This is an inquisitive question.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 1:35 AM GMT
    Some guys will only have sexual relations with you once you're 18. I'm just curious as to what stops them from doing anything if you're a day younger, excluding the whole pedo-ness.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 1:38 AM GMT
    The legal age of consent is usually 18, although in my state I think it might be 17. A guy could technically be arrested or sued for having sex with someone under the age of consent even just a day, which is kind of messed up IMO, what's the difference between a 17 year old and 363 days and an 18 year old, not much except a birthday cake.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 1:46 AM GMT
    Statutory Rape ring any bells to you?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 1:48 AM GMT
    Nature959 saidwhat's the difference between a 17 year old and 363 days and an 18 year old, not much except a birthday cake.


    Same difference there is between a white painted curb and half an inch in front where it's painted red.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:01 AM GMT
    Ariodante saidStatutory Rape ring any bells to you?


    If you don't count the whole statutory rape shenanigans. It would not be okay "In the mind" of someone to have sex with a minor, but as soon as that minor is a day older and 18, it's completely okay.

    Seems a little broken.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:02 AM GMT
    Just FYI, I'm aware of of legal issues lol. I'm not oblivious to it at all.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:13 AM GMT
    What exactly is a non-inquisitive question?

    The 18 year old limit is arbitrary, but since there is no way to measure a person's actual maturity, the law has to have some age at which most people are capable of making a sound decision for consent.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:17 AM GMT
    DudeInNOVA saidWhat exactly is a non-inquisitive question?



    Maybe that would be a rhetorical question? lol
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:34 AM GMT
    DudeInNOVA saidWhat exactly is a non-inquisitive question?

    The 18 year old limit is arbitrary, but since there is no way to measure a person's actual maturity, the law has to have some age at which most people are capable of making a sound decision for consent.


    Don't bring law into it! I simply want to know the thought process that goes on in ones mind. It's a question that doesn't really concern law but more so the psyche.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:38 AM GMT
    100px-Hanson_exploitable_fixed.png
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:39 AM GMT
    Nickrolled said
    DudeInNOVA saidWhat exactly is a non-inquisitive question?

    The 18 year old limit is arbitrary, but since there is no way to measure a person's actual maturity, the law has to have some age at which most people are capable of making a sound decision for consent.


    Don't bring law into it! I simply want to know the thought process that goes on in ones mind. It's a question that doesn't really concern law but more so the psyche.

    But the law is the answer. If the law were changed and the age limit changed to 17, then your hypothetical guys would have sex with the same person they wouldnt have sex with when the age limit was 18.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 2:45 AM GMT
    Nickrolled said
    Don't bring law into it!


    Do you live in a country? Any country? Then law is extremely relevant and pertinent. Despite your wish to exclude it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 3:06 AM GMT
    Based from all of your answers, I'm guessing the law and the law only, has great influence over an older man having sexual relations with someone who is 17 years, 366 days old versus someone who is 18 years old.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 3:33 AM GMT
    Nickrolled saidBased from all of your answers, I'm guessing the law and the law only, has great influence over an older man having sexual relations with someone who is 17 years, 366 days old versus someone who is 18 years old.

    It sounds like you're finally catching on. icon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 3:38 AM GMT
    Nickrolled saidBased from all of your answers, I'm guessing the law and the law only, has great influence over an older man having sexual relations with someone who is 17 years, 366 days old versus someone who is 18 years old.


    For people who would date someone that young, then yes, the law is probably the biggest factor in the cut-off age. The laws vary by state/country too. Some laws have been changed to account for the difference in age, not just being 18 years old. In other words, a 19 year old might be able to date a 17 year old because there are only 2 years between them, but a 30 year old couldn't date a 17 year old. For people who don't date guys that young, the law doesn't matter much.

    Someone 17 years and 366 days would be 18 years old. You mean to say someone 17 years and 364 days. Just FYI.
  • InAGay

    Posts: 2

    Feb 22, 2012 3:40 AM GMT
    Nature959 saidThe legal age of consent is usually 18, although in my state I think it might be 17. A guy could technically be arrested or sued for having sex with someone under the age of consent even just a day, which is kind of messed up IMO, what's the difference between a 17 year old and 363 days and an 18 year old, not much except a birthday cake.


    no u retard. legal age of consent its highest is only like 16. legal age of consent in south carolina is 14.


    see none of you "gays" care about love its all buttsex you people disgust me.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 3:47 AM GMT
    Translation:
    OP isn't actually 18 years old, as stated in his profile. icon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 5:01 AM GMT
    This made me lol icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 5:10 AM GMT
    The same difference as your last breath and death.....its there or its not....
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 22, 2012 9:44 PM GMT
    DudeInNOVA said
    Nickrolled said
    Someone 17 years and 366 days would be 18 years old. You mean to say someone 17 years and 364 days. Just FYI.


    No, I meant what I wrote. Someone who recently just turned 18 is technically 17 years, and 365 days older, being very technical.

    But it works the way you stated it too. My question was asking what's the difference between an older man dating someone who is a day older, besides the fact that the law prohibits such acts. So I'd just say it's because the law is a troll.

    @xrichx: And yes Rich, you caught me, I am a 38 year old man posing to be 20 years younger, fuqq.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 23, 2012 2:06 AM GMT
    yourname2000 saidGreat...now aside from quasi-peds on RJ we've got troll pedo-bait.

    Kids like this are one of the many reasons why some of us wouldn't touch a hot guy under 25yo with Santorum's dick. icon_rolleyes.gif


    And why's that? Since when did being interested in the the psyche of the human mind constitute as being a troll? Or pedo bait for that matter.