It might be my Weiner!

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 01, 2011 10:23 PM GMT
    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/06/01/weiner-its-possible-lewd-photo-is-of-him/

    One step closer to admitting it! "It might be mine"??? REALLY? LOL. Just admit it already, nobody cares.


    But really, how can you look at a picture and say "it might be mine". It's either yours or it isn't.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 01, 2011 10:43 PM GMT
    I'd know it wasn't a pic of me because I don't have any underwear that color or style. And I think the brand may be Munsingwear, since it appears to have a unique horizontal fly they used to call a "Kangaroo pouch," at least when I had a few of their pairs, nearly 30 years ago.

    So the Congressman should be able to identify his own underwear, if not his own bulge. Then the question becomes did someone snap him with a cell-cam in a locker room without his permission.

    It does seem odd he would post such a pic to his own Twitter account, which I understand his son usually manages. And who quickly took the pic down when he discovered it, not long after its public posting, rather than done as a private post to the supposed intended recipient.

    None of that makes sense, unless his account was hacked.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 01, 2011 10:46 PM GMT
    Mock -

    I'm very disappointed as I thought this thread would include pictures of your "weiner." icon_cry.gif
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jun 01, 2011 10:51 PM GMT
    Just admit it already, nobody cares.

    Mock ,,,, You care just a little now don't you? .... Just a eensy-weensy little bit

    icon_cool.gif

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 12:19 AM GMT
    GQjock saidJust admit it already, nobody cares.

    Mock ,,,, You care just a little now don't you? .... Just a eensy-weensy little bit

    icon_cool.gif



    Only because he's lying about it. if he admitted it there would be no juice to squeeze out of it.

    People make mistakes, just admit and move on. If he just admits it I think it won't hurt him at all but if he keeps going on denying it I think it will be a problem.
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Jun 02, 2011 12:26 AM GMT
    mocktwinkie said
    GQjock saidJust admit it already, nobody cares.

    Mock ,,,, You care just a little now don't you? .... Just a eensy-weensy little bit

    icon_cool.gif



    Only because he's lying about it. if he admitted it there would be no juice to squeeze out of it.

    People make mistakes, just admit and move on. If he just admits it I think it won't hurt him at all but if he keeps going on denying it I think it will be a problem.





    Bullshit. If it were true that Congressman Weiner posted a pic of his boner in his underwear, you and Southbeach (and the rest of the rabid Republican RJ Fascists) would be screaming and crying "SCANDAL" and calling for him to resign.

    There's ZERO evidence that he posted the pic.
    End of story.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 12:41 AM GMT
    Who cares about Weiner's wiener?????
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 1:43 PM GMT
    Webster666 said
    mocktwinkie said
    GQjock saidJust admit it already, nobody cares.

    Mock ,,,, You care just a little now don't you? .... Just a eensy-weensy little bit

    icon_cool.gif



    Only because he's lying about it. if he admitted it there would be no juice to squeeze out of it.

    People make mistakes, just admit and move on. If he just admits it I think it won't hurt him at all but if he keeps going on denying it I think it will be a problem.





    Bullshit. If it were true that Congressman Weiner posted a pic of his boner in his underwear, you and Southbeach (and the rest of the rabid Republican RJ Fascists) would be screaming and crying "SCANDAL" and calling for him to resign.

    There's ZERO evidence that he posted the pic.
    End of story.


    No we wouldn't. That's no reason for someone to resign. But denying it like this, oh yes, a big problem with the American people.

    I'm sorry but you can't "wonder" if a pic might be yours. It's either his or it isn't and he should be able to tell by looking at it. If he said "yes it's my pic but I didn't send it", then that might be REMOTELY believable but not even being able to verify if it's his or not, PLEASE!
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19136

    Jun 02, 2011 2:15 PM GMT
    Webster666 said<
    Bullshit. If it were true that Congressman Weiner posted a pic of his boner in his underwear, you and Southbeach (and the rest of the rabid Republican RJ Fascists) would be screaming and crying "SCANDAL" and calling for him to resign.

