Things to Tax

  • metta

    Posts: 39169

    Nov 29, 2011 10:53 PM GMT


    [quote]
    For example, a recent report by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center points out that before 1980 very-high-income individuals fell into tax brackets well above the 35 percent top rate that applies today. According to the center’s analysis, restoring those high-income brackets would have raised $78 billion in 2007, or more than half a percent of G.D.P. I’ve extrapolated that number using Congressional Budget Office projections, and what I get for the next decade is that high-income taxation could shave more than $1 trillion off the deficit.

    It’s instructive to compare that estimate with the savings from the kinds of proposals that are actually circulating in Washington these days. Consider, for example, proposals to raise the age of Medicare eligibility to 67, dealing a major blow to millions of Americans. How much money would that save?

    Well, none from the point of view of the nation as a whole, since we would be pushing seniors out of Medicare and into private insurance, which has substantially higher costs. True, it would reduce federal spending — but not by much. The budget office estimates that outlays would fall by only $125 billion over the next decade, as the age increase phased in. And even when fully phased in, this partial dismantling of Medicare would reduce the deficit only about a third as much as could be achieved with higher taxes on the very rich.

    So raising taxes on the very rich could make a serious contribution to deficit reduction. Don’t believe anyone who claims otherwise.
    [/quote]

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/opinion/krugman-things-to-tax.html?_r=1&ref=columnists
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 29, 2011 11:11 PM GMT
    I'm sure Krugman is also in favor of making sure that such alleged revenue increases will strictly go towards reducing our debt and not as life support for programs that need to be cut. icon_rolleyes.gif

    The sad reality is that any extra revenue which comes in from higher taxation just ends up being used for continued or more spending on programs.