mocktwinkie said Limbaugh made it very clear that Sandusky does not represent gay people just like heterosexual criminals don’t represent all heterosexuals.
You must ave a very odd definition of "very clear."
Limbaugh complaining that the Sandusky affair is considered a pedophile problem rather than a "homosexual problem or scandal" is obviously anti-gay homophobia. No amount of right-wing spin can change that.
No, he was saying that there's too much political correctness in terms of what he calls "the gay lobby" silencing anyone who merely points out the fact that sandusky is a homosexual pedophile.
If Sandusky was a "christian minister" molesting little girls the media would have constantly emphasized his being a "christian minister", but because Sandusky is "homosexual" and molesting boys the media would never even make a passing reference to orientation.
That's basically what he's trying to say in so many words.
And FYI, this thread was "spun" to begin with. The fact is, he didn't really say anything anti-gay.
First of all, there is no "gay lobby" or "gay mafia." Those are also homophobic terms used by right-wingers to drum up fear and thus hatred of gays as some powerful, secretive "other" plotting and conspiring against the traditional order. Fearmongering, hateful nonsense.
Certainly, there is no "gay lobby" surpressing mention of Sandusky's sexuality. To begin, nobody knows what Sandusky's sexual orientation is. He could be gay, straight, or bi. Or he may be asexual and only sexually interested in children.
I don't know. You don't know. Limbaugh doesn't know. He assumed Sandusky is gay because he is a homophobe who automatically associates pedophilia with homosexuality. It is nakedly anti-gay rhetoric and will be recognized as such by 99% of the people who hear it.
What if Sandusky was a "Christian minister"? Who cares? He's not. What he is, is a pedophile. Try to stay on topic.