    There's ZERO evidence that he posted the pic.
    End of story.



    In all fairness, Webster, there is also ZERO EVIDENCE that he DIDN'T post it. And before you get all up on your high horse bashing Mock or anyone else who is questioning all this, let's consider what you would be posting if the situation was say a photo of a woman in her panties sent from Michelle Bachman's account.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 2:18 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidIn all fairness, Webster, there is also ZERO EVIDENCE that he DIDN'T post it. And before you get all up on your high horse bashing Mock or anyone else who is questioning all this, let's consider what you would be posting if the situation was say a photo of a woman in her panties sent from Michelle Bachman's account.


    Again - just like I posted in the other thread - the difference would be the stunning hypocrisy by a social conservative, "family values" advocate.

    There is not "zero" evidence that he posted it - it showed up in this Twitter account! Not dispositive, but I wouldn't call that zero evidence, personally.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19136

    Jun 02, 2011 2:29 PM GMT
    showme said
    Again - just like I posted in the other thread - the difference would be the stunning hypocrisy by a social conservative, "family values" advocate.




    No, actually, your being stunningly hypocritical. Had this been a picture of a woman's panties sent from Michele Bachman's account, you know damn well what we would be reading in posts on here. Furthermore, if Michelle Bachman were innocent, and this were due to someone hacking into HER account, I highly doubt that would be making much difference to her naysayers here either. My point is, if someone is wrongly accused, it doesn't matter if they are Republican or Democrat, it's still unfair and unfortunate. Your assertion that it would be seemingly justified due to someone being a "family values" advocate pretty much defines the term "double standard".
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 2:37 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    showme said
    Again - just like I posted in the other thread - the difference would be the stunning hypocrisy by a social conservative, "family values" advocate.




    No, actually, your being stunningly hypocritical. Had this been a picture of a woman's panties sent from Michele Bachman's account, you know damn well what we would be reading in posts on here. Furthermore, if Michelle Bachman were innocent, and this were due to someone hacking into HER account, I highly doubt that would be making much difference to her naysayers here either. My point is, if someone is wrongly accused, it doesn't matter if they are Republican or Democrat, it's still unfair and unfortunate. Your assertion that it would be seemingly justified due to someone being a "family values" advocate pretty much defines the term "double standard".


    Just to correct any misimpression, I'm not saying that a smear against a social conservative is more justified. (Though I would definitely enjoy it even more. How's that for honesty?)

    I'm making an assumption for thie purposes of this argument that it IS Wiener's weiner. IF Michelle Bachman or Rick Santorum got caught sexting, their "family values" stances would make them much more hypcritical than Weiner (assuming that it was, in fact, his action).
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 3:31 PM GMT
    Art_Deco saidI'd know it wasn't a pic of me because I don't have any underwear that color or style. And I think the brand may be Munsingwear, since it appears to have a unique horizontal fly they used to call a "Kangaroo pouch," at least when I had a few of their pairs, nearly 30 years ago.

    So the Congressman should be able to identify his own underwear, if not his own bulge. Then the question becomes did someone snap him with a cell-cam in a locker room without his permission.

    It does seem odd he would post such a pic to his own Twitter account, which I understand his son usually manages. And who quickly took the pic down when he discovered it, not long after its public posting, rather than done as a private post to the supposed intended recipient.

    None of that makes sense, unless his account was hacked.


    The hacking does happen. I had one of my email accts hacked a couple days ago so the spammer could send spam to my entire contact list.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 02, 2011 10:40 PM GMT
    Thursday, Jun 2, 2011 14:07 ET
    Embarrassing emails from Weiner tweeter leaked

    The intrigue surrounding the Anthony Weiner crotch shot story, Andrew Breitbart and a mystery Twitter user deepens


    By Justin Elliott
    AP



    md_horiz.jpg

    Andrew Breitbart

    Did Andrew Breitbart leak embarrassing personal emails sent to him by the mystery Twitter user at the center of the Anthony Weiner crotch shot scandal? Possibly.

