do straight marriages seem more natural than ours?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:29 PM GMT
    my personal belief is that straight marriages are more natural because the whole of the animal kingdom is proof on this. all animals that have two different sets of genitals [one for male and one for female] bond naturally and procreate.

    same-sex marriages cannot procreate. But this does not mean gays are infertile. If they mate with a woman, they can easily make children [those are that fertile, and the overwhelming vast majority of us are]

    clearly our bodies were designed to penetrate women and make children. The structure of the vagina is designed for the penis to enter in it. The anus of a man was not designed for this purpose. These simple observations show that the natural bond between the male and female genitals is more natural.

    procreation is the biggest proof that straight marriages seem to be the more natural form. Afterall, every species needs to procreate or it would be impossible for people to be born, be they homosexual or heterosexual.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:31 PM GMT
    Your bullshit was blown out of the water years ago by "straight" couples that are infertile.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:31 PM GMT
    paulflexes saidYour bullshit was blown out of the water years ago by "straight" couples that are infertile.


    but the argument is not based on infertility, read the above post again
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:32 PM GMT
    SoroushBabak said
    paulflexes saidYour bullshit was blown out of the water years ago by "straight" couples that are infertile.


    but the argument is not based on infertility, read the above post again
    Maybe YOU should reread your last paragraph:
    SoroushBabak said...
    procreation is the biggest proof that straight marriages seem to be the more natural form. Afterall, every species needs to procreate or it would be impossible for people to be born, be they homosexual or heterosexual.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:34 PM GMT
    yes, and still the argument is not based on infertility

    it is based on procreation

    procreation can only happen when the male and female genitals meet

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:36 PM GMT
    You are so badly confused it´s hard to know where to start. Marriage is not the same as the male rabbit fucking the female rabbit and making baby rabbits.

  • sbwlguy

    Posts: 566

    Dec 13, 2011 6:37 PM GMT
    No. Because I feel natural with another man.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:39 PM GMT
    Lostboy saidYou are so badly confused it´s hard to know where to start. Marriage is not the same as the male rabbit fucking the female rabbit and making baby rabbits.



    because human beings are different to other animals.

    human beings are capable of rationality.

    procreation can happen wihtout marriages. But it can happen only between a woman and a man.

    when the sperm enters the vagina.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:40 PM GMT
    ur thread topics r starting 2 make me think ur a troll. js
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:41 PM GMT
    tailgater_3 saidur thread topics r starting 2 make me think ur a troll. js


    i am not a troll. i want to understand as a lot of good people here show a lot of deep thought. i am impressed by your posts as well.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:44 PM GMT
    This thread fails on so many levels.

    Get this, when you see a straight couple all you see is a man and a women. All I see are two people who love each other. When you look at it like that, then gay marriage really isnt a big deal at all.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:44 PM GMT
    SoroushBabak saidyes, and still the argument is not based on infertility

    it is based on procreation

    procreation can only happen when the male and female genitals meet

    If your post is based on procreation, and if your argument is that marriage is part of procreation, then - according to your own post - the marriage of an infertile couple is not as natural as the marriage of a fertile couple.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:46 PM GMT
    paulflexes said
    SoroushBabak saidyes, and still the argument is not based on infertility

    it is based on procreation

    procreation can only happen when the male and female genitals meet

    If your post is based on procreation, and if your argument is that marriage is part of procreation, then - according to your own post - the marriage of an infertile couple is not as natural as the marriage of a fertile couple.


    no, because the infertility is based on a medical condition

    it is a handicap like anyother handicap
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:48 PM GMT
    tailgater_3 saidur thread topics r starting 2 make me think ur a troll. js


    he´s either a troll or a stupid kid who needs to rethink his epistemology.

    Either way I can´t be bothered with it. The body was not "designed" for anything and if using something against it´s evolutionary use were a reason to reject it as an option then Justin Bieber´s voice box would have to be removed.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:49 PM GMT
    Chainers saidThis thread fails on so many levels.

