Guys, I think you already understand that you are dealing with someone who, uber alles, is anti-US/West/Israel.
Not pro-democratic, though he likes to conjure that when convenient.
He maintains that Hamas - which seized all power in a violent coup supported by only 20% of Palestinian Arabs and which opposes further elections - is the legitimate government. Despite running the directly elected president out of Gaza. Going as far as to say that Palestinian Arab voters knew they would suspend further elections (he claimed they campaigned as such) and that thus a 43% plurality can forever vote away democracy (that the al Sabah family was once elected in Kuwait, though, is insufficient).
He supports Hizbullah and the non-democratic veto they hold in Lebanon. Despite only getting about 10% of the vote, they were the only militia which renegged on the Taif Agreement (the treaty which ended the bloody Lebanese civil war, with all other militias = political parties - disarming). What does he find appealing about Hizbullah? Surely not its adherence to democratic or liberal principles or their adherence to international law (re the UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon which found it responsible for the suicide bombing which assassinated the Lebanese Prime Minister - just as 30 years ago they assassinated the Lebanese President for daring to contemplate a peace agreement with Israel). So what is it that makes this nutcase embrace Hizbullah as he does Hamas? That they are anti-Israel and that prior to 9/11 were the terrorist group that had murdered the most Americans.
This is the same nutjob who assured us just over a year ago that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt only has 100,000 supporters and would never be elected. Adding that he wouldn't want to live under their rule. A few months later he was gloating that they were likely to win the election.
Indeed, after telling us how peaceful they are, allegedly having abandoned violence decades ago, in support of Assad he raised the alarm that the insurgents were none other than the dreadful Muslim Brotherhood.
A couple weeks later he celebrated their victory in Egypt.
Check that: he wouldn't himself want to live under the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood.
For the cause, though, he'd happily sacrifice 82 million Egyptians to suffer them.
And if you think the above isn't sufficient lunacy, wait till he gets to Iran. That regime he claims is democratic, despite the vetting of candidates. When Ahmadinejad threatens to destroy Israel he gets a woody, but for "damage control" explains that he's not the person in power, but the [unelected!] "Suprreme Leader", an Ayatollah, is. How's that a democracy, again?
Despite the massive demonstrations 3 years ago, propaganda pouncer opined:
Ayatrollah pouncer> Iran is NOT cracking down brutally on its own protesters. Probably because Iran doesn't HAVE protesters in the kind of numbers it would take to mount any serious challenge to the government (this in a country of nearly 80 million people).
He must get all his news from the regime controlled PressTV - you know, the "free" press which reported that there were but "scores" of deaths in Syria when the death toll was already in the thousands....http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/1443151
Sitting away in his mom's basement with nothing to do, this is how he gets his kicks.
Be it New Year's Eve or Valentines day.
A Gollum of sorts, a diseased mind sick on hate.