Are we seeing the real conspiracy in Real Jock?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:20 PM GMT
    For quite some time we have heard of the conspiracy theory that alleges those of us who believe in the free market system were sent to infiltrate Real Jock. Sometimes the best defense is an offense, and we may be seeing the tangible effects of the real conspiracy from a leftist organization to really infiltrate Real Jock and keep its community locked in and in love with the left.

    Consider the evidence.

    There has been recent discussion of Romney, private equity, and Bain. A few of us have included material from sources such as Yale Law School and the New York Times to provide factual information, so YOU CAN MAKE UP YOUR OWN MINDS. But what happens is interesting. A very few Real Jock members are determined to impede this flow of information by generating not factual or reasonable counter-arguments, but deflections, spin, and other nonsense. And the time they spend on Real Jock suggests part of their livelihood comes from income, resulting from their employment by organizations wanting to ensure various communities stay tied to the left.

    Do we have a tag team here, working in close association but not interacting much directly? One member emphasizing his gayness along with his conspiracy accusations to provide cover for himself and his teammate, who generates most of the nonsense?

    Are some of these messages even being paid for by a George Soros organization?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:23 PM GMT
    Not long ago, you claimed the conservaposse claims didn't bother you in the least.
    Apparently they bother you so much you've created a topic trying to get even.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:25 PM GMT
    meninlove said Not long ago, you claimed the conservaposse claims didn't bother you in the least.
    Apparently they bother you so much you've created a topic trying to get even.

    Not bothered at all by those accusations, but seeing all the spin in factual threads does merit examination. As they say "don't ya think?"

    ADDED POINT: You might be confused between my opinion on that term and the accusations. The accusations have never bothered me. In fact, they provided some justification to the humor and mocking. I have stated that I don't use that term, invented by an ex, highly unstable RJ member. Others like the term. I don't use it and don't care much one way or the other.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:29 PM GMT


    Oh golly, you're so transparent you'd make a great window.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19138

    Jan 14, 2012 4:33 PM GMT
    I can only speak for myself, but I have rather grown to like the "Conservaposse" label icon_lol.gif


    conservaposse.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:36 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidI can only speak for myself, but I have rather grown to like the "Conservaposse" label

    No problem at all, an individual choice. But I think discussion of that term got our dear friends up north confused AGAIN as to me being concerned about the conspiracy accusations from what may be the real conspirator. icon_lol.gif
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jan 14, 2012 4:41 PM GMT
    6470_9d4f.gif
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jan 14, 2012 4:42 PM GMT
    tinfoil-hat.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:43 PM GMT
    creature said6470_9d4f.gif



    ROFL!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 4:48 PM GMT
    socalfitness saidDo we have a tag team here, working in close association but not interacting much directly? One member emphasizing his gayness along with his conspiracy accusations to provide cover for himself and his teammate, who generates most of the nonsense?

    Are some of these messages even being paid for by a George Soros organization?

    Why don't you name some of these conspiratorial RJ members? So they can reply to you, and defend themselves?

    And BTW, didn't you RJ right-wingers create your own non-RJ conservative site where you gather? It was announced by you guys right here on RJ. Is that thing still being used?

    What is it you do there? Nobody I know on the Left has such a site. Having your own right-wing site, by invitation-only to discuss gawd-knows-what about us, could sound a bit conspiratorial right there. But I can assure you I do no such thing myself, nor know of anyone here on the Left who does.

    As for Soros, I only wish I could be paid for what I'm already doing online. But I receive no money or compensation from anyone for being here (nor need any being retired), which I believe would be a violation of RJ TOU anyway.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 5:41 PM GMT
    Art_Deco saidWhy don't you name some of these conspiratorial RJ members? So they can reply to you, and defend themselves.

    Ha! Wouldn't you be the first one to complain such a practice was against TOU and if it happened to involve you, run to the Admin again?

    Art_Deco saidAnd BTW, didn't you RJ right-wingers create your own non-RJ conservative site where you gather? It was announced by you guys right here on RJ. Is that thing still being used?

    What is it you do there? Nobody I know on the Left has such a site. Having your own right-wing site, by invitation-only to discuss gawd-knows-what about us, could sound a bit conspiratorial right there. But I can assure you I do no such thing myself, nor know of anyone here on the Left who does.

    How others communicate among themselves is of no concern to you. Whether communication is via another site or via emails is immaterial. Would you care to share or at least describe your email messages, or would that be against TOU?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 6:33 PM GMT
    The sad part of the OP is that despite being on here pretty frequently I have no earthly idea what he's talking about.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 6:37 PM GMT
    Glenn Beck told someone George Soros is funding a conspiracy. Again.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:13 PM GMT
    Wuh?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:23 PM GMT
    meninlove said
    Oh golly, you're so transparent you'd make a great window.

    Oh you sophisticated sleuths, could the transparency be the point, or is that not transparent enough? icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:28 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    Art_Deco saidWhy don't you name some of these conspiratorial RJ members? So they can reply to you, and defend themselves.

    Ha! Wouldn't you be the first one to complain such a practice was against TOU and if it happened to involve you, run to the Admin again?

    Art_Deco saidAnd BTW, didn't you RJ right-wingers create your own non-RJ conservative site where you gather? It was announced by you guys right here on RJ. Is that thing still being used?

    What is it you do there? Nobody I know on the Left has such a site. Having your own right-wing site, by invitation-only to discuss gawd-knows-what about us, could sound a bit conspiratorial right there. But I can assure you I do no such thing myself, nor know of anyone here on the Left who does.

    How others communicate among themselves is of no concern to you. Whether communication is via another site or via emails is immaterial. Would you care to share or at least describe your email messages, or would that be against TOU?