    Get this, when you see a straight couple all you see is a man and a women. All I see are two people who love each other. When you look at it like that, then gay marriage really isnt a big deal at all.


    how can then gay couples have children? should we ask the straight couples for children, or hope for a situation to arise where we can adopt orphans and raise them ours. They still are not our blood.
    A gay man can go to a woman, and procreate and make a child, and bring the child back to his male partner. But what about the mother?
    can the two gay guys and the mother join up in a triple couple?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:50 PM GMT
    Lostboy said
    tailgater_3 saidur thread topics r starting 2 make me think ur a troll. js


    he´s either a troll or a stupid kid who needs to rethink his epistemology.

    Either way I can´t be bothered with it. The body was not "designed" for anything and if using something against it´s evolutionary use were a reason to reject it as an option then Justin Bieber´s voice box would have to be removed.


    i am not a troll and neither a kid

    you can visit my profile.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:52 PM GMT
    SoroushBabak said
    Lostboy said
    tailgater_3 saidur thread topics r starting 2 make me think ur a troll. js


    he´s either a troll or a stupid kid who needs to rethink his epistemology.

    Either way I can´t be bothered with it. The body was not "designed" for anything and if using something against it´s evolutionary use were a reason to reject it as an option then Justin Bieber´s voice box would have to be removed.


    i am not a troll and neither a kid

    you can visit my profile.


    visited and the conclusion is probably silly kid who needs to rethink his epistemology with secondary likelihood of trolling
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:52 PM GMT
    SoroushBabak said
    paulflexes said
    SoroushBabak saidyes, and still the argument is not based on infertility

    it is based on procreation

    procreation can only happen when the male and female genitals meet

    If your post is based on procreation, and if your argument is that marriage is part of procreation, then - according to your own post - the marriage of an infertile couple is not as natural as the marriage of a fertile couple.


    no, because the infertility is based on a medical condition

    it is a handicap like anyother handicap
    Ignorance of the fact that marriage is about love - not procreation - is a handicap...a handicap that can be fixed through education.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:55 PM GMT
    paulflexes said
    it is a handicap like anyother handicap


    i do not mean to be insultive, but am being objective
    i am not attacking anyone
    the argument is not based on love marriage. its based on procreation. the argument is that it seems that the male genital is designed for the female genetalia. It is not designed for entering another male's anus.

    sorry for being this explicit.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 6:58 PM GMT
    Please offer a coherent account of why the social partnering of two individuals need necessarily be dependant on them co-siring offspring.

    Until then you have not begun to understand your problem.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 7:00 PM GMT
    SoroushBabak said...blah blah blah...
    the argument is not based on love marriage. its based on procreation.
    ...
    Your thread title sings a different song.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 7:00 PM GMT
    wouldn't we ever want children of our own? children from our own blood, who we can love and cherish as fathers.

    we would have to go to a female to make those children, and bring them back to us.

    this is the irony. what would happen to the poor mother?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 7:02 PM GMT
    paulflexes said
    SoroushBabak said...blah blah blah...
    the argument is not based on love marriage. its based on procreation.
    ...
    Your thread title sings a different song.


    by the title i mean, when marriage happens, then one thought that comes to every man's mind. every man. And the thought is about to have children, or at least the joy of children.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 7:04 PM GMT
    SoroushBabak saidwouldn't we ever want children of our own? children from our own blood, who we can love and cherish as fathers.

    we would have to go to a female to make those children, and bring them back to us.

    this is the irony. what would happen to the poor mother?
    I raised a nephew, and currently have a dog. Both can be a pain in the ass sometimes. Both take all my extra time and money. To have my own child would be a fucking nightmare.

    No, not everyone wants children. More to the point, you should check out all the babies born by fathers who flew the coupe the moment they got their bitch pregnant, and married some other ho cause her pussy was finer or some stupid shit like that.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 13, 2011 7:08 PM GMT
    paulflexes said
    No, not everyone wants children. .


    gays are 10% of the male population. i bet most do want children.