Silly liberals and their so-called "Facts"

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 25, 2011 1:18 AM GMT
    http://plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/06/silly-liberals-and-their-so-called.htmlJonathan Chait is sadly misinformed about economic history and taxation levels over the last thirty years.

    He writes that conservatives opposed tax hikes in 1982 and claimed they would derail recovery; that conservatives opposed Bill Clinton's tax hikes in 1993 and claimed they would tank the economy; and supported George W. Bush's tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, claiming that they would spur economic growth -- but that each time, the opposite happened.

    This is obviously wrong.

    Bill Clinton's tax hikes in 1993 pretty clearly caused the 2001 recession, and despite the heroic efforts of Republicans, the hangover from those tax hikes moderated the otherwise exceptional growth rates of the Bush years. I mean, the Bush years between recession and even bigger recession. Which we'll get to later.

    So why did the economy grow so fast in the 1990s? No question about that -- it grew because of the Reagan tax cuts of 1981. Now, granted, those tax cuts couldn't prevent a recession in 1990-1991, which was caused by Clinton's tax increases in 1993, but the effects of the Reagan tax cuts kicked back in again around 1994 and resulted in several years of excellent growth.

    Now, what about that 1982 tax increase? That's easy: if we never speak about it, then it didn't really happen, and it can't really affect economic growth. Indeed, Chait risks contributing to the current economic tough times by mentioning it now, and potentially risking the economic confidence about taxes that is the only reason employers ever hire anyone.

    If you've understood everything so far, it should be pretty easy to deduce why the economy fell into another recession in late 2007. George W. Bush was term-limited, and the odds were high that Barack Obama would soon be president and usher in an era of unprecedented tax increases. Faced with that inevitability, no wonder the economy collapsed! The Obama tax increases were devastating, and businesses in 2007 were helpless in their wake, rippling backwards through time.

    So Chait (and Bruce Bartlett, who is obviously a liberal for believing this stuff) have it all wrong: it's liberals like them who can't learn the simple, straightforward lessons of history.


    icon_lol.gif
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Jun 25, 2011 2:17 AM GMT
    A) You're painting ALL liberals with the same brush
    B) You're presenting OPINION as fact.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 25, 2011 2:20 AM GMT
    Read a little bit closer, Webster. It's actually quite a good piece of satire.icon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 25, 2011 4:09 AM GMT
    Webster666 saidA) You're painting ALL liberals with the same brush
    B) You're presenting OPINION as fact.


    But thats exactly what the libs do to the republicans paint them all with the same brush, and confuse facts with opinions; albeit most opinions are those of hate to bastardise.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 25, 2011 4:14 AM GMT
    q1w2e3 saidRead a little bit closer, Webster. It's actually quite a good piece of satire.icon_lol.gif




    And painfully truthful.
    It's like we've been seeing for the past couple of years:
    THE REPUBS WILL SAY ANYTHING.

    They will spin lie and rewrite history if necessary - to try to cover their asses and make their record of economic failure after economic failure for the past 30 years - look better.

    Every word they say must be fact checked.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 25, 2011 1:30 PM GMT
    Webster, you need to look at the line about the Obama tax increases and their effect on businesses in ......2007!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 25, 2011 1:36 PM GMT
    Yeah, I even went back and highlighted the obviously satirical parts for those who missed it.

    Came across this from Ezra Klein's blog:

    "Yes, that’s satire. But it’s a view of the world that fits current Republican policies much better than, well, the actual world."