The US government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 08, 2011 4:12 AM GMT
    Add this to the fact that unemployment is creeping up and chronic unemployment is greater than the great depression. The bizarre thing is that there are those even here who claim that there isn't anything wrong with either Medicare or Social Security. I can't tell if they're delusional, corrupt or just tremendously stupid.

    U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions

    The federal government's financial condition deteriorated rapidly last year, far beyond the $1.5 trillion in new debt taken on to finance the budget deficit, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

    The government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010, largely for retirement programs such as Medicare and Social Security. That brings to a record $61.6 trillion the total of financial promises not paid for.

    This gap between spending commitments and revenue last year equals more than one-third of the nation's gross domestic product.

    Medicare alone took on $1.8 trillion in new liabilities, more than the record deficit prompting heated debate between Congress and the White House over lifting the debt ceiling.

    Social Security added $1.4 trillion in obligations, partly reflecting longer life expectancies. Federal and military retirement programs added more to the financial hole, too.

    Corporations would be required to count these new liabilities when they are taken on — and report a big loss to shareholders. Unlike businesses, however, Congress postpones recording spending commitments until it writes a check.

    The $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations amounts to $534,000 per household. That's more than five times what Americans have borrowed for everything else — mortgages, car loans and other debt. It reflects the challenge as the number of retirees soars over the next 20 years and seniors try to collect on those spending promises.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 08, 2011 4:15 AM GMT
    No. It just requires raising taxes, closing loopholes, and using the resulting revenue to take care of our citizens instead of starting wars of choice on behalf of the oil industry.