"Popular" NJ Governor Christie for 2016?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 3:27 AM GMT
    NOPE.
    http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/Poll-Christie-opposition-growing-1384696.php
    Christie is not so popular, and is getting less popular.

    The "popular" Governor is the Governor in the next state over.
    NY Governor Andrew Cuomo.
    http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2011/06/01/q-poll-cuomo-gets-high-marks-from-voters/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 3:32 AM GMT
    rickrick91 saidNOPE.
    http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/Poll-Christie-opposition-growing-1384696.php
    Christie is not so popular, and is getting less popular.

    The "popular" Governor is the Governor in the next state over.
    NY Governor Andrew Cuomo.
    http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2011/06/01/q-poll-cuomo-gets-high-marks-from-voters/


    Both are doing a real good job in MY opinion.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19138

    Jun 13, 2011 3:50 AM GMT
    Now Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 3:56 AM GMT
    I do not have enough information on Mr. Christie to form an educated opinion. He has come out in favor of Civil Unions but is solidly against same sex marriage. If the "Civil Union" he favors includes all the rights and benefits of marriage, that would not set me against him.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:07 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    RickyRicky pull em out of his poo poo hole !
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:08 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif




    LOL!
    How flattering that you actually believe that I had something to do with the production of these polls.

    You're free to post other polls that show Christie as more popular than Cuomo.
  • Life_Is_Good_...

    Posts: 109

    Jun 13, 2011 4:14 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:24 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.
  • jlly_rnchr

    Posts: 1759

    Jun 13, 2011 4:29 AM GMT
    SDGMAN saidI do not have enough information on Mr. Christie to form an educated opinion. He has come out in favor of Civil Unions but is solidly against same sex marriage. If the "Civil Union" he favors includes all the rights and benefits of marriage, that would not set me against him.


    I don't think civil unions are recognized by the federal gov't, so they never have all the rights and benefits of marriage. But Mr. Christie did promise to veto same sex marriage if it came across his desk, which is enough for me to dislike him.
  • Life_Is_Good_...

    Posts: 109

    Jun 13, 2011 4:43 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:51 AM GMT
    I like christie a lot
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:52 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?


    It worked well, It lasted for about 15 minutes. And you had expectations of?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:54 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.

    as I said Ricky, if you can't take it, then don't dish it

    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.
    Kinda like pink strawberry or something?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:56 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.



    He confuses emotions with facts.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 4:59 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 5:03 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.


    Little RickyRicky, You wonder how all that got started sweetie? As I've said a few hundred times, if you can't take it, then don't dish it.

    "you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub."

    Good Grief, can you even imagine the democrats doing something like that? No way!!!

    "check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    "

    And be sure to check out the posts preceding mine and it will all start to make sense.
  • Life_Is_Good_...

    Posts: 109

    Jun 13, 2011 5:30 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.









  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 5:38 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 5:40 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.



    Very funny and who knows, maybe you'll get through. My being nice didn't work so I'll try this.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 5:43 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.


    Ricky !!!!! Be nice. Just once honey, try it. You might be surprised how folks respond.
  • Life_Is_Good_...

    Posts: 109

    Jun 13, 2011 5:55 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.


    rickrick91,

    True, I did open my argument with emotion sine an apology is the truest of emotions. I apologized for getting your name incorrect. (I would also like to apologize to the other 91+ rickrick's out there for misspelling your handle) My bad. (or was it an attempt to get you to fly off the handle or accept my apology as sincere without reaction to minor errors).

    My later paragraph was not my first response so I did think before firing. I took time to think through my response.

    Life is too short to be angry all the time. Sometimes you need to duck and be like a duck. Let it flow off your back.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 5:57 AM GMT
    OldGeezer said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.


    Ricky !!!!! Be nice. Just once honey, try it. You might be surprised how folks respond.




    LOL!
    After you!
    You set the tone.
    You'll get back exactly what you dish out.
    When you stop posting ugly homophobic and demeaning insults, then maybe folks will start being "nice" to you.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2011 6:04 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.


    rickrick91,

    True, I did open my argument with emotion sine an apology is the truest of emotions. I apologized for getting your name incorrect. (I would also like to apologize to the other 91+ rickrick's out there for misspelling your handle) My bad. (or was it an attempt to get you to fly off the handle or accept my apology as sincere without reaction to minor errors).

    My later paragraph was not my first response so I did think before firing. I took time to think through my response.

    Life is too short to be angry all the time. Sometimes you need to duck and be like a duck. Let it flow off your back.




    I have no anger whatsoever.
    You posted an attack on me.
    You started it - not me.
    The anger began with your angry attack on me which came out of the blue.
    I merely defended myself and corrected your misimpression.

    Perhaps you need to take your own advice more often instead of telling other people how to live their lives?
    If you had "let it flow off your back" instead of posting an attack on me, none of this would have happened at all!
  • Life_Is_Good_...

    Posts: 109

    Jun 13, 2011 6:22 AM GMT
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.


    rickrick91,

    True, I did open my argument with emotion sine an apology is the truest of emotions. I apologized for getting your name incorrect. (I would also like to apologize to the other 91+ rickrick's out there for misspelling your handle) My bad. (or was it an attempt to get you to fly off the handle or accept my apology as sincere without reaction to minor errors).

