Bareback Porn

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 12:12 AM GMT
    This wasn't the topic I thought I'd start. But I listened to Dan Savage's podcast (Savage Love #81 http://podcasts.thestranger.com/savagelove/) and he was responding to a question of bareback porn. He seemed to be repeating comments he made a couple weeks ago here: http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/bareback_porn_child_porn

    I've heard several people say that they like to watch bareback porn, even though they wouldn't have bareback sex themselves. But Dan's point is that any demand for it increases the offers to young, inexperienced boys/men to do it for only a little bit of money per movie.

    Agree/disagree? Does watching bareback porn increase the spread of STIs for those performing?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 12:18 AM GMT
    yep, i know some of them personally
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 12:18 AM GMT
    I watched it, but, I don't demand it my self, rubbered or not, I'm not entirely fused. I always wear a rubber though.

    I don't get how being without a rubber gets them any closer to me, there cock is in my arse and I'm moaning my head off and its totally because of what there doing, at that moment where I'm in heaven I would do almost anything for them.. its totally about them.. I'm sorry but I don't see how they are gonna get any closer to me then at that moment!

    Well, its me, I'm getting off of course, but I'm thinking about them hehe.

    No, I think, that if its healthier for the porn stars to use a rubber then they should use a rubber.

    http://www.safesexishotsex.com/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 12:21 AM GMT
    Watching bareback porn certainly doesn't increase the spread of std's but I think that it does increase the desire in the young to do it.

    It's my opinion that filming bareback porn is irresponsible for everyone involved. Including those that rent/buy it.

    That being said... Watching porn where there are a bunch of guys blowing each other seems to send the message that you can't get std's from doing that. And god knows how much fun sucking on a rubber is, NOT. And who wants an std all the way down their throat.

    When it comes down to it, I guess that it's everyone for themselves. We're all responsible for our own actions. But I really don't like the message sent out by promoting unprotected sex. Especially to some of these kids that are just coming out in this beautiful yet cruel world.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 3:44 AM GMT
    Remember kids: STDs are BOP! icon_razz.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 1:49 PM GMT
    Yes unfortunately. I find it now difficult to find porn that is not bareback.

    Being HIV+ and someone who lived through the 80's, to see two guys have unprotected anal sex is very surreal. It is like gay men are now suffering from collective amnesia.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 3:06 PM GMT
    I do believe that bareback is the fastest growing segment of the gay porn industry. Rates of HIV infection are also on the rise with 38% of total cases coming from gay men. So, I agree with Dan that it endangers the actors and creates a demand, but in addition porn is contributing to the fetishization of bareback.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 6:23 PM GMT
    Yes and no. Because the demand for the porn is there there is a demand for actors to preform it. The issue is these actors seem to have no desire to protect themselves and in many cases are violating laws of the states they film in. There are several states which require the actors to be bath in between shots and wear protection.

    The studios get away with it by film in states that dont have those laws, or sometimes they just dont disclose the facts to the state.

    The other issue is some studios have a policy of auto assumption and assume all their actors are HIV+. This allows them to claim an ignorance defense in court if an actor sues after he becomes infected. Or in the case of a hetero couple where the husband was a gay BB actor and infected his wife. His wife tried to sue but lost because the studio claimed they believed all they actors are positive to begin with when they signed the contract. She did win the suit against her husband and he is facing 15years in jail for attempted murder. He knew he was infected and was being treated for years wo his wifes knowledge.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 8:54 PM GMT
    I think (and I'm willing to be educated otherwise), I'm not buying the "irresponsible consumer" argument whether its bareback porn, kiddie porn, or snuff porn.

    If one consumer were to stop purchasing these products, it would not make a dent in the demand. If thousands did in a concerted action, it would, but what miracle would it take for thousands to act in concert? We're not conditioned to act in concert except as part of "the consuming public."

    I'm not saying someone who gets off watching kidsex or grotesque violence and murder might not want to look at that themselves, I just can't buy the "objectively" or "socially" irresponsible position.

    Charlie
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 8:55 PM GMT
    P.S. I don't get into or watch any of the media mentioned in my previous post.

