, more likely uncut, perhaps RJ saw that outline as stronger evidence of a stiffie.

    Who knows? But it's readily viewable on the profile, nice pic along with the others, so keep it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 22, 2011 4:32 PM GMT
    I haven't seen any kind of consistency about this on most web sites. For example, I couldn't get a pic approved on another site, until I took one with a shirt on... even though 90% of the existing pics there are shirtless. (Maybe it's just MY torso that's obscene.)

    I can't help thinking that it must just be a matter of which old lady in Bangladesh is approving pics at the moment. Which brings up the next thought, which is that reviewing internet profile pics must be one of the most horrible jobs on the planet. Certainly it ought to desensitize one's gag reflex.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 24, 2011 11:05 AM GMT
    malefeet said
    Personally, I prefer your bare feet. icon_twisted.gif


    Oh no feet pics on here, my feet are weird - my big toe is shorter than the toe next to it, which apparently is not normal (I didn't figure this out for a long time)!


    Iceblink said
    Oh my. What size shoe do you wear?


    UK 10's

    Art Deco said

    Plus at first glance the head seems more pronounced in the underwear shot, suggesting a hardon, but that might be a shadow illusion caused by a seam being right there.


    Yeah, definitely a seam/shadow!

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 5:37 PM GMT
    Ok - I recalled this thread from a while back and wanted to comment. I posted an underwear pic that I thought wasn't outrageous or exceptional compared to what I've seen in other guys public pics and RJ determined it to be ADULT. I am pretty certain I've seen at least a few pics showing pubes and/or erections in public profile pics. The one I posted earlier today shows neither so not sure why it was determined to be adult? icon_confused.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 7:32 PM GMT
    sashaman saidOk - I recalled this thread from a while back and wanted to comment. I posted an underwear pic that I thought wasn't outrageous or exceptional compared to what I've seen in other guys public pics and RJ determined it to be ADULT. I am pretty certain I've seen at least a few pics showing pubes and/or erections in public profile pics. The one I posted earlier today shows neither so not sure why it was determined to be adult? icon_confused.gif

    If it's the green Diesel briefs I can't figure it out, either. icon_confused.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 10:55 PM GMT
    Yup - it is the photo with the green Diesels. I've had photos I would agree are adult but I didn't think this one was. Nice to know I'm not the only one! icon_wink.gif