Online You Can Be a Successful Republican Businessman while living on the food stamp down-low.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2011 10:50 PM GMT
    LYING....online! I know, it's a real shocker. But one of my RJ locals is using his fake online persona in a particularly annoying way.

    It actually doesn't bother me that he pretends to great wealth, a home in Switzerland and a thriving international business----though I do pity the golddigger whom he might attract.

    What I find offensive is that he's posting mocking advice to those with money concerns...and his 'self-made millionaire' perspective in the political forums.

    This Millionaire is an unemployed fake. I have met him in person and he says his hobby is to annoy Liberals. And no he has no business and no home in Switzerland.

    SO BE AWARE......before you take some of these 'Self-made...No Handouts...etc. Conservatives' too seriously, you really don't know their story til you've met them.

    Hmmmmm, which has also led me to wonder about the 'very, very busy conservative businessmen' here who manage to post a hundred attack screeds per day???????

    Just curious.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 16, 2011 10:58 PM GMT
    I know who you're talking about. But how do you know he lives on food stamps?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2011 11:03 PM GMT
    jprichva saidI've suspected twomack was a fake from the beginning. Or whatever he calls himself now. Too bad I can't remember what thread I posted that it or I'd dig it up. It was a couple of years ago already.


    LOL. I'm not surprised at all.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 2:40 PM GMT
    Oh that's too hilarious!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 2:56 PM GMT
    How do we know the OP isn't himself making this up? If he did meet the other member, why would the other member make such a confession, knowing it would be mentioned here? If the other member did not make such a confession, how would the OP know he was on food stamps. If he was behind him in line in the supermarket, would the other member say 'Hi, I'm xxx on RJ. Oh, excuse me, I have to get out my food stamps to pay." Why would he confess to having no homes as he claimed and being unemployed?

    The OP already modified his post to remove his allegation that the other member is on food stamps. But the first message in reply already mentioned it, and I remember seeing it yesterday. Why did he post that and then retract it?

    I have no need to defend anyone, but I'm sensing a lot of BS on the part of the OP. And when you lie in one area, there is the presumption that you are lying in other areas as well. Raises the question on whose profile is really the fake one.

    There may be a lot of BS on the internet, but doesn't something basic such as the OP's message raise any questions as to its believability?
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 17, 2011 2:58 PM GMT
    I wonder if the others know. He supposedly owes socalfitness a drink. But with his delicate condition, maybe socal should pay instead.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 17, 2011 3:00 PM GMT
    socalfitness saidHow do we know the OP isn't himself making this up? If he did meet the other member, why would the other member make such a confession, knowing it would be mentioned here? If the other member did not make such a confession, how would the OP know he was on food stamps. If he was behind him in line in the supermarket, would the other member say 'Hi, I'm xxx on RJ. Oh, excuse me, I have to get out my food stamps to pay." Why would he confess to having no homes as he claimed and being unemployed?

    The OP already modified his post to remove his allegation that the other member is on food stamps. But the first message in reply already mentioned it, and I remember seeing it yesterday. Why did he post that and then retract it?

    I have no need to defend anyone, but I'm sensing a lot of BS on the part of the OP. And when you lie in one area, there is the presumption that you are lying in other areas as well. Raises the question on whose profile is really the fake one.

    There may be a lot of BS on the internet, but doesn't something basic such as the OP's message raise any questions as to its believability?


    The food stamps part is mentioned in the title of the thread. It was never mentioned in the actual post.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 3:16 PM GMT
    creature said
    socalfitness saidHow do we know the OP isn't himself making this up? If he did meet the other member, why would the other member make such a confession, knowing it would be mentioned here? If the other member did not make such a confession, how would the OP know he was on food stamps. If he was behind him in line in the supermarket, would the other member say 'Hi, I'm xxx on RJ. Oh, excuse me, I have to get out my food stamps to pay." Why would he confess to having no homes as he claimed and being unemployed?

    The OP already modified his post to remove his allegation that the other member is on food stamps. But the first message in reply already mentioned it, and I remember seeing it yesterday. Why did he post that and then retract it?

    I have no need to defend anyone, but I'm sensing a lot of BS on the part of the OP. And when you lie in one area, there is the presumption that you are lying in other areas as well. Raises the question on whose profile is really the fake one.

