Draper saidIt is inappropriate. There are RJ members who are under 18.
Really? Well that in itself is inappropriate, and a violation of TOS/TOU, and you should report them for a violation, as well. You don't want this to be a site where we're inadvertently discussing adult sexual subjects with minors, do you?
YOU MUST BE AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18 ) YEARS OLD TO PARTICIPATE ON THE WEBSITE.
- Images of minor persons. Content depicting any person's image, in whole or in part who is under the age of eighteen (18 ) years old, is illegal and prohibited.
I presume "content" could include webcam. I'm not sure if it means cartoons as well, intended for comedy, but without sexual overtones. I do not see an exception for family relations.
Thanks for your valued evaluation. The positive views here are encouraging. The biggest majority by far is not in favour of having kids presented in any fashion on Real Jock.
Now that I am over the enitial trauma of the event. The situation presented on the live video looked totally innocent and harmless in a family situation. (Rosco says not the worst case scenario and I agree). My inner self didn't like the potential implications. . I know at least 2/others in the room were curious as to who the kids were. I expressed in general to the room my protest at allowing kids to watch Real Jock. No one in the room replied to my protest.
Honestly I dont think the guy gave any thought or realised there was anything wrong.
In future under similar circumstances:-
1. Make note of the persons Real Jock Name.
3. Request that he rectify the situation immediately.
4. If your warning is ignored or disputed notify the offender that you now have no other option but to report to Real Jock on the matter for there adjudication.
Thanks again to all of you for your contributions.