    "Run to Admin again"? What makes you think I ran to Admin? Like when you guys yourselves ran to Admin to have me suspended? And said you were doing so in a thread? And did the same thing to TropicalMark?

    How others communicate is indeed of no concern to me that I would research it. But you guys publicly announced it yourselves here.

    You've claimed vague conspiracy plots by left wingers, that we're the ones who have secret means of communication & coordinating among ourselves. But when you're reminded of your own off-site group you guys formed, suddenly it's "how others communicate among themselves is of no concern to you."

    You should be featured in dictionary entries for the term "double standard." icon_razz.gif
  • musclmed

    Posts: 3287

    Jan 14, 2012 7:29 PM GMT
    socalfitness said.

    Do we have a tag team here, working in close association but not interacting much directly? One member emphasizing his gayness along with his conspiracy accusations to provide cover for himself and his teammate, who generates most of the nonsense?

    Are some of these messages even being paid for by a George Soros organization?


    If it is true George Soros should get his money back.

    In between some of the arguments that quite frankly I have heard all before in Adult conversations amongst friends.

    The difference is these arguments come with personal attacks and guttural slang and vitriol. Which is always convincing, and changes my mindicon_wink.gif

    Actually I hope it continues , its very amusing.

    Not to burst your bubble Socal, but I really think most average readers ignore them.
    It is my opinion the demographic of this website is vastly different than those who subscribe to the aggressive left. And most of the guys know this type of person in real life and "Ignore them".

    I think you give them more credit by linking them to some loosely contrived plan.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:35 PM GMT
    I have absolutely no earthly idea what this thread is about.icon_rolleyes.gificon_rolleyes.gificon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:35 PM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    socalfitness saidDo we have a tag team here, working in close association but not interacting much directly? One member emphasizing his gayness along with his conspiracy accusations to provide cover for himself and his teammate, who generates most of the nonsense?

    Are some of these messages even being paid for by a George Soros organization?

    Why don't you name some of these conspiratorial RJ members? So they can reply to you, and defend themselves?

    And BTW, didn't you RJ right-wingers create your own non-RJ conservative site where you gather? It was announced by you guys right here on RJ. Is that thing still being used?

    Certainly nothing that I know of. Anyway whatever it is, if anything, I'm not there. Maybe I'm just too liberal icon_wink.gif

    What is it you do there? Nobody I know on the Left has such a site. Having your own right-wing site, by invitation-only to discuss gawd-knows-what about us, could sound a bit conspiratorial right there. But I can assure you I do no such thing myself, nor know of anyone here on the Left who does.

    You do have such a site. It's called realjock.com where it runs about 318,000 to 6 or 7.

    As for Soros, I only wish I could be paid for what I'm already doing online. But I receive no money or compensation from anyone for being here (nor need any being retired), which I believe would be a violation of RJ TOU anyway.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:38 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    whatever it is, if anything, I'm not there. Maybe I'm just too liberal icon_wink.gif

    Me either.. i wasn't "invited"..icon_sad.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:41 PM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    socalfitness said
    Art_Deco saidWhy don't you name some of these conspiratorial RJ members? So they can reply to you, and defend themselves.

    Ha! Wouldn't you be the first one to complain such a practice was against TOU and if it happened to involve you, run to the Admin again?

    Art_Deco saidAnd BTW, didn't you RJ right-wingers create your own non-RJ conservative site where you gather? It was announced by you guys right here on RJ. Is that thing still being used?

    What is it you do there? Nobody I know on the Left has such a site. Having your own right-wing site, by invitation-only to discuss gawd-knows-what about us, could sound a bit conspiratorial right there. But I can assure you I do no such thing myself, nor know of anyone here on the Left who does.

    How others communicate among themselves is of no concern to you. Whether communication is via another site or via emails is immaterial. Would you care to share or at least describe your email messages, or would that be against TOU?

    "Run to Admin again"? What makes you think I ran to Admin? Like when you guys yourselves ran to Admin to have me suspended? And said you were doing so in a thread? And did the same thing to TropicalMark?

    How others communicate is indeed of no concern to me that I would research it. But you guys publicly announced it yourselves here.

    You've claimed vague conspiracy plots by left wingers, that we're the ones who have secret means of communication & coordinating among ourselves. But when you're reminded of your own off-site group you guys formed, suddenly it's "how others communicate among themselves is of no concern to you."

    You should be featured in dictionary entries for the term "double standard." icon_razz.gif

    I'm not aware of any attempt to get you suspended, certainly nothing I was part of. What leads you to that idea? I remember a temp suspension, I think from posting info about someone from another site, but I had no role there. I hope you stay because you're much too funny and entertaining, but in ways you clearly don't intend. Could your suspicions be a bit of paranoia, the non-clinical definition, of course?
  • allatonce

    Posts: 904

    Jan 14, 2012 7:43 PM GMT
    Oh internet.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:45 PM GMT
    TropicalMark said
    freedomisntfree said
    whatever it is, if anything, I'm not there. Maybe I'm just too liberal icon_wink.gif

    Me either.. i wasn't "invited"..icon_sad.gif


    And if there isn't one, It's just as well. I simply don't have the time for one more. I'm already on 27 sites regarding my CRE business and a shit load of car hobby related sites and a few gun sites (punny) so I really need to get some sleep sometime.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:52 PM GMT
    socalfitness saidCould your suspicions be a bit of paranoia, the non-clinical definition, of course?

    And your own suspicions, of a secret right-winger network & conspiracy here? icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2012 7:54 PM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    socalfitness saidCould your suspicions be a bit of paranoia, the non-clinical definition, of course?

    And your own suspicions, of a secret right-winger network & conspiracy here? icon_wink.gif
    ZING!