    My later paragraph was not my first response so I did think before firing. I took time to think through my response.

    Life is too short to be angry all the time. Sometimes you need to duck and be like a duck. Let it flow off your back.




    I have no anger whatsoever.
    You posted an attack on me.
    You started it - not me.
    The anger began with your angry attack on me which came out of the blue.
    I merely defended myself and corrected your misimpression.

    Perhaps you need to take your own advice more often instead of telling other people how to live their lives?
    If you had "let it flow off your back" instead of posting an attack on me, none of this would have happened at all!


    you posted you response on an open forum. you made it public and invited the response and dialog. If this was to be a "private conversation" than you should have taken it off line and had it in private.

    chat rooms and open forums are here to express and discuss and banter back and forth topics, ideas and information. you started this post but are not pleased with the responses.

  • Life_Is_Good_...

    Posts: 109

    Jun 13, 2011 6:28 AM GMT
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    rickrick91 said
    Life_Is_Good_San_Diego said
    CuriousJockAZ saidNow Geezer, c'mon, you know RickRick's polls are beyond reproach. icon_rolleyes.gif


    what happened to the opened mind and no inflammatory rhetoric we all agreed not to spew?




    As long as Geezer is on the blog threads, there will be no way to keep the threads spew-free.
    Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks, but he goes beyond anyone else I've encountered.
    Plus, his attacks are often laced with a hateful anti-gay flavor.


    Than use his handle "OlgGeezer" so you do not become that which you dislike!

    Truncating his name in an obvious attempt to insult only brings you to a level you would believe is below him. Make your argument in return with facts not off the cuffs emotion. Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotions.





    You'll have some credibilty my friend when and if you post the exact same criticism of Geezer.
    He calls me "RickyRicky" - and much worse shit.
    RickyRicky is not a part of my handle.
    And he posts much worse shit about other RJ members on a regular basis.

    BTW - Geezer is part of his name!
    A name that he chose for himself.
    The degrading names he calls others are not portions of the handles they chose.

    Geezer's standard of behavior is the worst I've seen on these blog threads.

    As of now, you merely look like a partisan Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub.
    If you want to be taken seriously as a non partisan critic - check out all of Geezer's posts and take him to task for what he's posted.
    Until then you have no credibilty as an impartial voice.

    And if you actually take the time to read Geezer's posts and compare them to mine, you'll find that mine contain more facts and links to info than his do, and nowhere near as many personal attacks.


    rickyrick91, I apologize for not catching the truncating of your name. That is my error. Unfortunately I based my response to the topic at hand and not the unknown history between the two of you.

    You claim "Nobody can claim to be completely free of posting attacks".

    My first response to you was:

    "Based on your assumptions about me I have determined you were a twit born to an unwed mother who dropped you on your head at birth because she had to choose between her crack pipe or you to drop. If this is untrue please clarify your inability to create an argument with facts at hand and not low brow insults."

    But I decided not to make it my first response.

    I do not spend my time here on line reading his posts. ( Maybe you two need to rent a room and get it over with).

    I make my own decisions on topics by researching all sides of the story ( I love the internet).

    Think before you fire and keep your powder dry.

    You will win more hearts with a good argument than a bad defense.













    It's unfortunate that you don't take your own advice about thinking before you fire.
    You fired without thinking and posted a comment that was based on your emotions.
    You didn't bother about gathering the facts.
    For someone who posted the words "Proving an argument with facts wins more followers than arguing with pure emotion", it's rather hypocritical of you to be posting comments based on your emotions and impression of things rather than on "the facts".

    And, my handle is rickrick91 - NOT "rickyrick91", as you stated.
    Again, you don't really seem to be as concerned about the facts as you urge others to be.

    Frankly, your comment as a whole is both bad argument and bad defense.


    rickrick91,

    True, I did open my argument with emotion sine an apology is the truest of emotions. I apologized for getting your name incorrect. (I would also like to apologize to the other 91+ rickrick's out there for misspelling your handle) My bad. (or was it an attempt to get you to fly off the handle or accept my apology as sincere without reaction to minor errors).

    My later paragraph was not my first response so I did think before firing. I took time to think through my response.

    Life is too short to be angry all the time. Sometimes you need to duck and be like a duck. Let it flow off your back.




    I have no anger whatsoever.
    You posted an attack on me.
    You started it - not me.
    The anger began with your angry attack on me which came out of the blue.
    I merely defended myself and corrected your misimpression.

    Perhaps you need to take your own advice more often instead of telling other people how to live their lives?
    If you had "let it flow off your back" instead of posting an attack on me, none of this would have happened at all!


    you posted you response on an open forum. you made it public and invited the response and dialog. If this was to be a "private conversation" than you should have taken it off line and had it in private.

    chat rooms and open forums are here to express and discuss and banter back and forth topics, ideas and information. you started this post but are not pleased with the responses.



    PS: when do you think you will have time to be "verified". you accuse me of being a "Repub sticking up for a fellow partisan Repub" without any proof. I have gone through the process to verify myself per the requirements of the originators of this site. Based on your argument you must be a "partisan Lib". Why are you so shy? Hiding your true self? Is it because you were caught sending a photo of your wiener out to under age girls?

    just checking.