southbeach1500 saidWhat a stupid title / assumption for this topic.
I suppose this is "another proud moment for the 99%" then...
At least it actually happened, unlike the image you keep posting despite it having nothing to do with OWS.
The reason I posted the image wasn't to bring up #Occupy, rather, it was to illustrate behavior of "the 99%" in the same ludicrous terms as the OP has tried to paint "the 1%."
So, instead of commenting on the deplorable behavior of a particular person towards someone to whom it was obviously and horribly undeserved, you post something that happens to have nothing to do with the original argument? By doing so, it actually seems as if you are defending his actions, which, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume was unattended and not your purpose.
Well, you're all confused.
My comment is towards the deplorable association the OP is making with regards to this CEO and "the 1%" - as if such behavior is something "the 1%" are proud of.
I didn't think it was a particularly nuanced comparison I was making but I guess some people need things to be spelled out for them in the plainest possible terms in order to understand things.
So, as usual, when you make a post that is horribly non-tactful and not even making a valid point or argument and have it brought up to you, you, as usual, start spewing vitriol.
If the argument you were trying to make was that you don't think the action is representative of all of those in the 1%, you should've said thusly, as opposed to bringing up a vulgar image and tying it as a representative version of the OWS movement.
Perhaps I gave you too much benefit and should just assume malevolence from your part in the future.