    This gets in the weeds of the Weiner saga, but it could help shed light on the origins of the story, so bear with us for a minute. Remember: This all started late last Friday evening when an underwear picture was allegedly sent from the congressman's Twitter account. But no one noticed the image except for Twitter user @patriotusa76, or Dan Wolfe, who seized on the alleged Weiner tweet and publicized it.

    Making things stranger, it's clear from his Twitter feed that Wolfe is a right-wing activist who has been obsessed with Weiner for months, even tweeting way back on May 12 that a "top5 RightWing blogger has sexscandal pics" of Weiner.

    In any case, within hours, Breitbart's BigGovernment.com site picked up on Wolfe's tweets and became the first media outlet to publish a story on the matter. From there the episode blew up -- slowly at first, and then more quickly when Weiner himself started acting strangely and refusing at first to deny sending the picture, then claiming that he couldn't say "with certitude" that the image was not of him. Given Breitbart's long history of unreliability and deceptive editing, mainstream reporters were at first (and to some extent still should be) leery of the whole story.

    The newly released emails involving Breitbart shed light on one key question that remains unanswered: Who is patriotusa76, aka Dan Wolfe? Today, the Smoking Gun published emails that were, the site says, sent from Wolfe in recent days.

    The first one, from May 30, does not list a recipient, but includes some notable admissions from Wolfe:

    "I have ALOT of personal problems I didn’t want to go into--but as I become the focus of this I am more and more afraid this will all come out. I want to tell you why I haven't talked on the phone yet," he writes, continuing:


    I have an en exwife suing me for custody of our 2 kids and for lots of other stuff right now. Her attorneys are after everything I own.

    I have an ex girlfriend who has mental problems causing issues for me at work .

    My business is suffering as a result.

    If my exwife's attorney's got a hold of a call recorded with me on it they'd have a field day with that. I want to try to avoid.

    She had recorded me twice before. She worked with my exgirlfriend and had two calls recorded.

    It has gotten me in a lot of legal trouble.

    I am screwed. If this comes out along with everything I'm dealing with here -- I don't know what to do.


    This is intriguing -- especially that final line. And while the recipient on this email is blurred, the Smoking Gun report seems to suggest it was written in response to Breitbart's attempt "to arrange a conference call to discuss how to further exploit and advance 'Weinergate.'"

    The other email published by the Smoking Gun, dated Saturday at 4 a.m., just hours after the alleged Weiner tweet went out, lists Breitbart as the recipient. It includes several attached images associated with the incident, including the original Weiner tweet. It ends with the promise, "We have more."

    Breitbart did not immediately respond to an inquiry asking if he leaked the emails to the Smoking Gun. But Breitbart now appears to be attempting to distance himself from Wolfe. Here is a string of recent Breitbart tweets, beginning late Wednesday night:


    Come out, come out wherever you are 'Dan Wolfe' @patriotUSA76! Stop hiding behind anonymity! Own up to your role & motivation.

    Is there a real 'Dan Wolfe' @PatriotUSA76 or has someone for months elaborately pretended to be? #Weinergate gets more confusing!

    Lookin' for some clarifying data from @patriotusa76. Call me. I'm listed. Article coming by 2pm EDT @BigGovt

    So for reasons that are not entirely clear, Breitbart wants Wolfe to "own up" to his role in the scandal. The emails to the Smoking Gun at least partially document Wolfe's role. But there remain many unanswered questions: Was Wolfe involved in the "prank" or "hack" that Weiner has alleged? What's his real identity? How did he know back on May 12 that there was a lewd picture scandal involving Weiner on the horizon? And did Breitbart play some other role here that has not yet emerged? We'll update if we hear back from Breitbart.

    Justin Elliott is a Salon reporter. Reach him by email at jelliott@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin More: Justin Elliott
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jun 03, 2011 12:13 AM GMT
    Uhhhh ....... Eyup to the previous poster icon_wink.gif

    I think Breitbart is even afraid of what he's just done