    There may be a lot of BS on the internet, but doesn't something basic such as the OP's message raise any questions as to its believability?


    The food stamps part is mentioned in the title of the thread. It was never mentioned in the actual post.

    OK, concede that point, but the overall question remains. There would have to direct evidence, not second or third hand gossip.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 3:51 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    creature said
    socalfitness saidHow do we know the OP isn't himself making this up? If he did meet the other member, why would the other member make such a confession, knowing it would be mentioned here? If the other member did not make such a confession, how would the OP know he was on food stamps. If he was behind him in line in the supermarket, would the other member say 'Hi, I'm xxx on RJ. Oh, excuse me, I have to get out my food stamps to pay." Why would he confess to having no homes as he claimed and being unemployed?

    The OP already modified his post to remove his allegation that the other member is on food stamps. But the first message in reply already mentioned it, and I remember seeing it yesterday. Why did he post that and then retract it?

    I have no need to defend anyone, but I'm sensing a lot of BS on the part of the OP. And when you lie in one area, there is the presumption that you are lying in other areas as well. Raises the question on whose profile is really the fake one.

    There may be a lot of BS on the internet, but doesn't something basic such as the OP's message raise any questions as to its believability?


    The food stamps part is mentioned in the title of the thread. It was never mentioned in the actual post.

    OK, concede that point, but the overall question remains. There would have to direct evidence, not second or third hand gossip.


    Well, the OP says they've met in person and he confessed that his hobby is to annoy liberals. Perhaps he confessed to other things as well.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 4:04 PM GMT
    I wonder if twomack/conservativejock has seen this topic yet...
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 17, 2011 4:41 PM GMT
    meninlove said I wonder if twomack/conservativejock has seen this topic yet...


    I don't see why not. He should still be able to afford to pay attention.

    1286703464-giggling-cat-funny-picture.jp
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 4:57 PM GMT
    Christian73 said
    socalfitness said
    creature said
    socalfitness saidHow do we know the OP isn't himself making this up? If he did meet the other member, why would the other member make such a confession, knowing it would be mentioned here? If the other member did not make such a confession, how would the OP know he was on food stamps. If he was behind him in line in the supermarket, would the other member say 'Hi, I'm xxx on RJ. Oh, excuse me, I have to get out my food stamps to pay." Why would he confess to having no homes as he claimed and being unemployed?

    The OP already modified his post to remove his allegation that the other member is on food stamps. But the first message in reply already mentioned it, and I remember seeing it yesterday. Why did he post that and then retract it?

    I have no need to defend anyone, but I'm sensing a lot of BS on the part of the OP. And when you lie in one area, there is the presumption that you are lying in other areas as well. Raises the question on whose profile is really the fake one.

    There may be a lot of BS on the internet, but doesn't something basic such as the OP's message raise any questions as to its believability?


    The food stamps part is mentioned in the title of the thread. It was never mentioned in the actual post.

    OK, concede that point, but the overall question remains. There would have to direct evidence, not second or third hand gossip.


    Well, the OP says they've met in person and he confessed that his hobby is to annoy liberals. Perhaps he confessed to other things as well.

    "Perhaps" is the key word. Why would he confess to such a thing? Is it really plausible that he would say all is a lie, that he is unemployed and on food stamps? Aside from what you might want to believe, the OP message doesn't pass the common sense test. At this point I think the OP is lying.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 17, 2011 5:06 PM GMT
    I sent the OP an e-mail a short while ago. I too was curious how the meeting came to be. Seemed strange the person in question would agree to meet anyone unless they are as conservative as he is.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 5:25 PM GMT
    jprichva saidI'm not sure socal would believe it even if twomack admitted it.

    Too much invested.

    Not the case at all. Just looking at the "evidence" which to me doesn't pass muster. And if the OP is lying, that should be exposed.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 5:28 PM GMT
    creature saidI sent the OP an e-mail a short while ago. I too was curious how the meeting came to be. Seemed strange the person in question would agree to meet anyone unless they are as conservative as he is.

    Not just that but neither has public face pics so if they just happened to meet, unless it was at a gay function, can't imagine the topic of RJ would even come up.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 6:48 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    creature saidI sent the OP an e-mail a short while ago. I too was curious how the meeting came to be. Seemed strange the person in question would agree to meet anyone unless they are as conservative as he is.

