Shirtless, Androgynous Male Model Banned

  • metta

    Posts: 39143

    May 17, 2011 11:26 PM GMT


    Shirtless, Androgynous Male Model Banned


    ANDREJ-PEJIC-DOSSIERxlrg.jpg

    http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/05/17/Shirtless_Androgynous_Male_Model_Banned/
  • alphatop

    Posts: 1955

    May 18, 2011 12:15 AM GMT
    My god, he looks anorexic, not androgyny. Horrible. If that is what man should look like like in 21st century, than I'd rather be a woman!
  • alphatop

    Posts: 1955

    May 18, 2011 12:18 AM GMT
    MuchMoreThanMuscle saidThat was a very dramatic response, sort of like a woman. icon_smile.gif


    You think?icon_lol.gif
  • Timbales

    Posts: 13993

    May 18, 2011 12:20 AM GMT
    Banned is a strong word and misleading. The magazine is available for purchase but, not without the jackets at those two store chains.

    Best thing for this magazine, they are getting tons of free publicity.
  • danielvn

    Posts: 222

    May 18, 2011 1:46 AM GMT
    Many of European male models are like that. They all have that Kate Moss look lol. It's just a trend in fashion I think
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:48 AM GMT
    Sorry, but that "dude" needs to eat something other than air. Men (and women) are not supposed to be anorexic. In b4 cultural norms blah blah blah. Anorexia is bad per BIOLOGY, which trumps cultural norms.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:48 AM GMT
    Oh, big shocker, an american company has a ridiculous and puritanical overreaction to something that is nothing.

    God I wish this country would grow up.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:54 AM GMT
    FearTheFall saidSorry, but that "dude" needs to eat something other than air. Men (and women) are not supposed to be anorexic. In b4 cultural norms blah blah blah. Anorexia is bad per BIOLOGY, which trumps cultural norms.


    Your so right naturally skinny people don't exist.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:55 AM GMT
    WhatsDoing91 said
    FearTheFall saidSorry, but that "dude" needs to eat something other than air. Men (and women) are not supposed to be anorexic. In b4 cultural norms blah blah blah. Anorexia is bad per BIOLOGY, which trumps cultural norms.


    Your so right naturally skinny people don't exist.


    Naturally ANOREXIC people don't. Slender builds are different from emaciated waifs.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:55 AM GMT
    Puritanical America strikes again.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:56 AM GMT
    FearTheFall said
    WhatsDoing91 said
    FearTheFall saidSorry, but that "dude" needs to eat something other than air. Men (and women) are not supposed to be anorexic. In b4 cultural norms blah blah blah. Anorexia is bad per BIOLOGY, which trumps cultural norms.


    Your so right naturally skinny people don't exist.


    Naturally ANOREXIC people don't. Slender builds are different from emaciated waifs.


    And you don't know him or his diet, so you really can't speak on whether he's anorexic or not.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 1:58 AM GMT
    SDGMAN saidOh, big shocker, an american company has a ridiculous and puritanical overreaction to something that is nothing.

    God I wish this country would grow up.
    +1
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 2:01 AM GMT
    FearTheFall said
    WhatsDoing91 said
    FearTheFall saidSorry, but that "dude" needs to eat something other than air. Men (and women) are not supposed to be anorexic. In b4 cultural norms blah blah blah. Anorexia is bad per BIOLOGY, which trumps cultural norms.


    Your so right naturally skinny people don't exist.


    Naturally ANOREXIC people don't. Slender builds are different from emaciated waifs.
    Take a good close look at that shot...lots of editing there. Natural wrinkles have been removed, the jaw bones have been rounded, and there's been some dodging/burning on his sternum to give him a more emaciated look.

    If you could rewind the edits, it looks to me like he's a naturally thin guy who's been thinned even more via Photoshop, and the desired result is happening: Free publicity.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 2:14 AM GMT
    SDGMAN saidOh, big shocker, an american company has a ridiculous and puritanical overreaction to something that is nothing.

    God I wish this country would grow up.


    It's always these christian groups that throw themselves into a fit of rage. The US walks on eggshells because of them.

    When will the media expose link between the republican party and these psychos?
  • lopakados

    Posts: 34

    May 18, 2011 2:45 AM GMT
    He just looks hungry - he can barely hold that shirt up. LOL
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 2:55 AM GMT
    Ugghhhh. My dick just crawled between my legs trying to hide!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 3:16 AM GMT
    His chest looks like very small breasts (undefined, large nipple, some sagging)
    His abdomen is very feminine as well
    So it’s very androgynous therefore it has the same standards as a female model.
    I’m not surprised given US standards

    And at this point editors know a cover like this will be controversial they love free advertising Borders does as well. And the model will be more noticed and get more gigs.

    The only victims here are the stupid groups that think they do a public service when in fact they’re helping desensitizing people and slowly killing their cause.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 3:47 AM GMT
    Scruffypup saidUgghhhh. My dick just crawled between my legs trying to hide!


    Hey, the article says the kid (19yo) is approaching international "supermodel" status.

    Just goes to show you there is something for everyone.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 3:50 AM GMT
    I need bleach for my eyes.icon_eek.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 4:34 AM GMT
    This is a stupid reason to ban a cover. Stupid fucking store. I hope it burns in hell when Jesus comes on May 21st to save us from the United States's obsession with over-censoring nudity.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 4:44 AM GMT
    Well if you kinda think about it the store is raising an objection to the female body image not the actual gender.

    boobs are a no go
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 4:46 AM GMT
    JAKEBENSON saidThis is a stupid reason to ban a cover. Stupid fucking store. I hope it burns in hell when Jesus comes on May 21st to save us from the United States's obsession with over-censoring nudity.



    You heard about that too?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 4:50 AM GMT
    JAKEBENSON saidThis is a stupid reason to ban a cover. Stupid fucking store. I hope it burns in hell when Jesus comes on May 21st to save us from the United States's obsession with over-censoring nudity.



    Jesus Christ is not coming on May 21st!, I need more time ..... Crying.gifCrying.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 4:58 AM GMT
    This a male? Wow! I think this pic sends way too many confusing messages...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 18, 2011 5:01 AM GMT
    I envy his bone structure, he's so fuckin pretty icon_razz.gif