Schock Value

  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    May 10, 2011 1:45 AM GMT
    Okay .... I said it
    If this guy's not gay I'm turnin in my gay card and goin home lol icon_cool.gif
    Our closeted gay republican of the month just got a cover for Men's Health Magazine
    MH0611_CVR_Schock.jpg?uuid=DHRWTHpxEeCkC
    MH0611_F20S_02.jpg?uuid=DNCrmnpxEeCkCHJL

    Personally .... the pictures are wooden
    Oops, did I say that icon_wink.gif
    They are he's much prettier than that

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 10, 2011 3:52 AM GMT
    Photoshop does wonders for abs doesnt it? icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 10, 2011 5:03 AM GMT
    In that 2nd pic, the lower half of his body looks so different than the top lmao it looks awkward
  • chgobuzz1

    Posts: 155

    May 10, 2011 5:14 AM GMT
    Here in Illinois he is widely rumored to be gay. His district is south of Chicago and very republican. There are pics of him at a White House picnic in white jeans and a red, white and blue shirt with a little scarf tied around his neck LOL. In Illinois we have many closeted republicans...like our new Senator Mark Kirk.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19133

    May 10, 2011 5:19 AM GMT
    Did you ever think that maybe, just maybe, it's a good thing that he's a Republican and possibly gay? No one says ANYBODY, and that includes politicians, absolutely MUST reveal their sexuality to the world. Granted, I know very little about this guy (though, damn, I'd like to know more - LOL) but unless he is taking anti-gay stances on all gay issues, and is also gay, then I'm okay with him remaining in the closet. We all know he won't be able to do that for long because God knows some self-righteous queen will be all to glad to out him and throw him to the wolves.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 10, 2011 5:26 AM GMT
    Byline: "Congressman bares chest to promote fitness."

    He's certainly trying to promote something.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19133

    May 10, 2011 5:31 AM GMT
    jprichva said
    Now now, I thought you were supposed to be genial. This almost sounds----well, bitter.


    What do I have to be bitter about? I just find it really pathetic that some gays are so damn mean-spirited. For all we know, Aaron Schock may be a great guy with the potential to not only be a great congressman, but also a friend to the gay community. Good for him that he got the cover of MEN'S HEALTH. If he is gay, I'd say he's representing quite nicely.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 10, 2011 5:31 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidDid you ever think that maybe, just maybe, it's a good thing that he's a Republican and possibly gay? No one says ANYBODY, and that includes politicians, absolutely MUST reveal their sexuality to the world. Granted, I know very little about this guy (though, damn, I'd like to know more - LOL) but unless he is taking anti-gay stances on all gay issues, and is also gay, then I'm okay with him remaining in the closet. We all know he won't be able to do that for long because God knows some self-righteous queen will be all to glad to out him and throw him to the wolves.


    He's taking anti-gay stances with one of the worst records for voting on gay rights.


    From: http://thatsmycongress.com/house/repSchockIL18111.html

    H.R. 2965

    Substantively, the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy weakens the strained U.S. military by kicking people out with good service records. There is a more formal problem with DADT as well: the policy to discriminate, to kick people out of the military because of their sexual orientation, is a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010 not only lends substantive benefit to the military and to lesbian and gay servicemembers, but also strengthens constitutional government.

    Representative Schock voted AGAINST this progressive measure.


    H.R. 310

    H.R. 310, passed by the House of Representatives on September 8, 2009, is regressive in many senses. Environmentally, it hands over a public lands to an organization that seeks to develop them for its own private uses. The bill assaults the separation of church and state by doing special favors for an organization that discriminates against non-religious Americans, refusing them employment and membership. The bill is also a blow against equality for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans, because the organization discriminates in hiring and membership against them as well. Finally, the bill is an insult to Native Americans, giving over public lands so that they can be used in the mock rituals of an organization that encourages young boys to dress up in cartoonish versions of Native American costumes and pretend to be Indians.

    The discriminatory organization this bill was designed to assist: The Boy Scouts of America, which seems to believe that it can attack the civic values of equality and respect for diversity, and still claim that any politician who dares protest is unpatriotic. Only seven members of the House of Representatives had the courage not to vote for this bill to coddle discrimination, and they only had the courage to vote "present".

    Representative Schock voted YES to pass this regressive measure.


    He voted against amending federal hate-crimes laws to include crimes where the victims were targeted on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, gender and disability.[25] ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 223: H R 1913 Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act". United States House of Representatives. April 29, 2009. Retrieved February 11, 2011.


    He also voted against the repeal of the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in December 2010.[26] ^ "House Vote 638 - Repeals 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'". The New York Times. December 15, 2010.

    Hypocrisy will catch up to him,
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19133

    May 10, 2011 5:37 AM GMT
    GAMRican said
    CuriousJockAZ saidDid you ever think that maybe, just maybe, it's a good thing that he's a Republican and possibly gay? No one says ANYBODY, and that includes politicians, absolutely MUST reveal their sexuality to the world. Granted, I know very little about this guy (though, damn, I'd like to know more - LOL) but unless he is taking anti-gay stances on all gay issues, and is also gay, then I'm okay with him remaining in the closet. We all know he won't be able to do that for long because God knows some self-righteous queen will be all to glad to out him and throw him to the wolves.


    He's taking anti-gay stances with one of the worst records for voting on gay rights.

    Hypocrisy will catch up to him,



    As I said upfront, I know very little about the guy -- now I know more (thank you GAMRican), and I agree whole-heartedly that hypocrisy will catch up with him IF he is gay.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 10, 2011 5:40 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    As I said upfront, I know very little about the guy -- now I know more (thank you GAMRican), and I agree whole-heartedly that hypocrisy will catch up with him IF he is gay.


    He is gay- so there's no need for a big "if."




    How do I know? A faery told me. icon_cool.gif

  • chgobuzz1

    Posts: 155

    May 17, 2011 6:10 AM GMT
    These secrets have a way of coming out. He votes the republican anti-gay line as that is the type of conservative down state Illinois district he represents. As long as he votes that way they will protect him and support him in Washington Republican circles. That is what is so vile about politics- they KNOW he is gay, they KNOW there are ther gay republican Congressmen (and at least 1 Senator Kirk). But as long as they follow the party line they are protected. So being in the closet is really just old-fashioned greed and thirst for power along with a large dose of insecurity and low self-worth. I hope being on the cover gives him a measure of self-confidence which he sorely lacks. I dated a similar gay republican who went so far as to find an unwitting Japanese girl to marry him. He staged the wedding like Phantom of the Opera for God's sake ! Even used all the music ! He admitted after 6 years to me he used her to get ahead in republican circles in Illinois but never quite made it. They divorced after 6 years. What a vile user he was...I will never date another insecure divorced man again.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 17, 2011 12:10 PM GMT
    I'm not going to lie, he does look damn good. That first pic with the dress shirt open and the tie is hot.
  • Timbales

    Posts: 13993

    May 17, 2011 12:32 PM GMT
    he looks older than 30
  • Celticmusl

    Posts: 4330

    May 17, 2011 1:20 PM GMT
    I can't wait until his gay prostitute releases the sex vid...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 17, 2011 1:33 PM GMT
    Have a friend who went to school w/ him in Bradley. Rumor, just rumor, is that he is hoping the GOP position on gay marriage changes so he can come outta the closet. But, that doesn't explain his voting record. I do know it is a not-so-big of a secret on campus that he is gay, but campus rumors have a life of their own. I used to live in IL-18; while a conservative district, it is not so conservative that supporting some token gay rights would kill 'em. Good chance his district will be eliminated/ redistricted to much more liberal this yr anyway.