Bowyn_Aerrow saidI prefer muscly-fat type guys. Some would say 'muscle-bear' I suppose.
I think a good way to explain it: there was (might still be I rarely watch TV anymore) the 'Worlds strongest Man'. Most of them were thick,bulky but not body builders with near 0% body fat and veins sticking out all over. They have muscle, but its under a layer of flesh, so they have more mass, but far less definition.
The highly cut, 0% body fat looks more unnatural than a guy who has muscle under a nominal layer of fat. At least to me.
This body:
is more appealing than this body.
This personal preference is 'hard won' I had a near 5 year relationship with a guy who wanted to look like the Incredible Hulk sans the green skin. He was heavy into the 'cut and definition' and pretty much turned out to be pretty much an a-hole. He ended up talking with his fists, unfortunately he liked to talk a lot.
Due to him, I see lots of cut and definition and I immediately think back to the days when I was with that guy. I connect his personality with the body.
BTW bodybuilders who compete often gain a lot of 'fat' off season. They do highly strict diets to shave off all the sub-dermal fat in order to be on stage.
Arnold was around 235# for competing, off season he was on average 260-265 That's 25-30 pounds of fat. Others have even more distance, around 50 pounds.
Fat does play many crucial rolls and should not be ignored. Even intramuscular fat (that which gives red meat its marbled appearance) also plays a roll in over all muscle health.
rnch saidBowyn_Aerrow saidI prefer
i wouldn't kick either one of these hunks outta bed!
Bowyn_Aerrow saidI prefer muscly-fat type guys. Some would say 'muscle-bear' I suppose.
I think a good way to explain it: there was (might still be I rarely watch TV anymore) the 'Worlds strongest Man'. Most of them were thick,bulky but not body builders with near 0% body fat and veins sticking out all over. They have muscle, but its under a layer of flesh, so they have more mass, but far less definition.
purelife saidI've been bulking up for the past month and a half.. gaining size.. I also don't always eat the cleanest diet in the winter months. Nothing over 20% body fat. I always get more attention when I cut down. I also think I should take guys that show interest in me when I bulk more seriously. Am I right in thinking this way? Should I be using a bulk as a shit test? and would you guys be interested in a guy that bulks dirty?what do you mean bulk up dirty? as for what i am attracted too. i can be attracted to both. however, i tend to like the muscular but not cut look.
xrichx saidBulk up dirty.. Never heard it phrased this way. Lay down some beats, and it can be a rap song.
thenes saidI would. In fact, I think I prefer it. Allowing yourself to enjoy "dirty" foods while bulking is a portion of the fun. And it doesn't sound like you're going very dirty at all. 20%? You're still practically clean.
MindAndMatter saidMaybe you can bulk up "dirty", as you say, and then take this drug that is always advertised on this site lately (irrespective of your HIV status):
EGRIFTA® is an injectable prescription medicine to reduce the excess in abdominal fat in HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy. EGRIFTA® contains a growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF).
Now THAT is playing DIRTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Copyright © 2006-2016 Family Powered Networks. All rights reserved
