rickrick91 saidBullshit thread.Did you read the article? It is about the war in Libya, which is now officially illegal, and Obama is violating the constitution by continuing it.
The public's anger was over the Iraq war, and Obama has pulled most of the troops out of Iraq and is slowly carefully and responsibly passing over complete control of Iraq to the Iraqis.
Bush did nothing of the kind and opposed doing anything of the kind.
So, Obama's handled the war in Iraq differently than Bush did.
Obama promised in his campaign to finish the job in Afghanistan and he's been doing what he promised to do since he was elected.
There is still some anti-war movement against the war in Afghanistan, but it's vastly smaller than the large angry anti-war movement against the Bush war in Iraq because the two wars are VERY different.
Different wars = different response.
I responded to your comment regarding the fact that the anti-war movement responded differently to the war in Iraq under Bush than it has to the other wars.
As I said - "different wars = different reactions".
Regarding the rest of your post - this nonsense about our participation in a NATO-led campaign in Libya being a "illegal war" is a bunch of right-wing BS that's being mouthed by right-wingers like George Will.
It's a fucking joke and doesn't merit serious comment.