    Charlie
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 09, 2008 9:05 PM GMT
    with its lots of free samples, definately jakecruise.com
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2008 7:59 PM GMT
    sg4ge.com this is another site of jake cruise. this site is for male pornstars who refuse to fuck guys. the camera focuses on male pornstar. sooo sg4ge ,straight guys for gay eyes.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2008 8:29 PM GMT
    lucaskazan.com lucaskazan.tv italian heatwave
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 23, 2008 6:49 PM GMT
    jetsetmen.com
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 08, 2008 7:21 PM GMT
    codycummings.com he is the man.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 09, 2008 12:22 PM GMT
    Buckwheet saidRemember kids: STDs are BOP! icon_razz.gif


    What's a BOP, daddy? icon_confused.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 09, 2008 12:38 PM GMT
    She BOP ba loo BOP? I hope he would understand...
  • zakariahzol

    Posts: 2241

    Jun 09, 2008 1:06 PM GMT
    Bareback porn is a something forbidden and dangerous . Of course something in that nature invited attention and curiosity. Personally, I was never interested looking at porn where they have the condom on. The way I see it , this porn actor get paid good money to do something fun and not required hard work. The risk they take is what the pay for. Just like some prostitute taking risk by being with so many man.

    My favourite porn site is Machofucker.com. All big dick, big muscle , rough sex and no condom. Of course I will never take the risk doing something as stupid as barebacking myself.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 10, 2008 4:39 AM GMT
    A friend of mine knows people in the porn industry, and he says they make sure the actors get tested and have to be HIV negative before they "do it". Wonder if that's true?

    Still, I agree it does send out the wrong message especially to young people, like denial or something, that HIV isn't anything to be all concerned about anymore.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 10, 2008 10:47 PM GMT
    That's kind of crazy because there is still a time period (up to 3 months) that the virus can go undected in the body.

    Maybe they just don't care if they get infected which is stupid!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 10, 2008 11:07 PM GMT
    Hmmmm. Condoms in straight porn are more of a fetish than standard operating procedure but I rarely hear anyone on a soap box about that.

    I suppose straights have some sort of innate defense against STIs that are missing in the gay gene.

    Anyway, I suppose it is a matter of personal preference on the actors, studios, and consumer. If there is a demand - they will cum.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 11, 2008 5:40 AM GMT
    So true about straight porn and in fact the straight world. No-one thinks straight people are irresponsible for not using condoms. How else would women get pregnant?

    I doubt that these young porn stars see themselves at risk from STDS, I mean it's only older guys that get things like that, right?

    I think it makes barebacking more acceptable to guys and makes it seem like HIV and STDs don't exist.

    Porn is fantasy some people have trouble distinguishing it from reality.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 23, 2012 9:28 AM GMT
    1969er saidI've heard several people say that they like to watch bareback porn icon_evil.gif, even though they wouldn't have bareback sex themselves.


    You can count me in that goup. I have never gone bare, but I love watching bb porn. I like to fantasize that I am actually watching a guy serconvert on film.icon_evil.gif
  • metta

    Posts: 39104

    Feb 20, 2013 8:53 PM GMT
    Barebacking in gay porn; behind the scenes- part 1



    Barebacking in gay porn: part 2
  • WApilot

    Posts: 191

    Mar 25, 2013 9:37 AM GMT
    I've met a ton of gay porn actors thanks to a buddy of mine that works for Titan, but I will say, that porn is not a 'hot to guide' to sex in the gay community and just like having to put a warning label on tobacco, there's warning labels at the beginning of a barebacking scene.

    Personal responsibility is what should be questioned and why people want to blame others for an individuals bad decision making. BB porn has a market and if the people didn't want it, I'm pretty sure the studios wouldn't be producing it to begin with. Also, this goes without saying, just because you have bareback sex, it doesn't automatically mean you're gonna get an STI or worse HIV. In a controlled environment, proper testing, one could easily reduce risk, but again, it's always a risk, even if you wear a condom. (Not advocating for people to not wear a condom)

    If the actors in question decide to do a bareback scene, they are fully aware of the risk involved. Anyone who comes out later saying they made a mistake, it's their mistake, not anyone elses.