KIDS FLAUNTED ON REALJOCK

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 12, 2011 9:11 PM GMT
    I witnessed a member here on RealJock having Kids with him on Cam. To my knowledge this is an over 18/years sight and it is not acceptable to have children under 18/years old on cam on RealJock even if they are accompanied by an adult. Do you agree?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 12, 2011 9:46 PM GMT
    If you have seen it, then the correct thing to do is report it to RealJock. You can click 'report abuse' on the person's profile or click 'help' up in the upper right corner of the RealJock page to email administration.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 12, 2011 9:47 PM GMT
    um, his own kids??

    or just some random kid....


    cause that could be 2 very different scenarios
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 12, 2011 10:13 PM GMT
    whole thread feels trolly...

    if this happened, report it,. but you give no details and no content....
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 12:22 AM GMT
    It's been said, of course.
    suspicious_symbol.jpg..
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:37 PM GMT
    cold saidAre you sure you mean 'flaunted'? In what way were they shown?
    I assume since you saw them on cam you were in the Adult Chat room, which, in my opinion, is inappropriate.

    Yeh in the adult chat room. it all looked innocent like. But i still think inappropriate.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:39 PM GMT
    rosco87 saidum, his own kids??

    or just some random kid....


    cause that could be 2 very different scenarios


    he was asked if they were his kids and he replied yes.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:43 PM GMT
    Iceblink saidIf you have seen it, then the correct thing to do is report it to RealJock. You can click 'report abuse' on the person's profile or click 'help' up in the upper right corner of the RealJock page to email administration.


    Thanks Icelink. If I witness this again this is the action that I will take. I foreget the guys name now.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:45 PM GMT
    It is inappropriate. There are RJ members who are under 18.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:52 PM GMT
    black_panther said
    rosco87 saidum, his own kids??

    or just some random kid....


    cause that could be 2 very different scenarios


    he was asked if they were his kids and he replied yes.


    alright, so not the worst case scenario but still inappropriate. i agree with reporting.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:52 PM GMT
    Lostboy saidwhole thread feels trolly...

    if this happened, report it,. but you give no details and no content....


    I am not sure what "trolly" means in this instance. Both the daddy and the child were dressed on screen. And one other 7/yr old running around in the background. I wasn't the only one in the chatroom and i know at least 2 others witnessed also as they commented on how nice the kids were and asked the question if they were the mans own.

    As I say in the thread It is not appropriate to have kids accompany anyone on RealJock adult chat and if I witness this behaviour again i will take the action suggested by Icelink, and report it now that I know how to go about it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 11:53 PM GMT
    rosco87 saidum, his own kids??

    or just some random kid....


    cause that could be 2 very different scenarios


    This
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 12:06 AM GMT
    pedo-bear-seal-of-approval.png
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 3:09 AM GMT
    Draper saidIt is inappropriate. There are RJ members who are under 18.

    Really? Well that in itself is inappropriate, and a violation of TOS/TOU, and you should report them for a violation, as well. You don't want this to be a site where we're inadvertently discussing adult sexual subjects with minors, do you?

    From RJ Terms of Use:

    ELIGIBILITY

    YOU MUST BE AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18 ) YEARS OLD TO PARTICIPATE ON THE WEBSITE.


    Also:

    - Images of minor persons. Content depicting any person's image, in whole or in part who is under the age of eighteen (18 ) years old, is illegal and prohibited.

    I presume "content" could include webcam. I'm not sure if it means cartoons as well, intended for comedy, but without sexual overtones. I do not see an exception for family relations.

    http://www.realjock.com/tou/
  • Anto

    Posts: 2035

    Jun 14, 2011 3:12 AM GMT
    If it wasn't a sexual situation then who cares? People have pictures of their kids on this site too.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 3:14 AM GMT
    Report , report , report .......and then report .
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Jun 14, 2011 3:38 AM GMT
    Anto saidIf it wasn't a sexual situation then who cares? People have pictures of their kids on this site too.



    Agreed.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 3:43 AM GMT
    Anto saidIf it wasn't a sexual situation then who cares? People have pictures of their kids on this site too.


    This... I mean, if they're not showing the kids some of the inappropriate videos then there's not "really" a problem.

    But... if they're talking to someone via Adult Chat and just having casual conversation like I did on a constant basis, they should move their words and video with friends to Skype or IM.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 3:46 AM GMT
    Webster666 said
    Anto saidIf it wasn't a sexual situation then who cares? People have pictures of their kids on this site too.

