Illinois: State of Embarrassment

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 08, 2011 3:21 AM GMT
    http://www.newgeography.com/content/002557-illinois-state-of-embarrassment

    Most critics of Barack Obama’s desultory performance the past three years trace it to his supposedly leftist ideology, lack of experience and even his personality quirks. But it would perhaps be more useful to look at the geography — of Chicago and the state of Illinois — that nurtured his career and shaped his approach to politics. Like with George W. Bush and Texas, this is a case where you can’t separate the man from the place.

    The Chicago imprint on Obama is unmistakable. His closest advisors are almost all products of the Windy City’s machine politic: ConsigliereValerie Jarrett; his first chief of staff, now Chicago Mayor, Rahm Emanuel; and his current chief of staff, longtime Chicago hackster William Daley, scion of the Windy City’s longtime ruling family.

    All these figures arose from a Chicago where corruption is so commonplace that it elicits winks, nods and even a kind of admiration. Since 1973, for example, 27 Chicago Aldermen have been convicted by U.S. Attorney of the Northern District of Illinois.

    That culture of corruption affects the rest of the state as well. Both Gov. George Ryan (who served from 1999 to 2003 and and his successor Ron Blagojevich have been convicted a major crimes. So have four of the state’s last eight governors. Blagojevich’s felonies are part and parcel of a political climate that also includes the also newly convicted Antonin “Tony” Rezko, a real estate speculator and early key Obama backer, sentenced late last month to a ten-year prison sentence.

    Crony capitalism constitutes the essential element of what the legendary columnist John Kass of the Chicago Tribune has labeled both the “Chicago way” and the “Illinois Combine”, not primarily an ideology-driven movement. The political system, he notes, “knows no party, only appetites.”

    Just look at the special favors granted to vested interests while the state has imposed a 65% boost in income taxes for middle class citizens. Companies like Boeing and United, which have head offices in Chicago, get tax breaks and incentives, while everyone else pays the full fare. This game is still afoot. Even as the state deficit persists, other big players such as the CME group, which operates the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Options and Sears are threatening to leave unless their taxes are also lowered.

    Thus it’s not surprising then that cronyism has become a hallmark of the Obama administration. Wall Street grandees, a key source of Obama campaign funders in 2008 and again now, have been treated to bailouts as well as monetary policies that have assured massive profits to the “too big to fail” crowed while devastating consumers and smaller banks.

    The evolving scandal over “green jobs” — with huge loans handed out to faithful campaign contributors — epitomizes the special dealing that has become an art form in the system of Chicago and Illinois politics. Beneficiaries include longtime Obama backers such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Google. Another scandal is building up around the telecom company LightSquared. This company, financed largely by key Obama donors, appears to have gained a leg up for a huge Pentagon contract due to White House pressure.

    If the Chicago system had proven an economic success, perhaps we could excuse Obama for bringing it to the rest of us. Most of us would put up with a bit of corruption and special dealing if the results were strong economic and employment growth.

    But the bare demographic and economic facts for both Chicago and Illinois reveal a stunning legacy of failure. Over the past decade, Illinois suffered the third highest loss of STEM (science, technology, engineering and math-related) jobs in the nation, barely beating out Delaware and Michigan. The rest of the job picture is also dismal: Over the past ten years, Illinois suffered the third largest loss of jobs of any state, losing over six percent of its employment.

    The state’s demographic picture also is dismal. In the last decade, Illinois lost population not only to sunbelt states such as Texas and Florida but actually managed to have negative migration even with places like California and New York, net losers to virtually everywhere else. In fact, Illinois had a positive net migration with only one major state, Michigan.

    Chicago and its Daley dictatorship has been much celebrated in the media – particularly after Obama’s election in everything from the liberal New Yorker to Fast Company, which named Chicago “city of the year” in 2008. The following year, the Windy City was deemed the best city for men by Askmen.com, for offering what it claimed was “the perfect balance between cosmopolitan and comfortable, combining all of the culture, entertainment and sophistication of an internationally renowned destination with an affordable lifestyle and down-to-earth work hard/play hard character.”

    Well, you can make that case, unless you happen to be searching for a job. Over the past decade, “the Chicago way” has proven more adept at getting good coverage than creating employment for its residents. In NewGeography's last cities rankings greater Chicago ranked 41st out of the 51 largest metropolitan areas. Between 2001 and 2011 it actually lost jobs. Since 2007 the region has lost more jobs than Detroit, and more than twice as many as New York. It has lost about as many jobs – 250,000 – as up and comer Houston has gained. In NewGeography's recent survey of high-tech growth, the Chicago region stood at a dismal 47th among the nation’s 51 largest metropolitan areas.