    Not just that but neither has public face pics so if they just happened to meet, unless it was at a gay function, can't imagine the topic of RJ would even come up.



    It wouldn't matter if they did have pics socal. Remember tynificent? You were quite impressed and he was fake.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 6:53 PM GMT
    meninlove said
    socalfitness said
    creature saidI sent the OP an e-mail a short while ago. I too was curious how the meeting came to be. Seemed strange the person in question would agree to meet anyone unless they are as conservative as he is.

    Not just that but neither has public face pics so if they just happened to meet, unless it was at a gay function, can't imagine the topic of RJ would even come up.



    It wouldn't matter if they did have pics socal. Remember tynificent? You were quite impressed and he was fake.


    My point pertained to the implausibility of them meeting and discussing what led to the OP message.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 6:59 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    meninlove said
    socalfitness said
    creature saidI sent the OP an e-mail a short while ago. I too was curious how the meeting came to be. Seemed strange the person in question would agree to meet anyone unless they are as conservative as he is.

    Not just that but neither has public face pics so if they just happened to meet, unless it was at a gay function, can't imagine the topic of RJ would even come up.



    It wouldn't matter if they did have pics socal. Remember tynificent? You were quite impressed and he was fake.


    My point pertained to the implausibility of them meeting and discussing what led to the OP message.



    You're assuming they
    a) met on RJ
    b) never knew each other outside of RJ until recently

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 7:02 PM GMT
    meninlove said
    socalfitness said
    meninlove said
    socalfitness said
    creature saidI sent the OP an e-mail a short while ago. I too was curious how the meeting came to be. Seemed strange the person in question would agree to meet anyone unless they are as conservative as he is.

    Not just that but neither has public face pics so if they just happened to meet, unless it was at a gay function, can't imagine the topic of RJ would even come up.



    It wouldn't matter if they did have pics socal. Remember tynificent? You were quite impressed and he was fake.


    My point pertained to the implausibility of them meeting and discussing what led to the OP message.

    You're assuming they
    a) met on RJ
    b) never knew each other outside of RJ until recently


    True. Interested in any addl info forthcoming. As it stands, it doesn't hold up any more than someone concocting an allegation.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 17, 2011 7:05 PM GMT
    I received my reply from PresentMind. It's true.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 7:05 PM GMT
    ...which is why we said nothing about it earlier on this topic other than asking if conservativejock has seen it yet. He's currently offline.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 7:06 PM GMT
    creature saidI received my reply from PresentMind. It's true.



    Uh oh...
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19133

    Aug 17, 2011 7:10 PM GMT
    PresentMind saidI have met him in person and he says his hobby is to annoy Liberals.



    Pictures or it never happened icon_lol.gif I have the presence of mind to not believe a word said by PresentMind. Seems like nothing more than an attempt to stir the pot. Where and when did they meet? Last night? If not, why the wait to expose this alleged fraud?
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Aug 17, 2011 7:14 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    PresentMind saidI have met him in person and he says his hobby is to annoy Liberals.



    Pictures or it never happened icon_lol.gif I have the presence of mind to not believe a word said by PresentMind. Seems like nothing more than an attempt to stir the pot. Where and when did they meet? Last night? If not, why the wait to expose this alleged fraud?


    The "wait" can be found in the original post where he said "I find offensive is that he's posting mocking advice to those with money concerns...and his 'self-made millionaire' perspective in the political forums."

    I think that advice conservativejock gave must have been recent which prompted this outing. Conservativejock did drop hints about his alleged wealth recently when he spoke about having a hanger for his supposed plane. He does that sort of thing from time to time. And PresentMind hasn't always been an active member in the forums like he is today.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2011 7:17 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    PresentMind saidI have met him in person and he says his hobby is to annoy Liberals.



    Pictures or it never happened icon_lol.gif I have the presence of mind to not believe a word said by PresentMind. Seems like nothing more than an attempt to stir the pot. Where and when did they meet? Last night? If not, why the wait to expose this alleged fraud?

    Agreed, and just cause he also says so in an email to Creature provides no addl validity. I have no dog in the fight and no need to defend or protect anyone, but I have also had interaction in the threads with PresentMind and would not believe him without solid proof. Also surprised how many of you are quick to believe without a shred of evidence.