Court rules in Georgia case on student's view of 'gays'

  • metta

    Posts: 39159

    Dec 20, 2011 9:30 PM GMT
    Court rules in Georgia case on student's view of 'gays'

    (Warning, the article is from the extreme religious right so the comments get pretty nasty.)

    http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1500378
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 9:49 PM GMT
    +1 for GA icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 10:17 PM GMT
    Good!
  • Matty_ZA_89

    Posts: 17

    Dec 20, 2011 10:28 PM GMT
    Wow I actually can't believe some of those comments. Its actually depressing to see such intolerance exists in the world. Why does someone always have to be right?
  • conservativej...

    Posts: 2465

    Dec 20, 2011 10:40 PM GMT
    Good. The ethics of conduct rules apply to everyone.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 10:53 PM GMT
    Sweet!!!

    For such a conservative/fundamentalist state, GA surprisingly has some rational and intelligent judges. icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 10:57 PM GMT
    Good. And don´t read the comments.. stupid fuck witted evangelicals.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 11:04 PM GMT
    blackhawksfan saidSweet!!!

    For such a conservative/fundamentalist state, GA surprisingly has some rational and intelligent judges. icon_biggrin.gif
    Yeah and I'm sure the recall petitions for them "activist judges" are being printed already.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 11:04 PM GMT
    I agree with the judges.

    Lostboy saidGood. And don´t read the comments.. stupid fuck witted evangelicals.


    Too late, I has a sad now. And a headache.
  • ja89

    Posts: 789

    Dec 20, 2011 11:05 PM GMT
    the comments are crazy...The attorney said why is she to change for what she believes in by attending a gay pride and reflecting upon it? She's trying to change people in the opposite direction based from the barbaric views that the bible is placing on her. "she believed homosexual behavior was morally wrong and that she would then help such clients change that behavior." Now how is her point moral and the judges not? because she's Christian? doesn't work for me people are soo ignorant these days. The people commenting on these are blinded and just outright crazy in my eyes to say we have a corrupt system for having someone, who's supposed to be guidance to a better life, more open to every possible view out there.

    Sorry I get one rant a day and I just used it.
  • tyler_helm

    Posts: 299

    Dec 20, 2011 11:06 PM GMT
    blackhawksfan saidSweet!!!

    For such a conservative/fundamentalist state, GA surprisingly has some rational and intelligent judges. icon_biggrin.gif


    Yeah who knew! Still not moving there
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM GMT
    I tried not to read the comments but I couldnt help it. Some people's views are so vile, and it always makes me questions religion and God. If only people knew better. Unfortunatley for them, we as a community are here to stay.
  • Menergy_1

    Posts: 737

    Dec 20, 2011 11:14 PM GMT
    Yep, I need a shower now for sure.....
    What's the saying? "There's just no talking to these people" Not to mention, they all pretty much missed the central point about certification standards/professional standards required to be granted a degree or license in the field. (face palm)
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 20, 2011 11:51 PM GMT
    Arent these judges the type that NEWT wants arrested?
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19138

    Dec 21, 2011 12:04 AM GMT
    mocktwinkie saidGood!



    Ditto!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:21 AM GMT
    Couldn't stop myself from reading the inane comments. Damn. Not a brain cell between them. My "favorite" is where someone tried to insist that the code of ethics was being broken by this decision to uphold the code of ethics. Because "God's word" is the real code of ethics. Ugh.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:26 AM GMT
    No court has any business hearing this case to begin with.

    At best, it's a case for civil court.

    The student made her views known, as did the university. Leave it at that.

    You guys are funny. You agree with the judges, because they ruled a certain way. If they had ruled in her favor, you'd be spitting nails.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:27 AM GMT
    TropicalMark saidArent these judges the type that NEWT wants arrested?
    Fuck Newt...if your dick is small enough.

    newt02.jpeg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:31 AM GMT
    JackNWNJ saidNo court has any business hearing this case to begin with.

    At best, it's a case for civil court.

    The student made her views known, as did the university. Leave it at that.

    You guys are funny. You agree with the judges, because they ruled a certain way. If they had ruled in her favor, you'd be spitting nails.

    Uh.. this court is an escalation of the 'civil' court. icon_rolleyes.gificon_rolleyes.gificon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:35 AM GMT
    JackNWNJ saidNo court has any business hearing this case to begin with.

    At best, it's a case for civil court.

    The student made her views known, as did the university. Leave it at that.

    You guys are funny. You agree with the judges, because they ruled a certain way. If they had ruled in her favor, you'd be spitting nails.



    discrimination shouldn't be tolerated regardless of ur religious views. Like they said keep it to urself. Basic human rights override freedom of speech.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:36 AM GMT
    paulflexes said
    TropicalMark saidArent these judges the type that NEWT wants arrested?
    Fuck Newt...if your dick is small enough.

    Have you seen that fugly thing they call newt? Yikes.. I wouldn't fuck him with SB's dick!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:41 AM GMT
    TropicalMark said
    paulflexes said
    TropicalMark saidArent these judges the type that NEWT wants arrested?
    Fuck Newt...if your dick is small enough.

    Have you seen that fugly thing they call newt? Yikes.. I wouldn't fuck him with SB's dick!
    I would: and I'd videotape it and post it on xtube. icon_twisted.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:44 AM GMT
    paulflexes said
    TropicalMark said
    paulflexes said
    TropicalMark saidArent these judges the type that NEWT wants arrested?
    Fuck Newt...if your dick is small enough.

    Have you seen that fugly thing they call newt? Yikes.. I wouldn't fuck him with SB's dick!
    I would: and I'd videotape it and post it on xtube. icon_twisted.gif
    LOL.. I wouldn't come within 300 miles of it! yikes!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:50 AM GMT
    charlitos said
    JackNWNJ saidNo court has any business hearing this case to begin with.

    At best, it's a case for civil court.

    The student made her views known, as did the university. Leave it at that.

    You guys are funny. You agree with the judges, because they ruled a certain way. If they had ruled in her favor, you'd be spitting nails.



    discrimination shouldn't be tolerated regardless of ur religious views. Like they said keep it to urself. Basic human rights override freedom of speech.


    That wasn't the argument made by the university (that Keeton was violating anyone's civil rights).

    The accreditation process is also a problem. It results in a top-down state-imposed political point of view.

    You may like this now, but what happens when a court decides to rule on your point of view?

    In the ideal white Liberal world, that would be common - they may as well set up an Inquisition now.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 21, 2011 12:55 AM GMT
    TropicalMark said
    paulflexes said
    TropicalMark said
    paulflexes said
    TropicalMark saidArent these judges the type that NEWT wants arrested?
    Fuck Newt...if your dick is small enough.

    Have you seen that fugly thing they call newt? Yikes.. I wouldn't fuck him with SB's dick!
    I would: and I'd videotape it and post it on xtube. icon_twisted.gif
    LOL.. I wouldn't come within 300 miles of it! yikes!
    Bitch you know you'd be all up in that shit. Hell you'd even offer to hold one of the camcorders. For free! icon_twisted.gif