    Overall, Chicago Loop Alliance reports that private sector employment in the Loop, the core of the Chicago downtown area, fell from 338,000 to 275,000 between 2000 and 2010. Chicago’s core has fallen further behind, in capturing high end employment than its traditional rival, New York.

    This weak hand is also evident in the region’s strongly negative migration. According to the last Census, Chicago lost more than 200,000 people during the last decade. People are leaving the Chicago area not only for Sun Belt havens but to rising Midwest competitors like Indianapolis and Minneapolis, which offer better business climates, lower housing prices and cleaner governments, says local urban analyst Aaron Renn. Even perennial losers like Los Angeles and New York are net gainers with Chicago.

    Given this economic and demographic track record, it’s no big surprise that the City of Chicago and the State of Illinois face enormous fiscal pressures. The city is facing a deficit of about $650 million and the state’s unfunded future liabilities are upwards of $160 billion. The new taxes are on tap for state residents, according to Illinois Public Policy Institute, will cost the average Illinoisan a whole week’s earnings.

    One might hope this disastrous record might make President Obama consider taking a different path to governing our country. Yet sadly it appears that acknowledgement of failure is not part of the “Chicago way” — a denial that may cost us dearly in the years ahead.

    This piece first appeared at Forbes.com.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and is a distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University, and an adjunct fellow of the Legatum Institute in London. He is author of The City: A Global History. His newest book is The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, released in February, 2010.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 08, 2011 3:26 AM GMT
    This is sillier than your usual postings.

    And there is a simple answer to all of this: Publicly financed elections. Get the money out of politics and all the graft goes away.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 08, 2011 3:29 AM GMT
    Christian73 saidThis is sillier than your usual postings.

    And there is a simple answer to all of this: Publicly financed elections. Get the money out of politics and all the graft goes away.


    I continually find it amusing how threatened you feel by some of the articles I post. Publicly financed elections would hardly do away with the issues here - though it would give journalists, politicians, unions, churches, and a number of other established institutions greater power. Once again you show how inept the policies you advocate are.
  • Suetonius

    Posts: 1842

    Dec 08, 2011 3:35 AM GMT
    It does not necesarily follow that because Obama comes from Chicago, he is part of the corruption . . . although one of his close associates was a crook. Chicago (which basically runs Illinois most of the time) has always been corrupt- not unlike the machines in most big american cities. Lots of Illinois governors have winded up in prison. But note, they have been from both parties. Walker was a republican; and Kerner, whom was before the time of most of us, was a democrat. Who goes to prison depends on whether the other party can capture the office of states attorney in Cook County or the US Attorney's office, and have enough time to develop the evidence before the office changes parties.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 08, 2011 3:38 AM GMT
    riddler78 said
    Christian73 saidThis is sillier than your usual postings.

    And there is a simple answer to all of this: Publicly financed elections. Get the money out of politics and all the graft goes away.


    I continually find it amusing how threatened you feel by some of the articles I post. Publicly financed elections would hardly do away with the issues here - though it would give journalists, politicians, unions, churches, and a number of other established institutions greater power. Once again you show how inept the policies you advocate are.


    I'm not threatened at all. "ooh, words on Internet are scary" icon_lol.gif

    What you are promoting is quasi-legal graft of the highest order because you know if benefits those who have the most money to spend. That you try and couch it in a shallow intellectual framework may make it more palatable to some but as arguments do this is one of your more obvious failures.

    I could refer to any number of your previous posts where you, yourself, opine unions giving money to Democrats to prove how shallow and silly your attack posts are.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 08, 2011 3:54 AM GMT
    Underscoring the point.

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-07/blagojevich-ex-illinois-governor-gets-14-years-in-prison.html

    Rod Blagojevich, the former Illinois governor convicted of trying to trade President Barack Obama’s U.S. Senate seat for campaign cash or personal favors, was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

    U.S. District Judge James B. Zagel in Chicago today imposed the punishment on the twice-elected Democrat, concluding a two- day hearing and capping a case that began three years ago and featured two separate trials. Blagojevich, whose voice choked with emotion as he addressed the court for about 20 minutes, was ordered to report to prison Feb. 16.

    “The governor was not marched along this path by his staff. He marched them,” Zagel said before he imposed the sentence.