    Agreed.

    Perhaps there's need for a clarification on that point, since the TOU I quoted above do not seem to allow for an exception for family members. Perhaps because the RJ Admin would have no way of easily determining who's related or not, and so the simpler way is to prohibit all images of minors.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 5:51 PM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    Draper saidIt is inappropriate. There are RJ members who are under 18.

    Really? Well that in itself is inappropriate, and a violation of TOS/TOU, and you should report them for a violation, as well. You don't want this to be a site where we're inadvertently discussing adult sexual subjects with minors, do you?


    There was a recent thread by someone who said it was his 18th birthday. Unless that day was his actual birthday then he was on here as a minor. And a while back there was news about a man on a sports team who had come out. He had a profile on RJ and was voted in as MOTD. That same day he went into hiding. He was on here since he was 16 and nobody ever reported him. And there are others who are possibly minors but there's really no way to prove it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 6:01 PM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    Webster666 said
    Anto saidIf it wasn't a sexual situation then who cares? People have pictures of their kids on this site too.

    Agreed.

    Perhaps there's need for a clarification on that point, since the TOU I quoted above do not seem to allow for an exception for family members. Perhaps because the RJ Admin would have no way of easily determining who's related or not, and so the simpler way is to prohibit all images of minors.
    I find it rather daunting that pictures with minors - which is clearly against the RJ TOS - get approved by the RJ admin. Yet when I upload a shot cropped at the waistline - clearly showing no pubes - they stick it in my Adult Photos album.

    Maybe the picture approval process and the adult chat room could be more closely monitored?
    If I owned/managed the site, it definitely would be. icon_cool.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 7:03 PM GMT
    Webster666 said
    Anto saidIf it wasn't a sexual situation then who cares? People have pictures of their kids on this site too.



    Agreed.


    +1

    If the kids were running around in the background as was stated, why is this such a big deal? I feel this is more of a parenting decision to look at cams when kids are running in the background. It's not as though the kids themselves are on talking to people in the adult chat.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 9:02 PM GMT
    Chainers said
    rosco87 saidum, his own kids??

    or just some random kid....


    cause that could be 2 very different scenarios


    This


    Just so you are under no illusion the guy when asked by another member whose kids they were he replied they were his.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 9:06 PM GMT
    Chainers said
    rosco87 saidum, his own kids??

    or just some random kid....


    cause that could be 2 very different scenarios


    This


    Chainers I guess you did mean to comment?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2011 11:15 PM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    Draper saidIt is inappropriate. There are RJ members who are under 18.

    Really? Well that in itself is inappropriate, and a violation of TOS/TOU, and you should report them for a violation, as well. You don't want this to be a site where we're inadvertently discussing adult sexual subjects with minors, do you?

    From RJ Terms of Use:

    ELIGIBILITY

    YOU MUST BE AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18 ) YEARS OLD TO PARTICIPATE ON THE WEBSITE.


    Also:

    - Images of minor persons. Content depicting any person's image, in whole or in part who is under the age of eighteen (18 ) years old, is illegal and prohibited.

    I presume "content" could include webcam. I'm not sure if it means cartoons as well, intended for comedy, but without sexual overtones. I do not see an exception for family relations.

    http://www.realjock.com/tou/


    Art_Deco

    Thanks for your valued evaluation. The positive views here are encouraging. The biggest majority by far is not in favour of having kids presented in any fashion on Real Jock.

    Now that I am over the enitial trauma of the event. The situation presented on the live video looked totally innocent and harmless in a family situation. (Rosco says not the worst case scenario and I agree). My inner self didn't like the potential implications. . I know at least 2/others in the room were curious as to who the kids were. I expressed in general to the room my protest at allowing kids to watch Real Jock. No one in the room replied to my protest.

    Honestly I dont think the guy gave any thought or realised there was anything wrong.

    In future under similar circumstances:-
    1. Make note of the persons Real Jock Name.
    2. Explain to the person it is totally against Real Jock Terms Of Use for anyone to be on Real Jock under the age of 18/years.

    3. Request that he rectify the situation immediately.
    4. If your warning is ignored or disputed notify the offender that you now have no other option but to report to Real Jock on the matter for there adjudication.

    Thanks again to all of you for your contributions.