The Latest State to Restrict Unions: Massachusetts

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 27, 2011 6:03 PM GMT
    I confess, this surprises me. Of course, it's an indication that some states are serious about dealing with the massive liabilities that are hurtling their way because of entitlements and public sector agreements.

    http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/04/27/house_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/

    House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly last night to strip police officers, teachers, and other municipal employees of most of their rights to bargain over health care, saying the change would save millions of dollars for financially strapped cities and towns.

    The 111-to-42 vote followed tougher measures to broadly eliminate collective bargaining rights for public employees in Ohio, Wisconsin, and other states. But unlike those efforts, the push in Massachusetts was led by Democrats who have traditionally stood with labor to oppose any reduction in workers’ rights.

    Unions fought hard to stop the bill, launching a radio ad that assailed the plan and warning legislators that if they voted for the measure, they could lose their union backing in the next election. After the vote, labor leaders accused House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo and other Democrats of turning their backs on public employees.

    “It’s pretty stunning,’’ said Robert J. Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO. “These are the same Democrats that all these labor unions elected. The same Democrats who we contributed to in their campaigns. The same Democrats who tell us over and over again that they’re with us, that they believe in collective bargaining, that they believe in unions. . . . It’s a done deal for our relationship with the people inside that chamber.’’

    “We are going to fight this thing to the bitter end,’’ he added. “Massachusetts is not the place that takes collective bargaining away from public employees.’’

    The battle now turns to the Senate, where President Therese Murray has indicated that she is reluctant to strip workers of their right to bargain over their health care plans.

    DeLeo said the House measure would save $100 million for cities and towns in the upcoming budget year, helping them avoid layoffs and reductions in services. He called his plan one of the most significant reforms the state can adopt to help control escalating health care costs.
  • rnch

    Posts: 11524

    Apr 27, 2011 6:17 PM GMT
    78, do you realize how much you sound like an entitled, arrogant, spoiled lil' rich kid who has NO idea of what it's like out there in the "Real World"?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 27, 2011 6:21 PM GMT
    rnch said78, do you realize how much you sound like an entitled, arrogant, spoiled lil' rich kid who has NO idea of what it's like out there in the "Real World"?



    Sorry, I'm just posting clips of articles from the "Real World" that I find interesting for any number of reasons in large part to add to the other articles being posted and discussed. What precisely has you offended?
  • Timbales

    Posts: 13993

    Apr 27, 2011 6:37 PM GMT
    As long as safety and labor laws are being followed, I don't see the need for a union for the vast majority of public employees.