Clean air???

  • MikemikeMike

    Posts: 6932

    Sep 08, 2011 1:36 PM GMT
    In Gore's Wednesday post, he writes:

    Instead of relying on science, President Obama appears to have bowed to pressure from polluters who did not want to bear the cost of implementing new restrictions on their harmful pollution—even though economists have shown that the US economy would benefit from the job creating investments associated with implementing the new technology. The result of the White House’s action will be increased medical bills for seniors with lung disease, more children developing asthma, and the continued degradation of our air quality.

    Gore also mentions that fact that on the very day that Obama made this announcement, activists were outside the White House engaged in protests against the Keystone XL pipeline, which is expected to run from the Canadian tar sands in Alberta to refineries on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Over the course of two weeks, over 1,200 people were arrested for their acts of non-violent civil disobedience. In a recent HuffPost piece, Gore wrote, "The tar sands are the dirtiest source of fuel on the planet."

    Many others have spoken out against Obama's decision, including Robert Redford, who wrote for The Huffington Post that "President Obama has done a lot to protect public health and our environment," but "I want our smog levels to come down so more of our children and seniors can breathe clean air. Putting corporate profits above public health is unconscionable. It's outrageous that it would be countenanced -- by this president or any other."

    Keith Olbermann slammed President Obama on his Friday show, asking, "What the hell is going on in the White House?"

    Glad I don't live in LA!!

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 08, 2011 6:17 PM GMT
    Takeaway: Even us here in the center-left know Obama is lousy. Doi.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 08, 2011 8:49 PM GMT
    I'm sorry, Mike, but who's fault is it that is pushing for "compromise" on environmental issues, profit uber alles, and abolition of the EPA?