jprichva said[quote][cite]MikePhil said[/cite]Are you saying you were at church today There is hope for you yet
Now, MikePhil, I go out of my way not to mock your religion.
You, on the other hand, lose no opportunity to mock the non-religious. [/quote]
Jprichva, that is not true.
Swimbikerun, and I have had some email exchanges about my replies to him. Over all the emails have been very friendly, and honestly my reply to the this one, was me just messing with him, and I believe he knows that.
I have mocked those that have mocked me, that is true. I have never mocked anyone who has not mocked me.
If Swim was offended by my comment, then I apologies.
MikePhil saidJprichva, that is not true. Swimbikerun, and I have had some email exchanges about my replies to him. Over all the emails have been very friendly, and honestly my reply to the this one, was me just messing with him, and I believe he knows that. I have mocked those that have mocked me, that is true. I have never mocked anyone who has not mocked me. If Swim was offended by my comment, then I apologies. Mike
jprichva said[quote][cite]MikePhil said[/cite]Jprichva, that is not true. Swimbikerun, and I have had some email exchanges about my replies to him. Over all the emails have been very friendly, and honestly my reply to the this one, was me just messing with him, and I believe he knows that. I have mocked those that have mocked me, that is true. I have never mocked anyone who has not mocked me. If Swim was offended by my comment, then I apologies. Mike
Oh well, I didn't know you two were email pals.
My bad.
Hugs. You know I love ya.[/quote]
You are bad, turn the other cheek and i'll spank that one too.
I'm a Christian and I have issues with the "gay churches". A lot of my friends try to get me to attend their "welcoming congregations". I'm really ok with everyone making their own choices about religion and churches, but from my experience, I'm not a fan of "gay church".
I've been in a few of the advertised "gay churches" in my area; they are adorned with rainbow flags above the altar and every sermon covers a gay political topic. In many instances the Bible is ignored; probably for fear of offending someone.
I'm more interested in a particular congregation's doctrine; what do they believe and teach and are those beliefs and teachings compatible with my own. For me, "Gay" doesn't need to be a characteristic of my worship.
USMmmm said... I'm more interested in a particular congregation's doctrine; what do they believe and teach and are those beliefs and teachings compatible with my own. For me, "Gay" doesn't need to be a characteristic of my worship.
I really admire this, USM. It marks you out as an intelligent person.
USMmmm saidI'm more interested in a particular congregation's doctrine; what do they believe and teach and are those beliefs and teachings compatible with my own. For me, "Gay" doesn't need to be a characteristic of my worship.
Well said USMmmm.
I go to an "Affirming" church here in Detroit and the church is trying very hard to reach out to the straight community so that we're not just a "gay" church.
I felt the same way when I attended some of the other "gay" churches until I found this one. Politics are NEVER talked about from the pulpit. Our pastor's sermons are about practical life application and fellowship.
And to the original poster, I initially thought.. you're an Athiest? Why did you ever go??? But then I read Timberoo's post and... well... yeah, good for you for at least listening for a moment. I hope the folks in that church will give you the same respect if you ever have a chance to talk with them about what you believe.
It's true MikePhil and I are email buds with benefits. He likes to stuff my inbox.
ActiveAndFit I went because they are at the end of the block, only a short walk away from where I live.
I came out as an atheist and then immediately demanded to see the reverend. But seriously, I thought I could stand at least it just a bit so I could get to know people.
I really couldn't stand it. I'd rather hear how we should put our faith in ourselves and other human beings rather than some imaginary being.
The sermon also seemed rather self-serving, as I'm sure all sermons are. Hit you with guilt about being human, out come the tithing baskets.
swimbikerun saidActiveAndFit I went because they are at the end of the block, only a short walk away from where I live.
I came out as an atheist and then immediately demanded to see the reverend. But seriously, I thought I could stand at least it just a bit so I could get to know people.
I really couldn't stand it. I'd rather hear how we should put our faith in ourselves and other human beings rather than some imaginary being.
This is sounding like a joke you know .. "Why did the atheist cross the road? To go to the church on the other side " or even "Why did the atheist cross the road to go to the Church? To get to the other side"
I also don't know why you demanded to see a reverend, couldn't you have just talked it out with God at home? Well now that you did it, don't do it again .. go and err no more!
Have no idea of what kind of church this was, and there are many different flavors. The only "gay" church I would know is the Metropolitan Community Church, and from what I understand they are more high church than a lot of others.
Sermons at my church aren't about guilt, so it can't be every one.
swimbikerun saidThey just moved in down the block from me. I was able to withstand a whole thirty minutes of the sermon before I had to leave.
As a gay man, I see the need for community but as an atheist I've a lot of problems with organized religion.
If and when I decide to go to a Christian church, I usually either to the church my father ministered in, or the Unit.Universalist. But I go for the sense of community and to reassure myself that I'm not alone in that need. As for the spiritual aspect; which is most important to me, I usually keep that to myself. Not one to brag about number of prayers, donations or hours spent volunteering.
But back to the point. When going to a church or temple I usually go with an open mind, knowing that the others there have their hearts and minds set on hearing what has to be said and want to commune in a way they see fit. Then I try to imagine myself as they are, and occassionally I feel even more connected to the others around me, and somehow connected to everything with that. Light a doobie, pass it to the left and call me a hippy, but we're all connected in more ways than one. It feels good to be around others whom agree, as long as they're not demanding blood for sins and cruxify every Adam and Steve within and earshot.
Further note: none of this was meant to insult anyone of criticize anyone's beliefs, no matter how different from my own. I was once an aethiest, wicca, buddhist and born again christian myself... so I've see the light, from different sides of the room. I've got nothing against you.
swimbikerun saidActiveAndFit my demanding to the see the reverend was said as a joke, and the people at the church all laughed. Laughed at me I tell you!
atlnvmasc said[quote][cite]swimbikerun said[/cite]They just moved in down the block from me. I was able to withstand a whole thirty minutes of the sermon before I had to leave.
Did you leave before they started talking about the unicorns? [/quote]
That made me lol. Funny guy. Anyway...
Total respect for checking things out. Personally, I grew up in church and have checked enough to know I'm not interested in orderly, organised, orthopeadic religion. Don't put a splint on my spirit or a cast on my soul. I'm not damaged, but as God meant me to be. Exploring that outside the church has proved much more fulfilling.
I went to a gay friendly Methodist church here for six months (a reconciling congregation, whatever that means). I stopped because Sunday morning was basically just another gay show, and the church was run by the same upper white class gay male clique that runs everything else in town. Not a very welcoming congregation either, I was an outsider.
jprichva said[quote][cite]MikePhil said[/cite]Jprichva, that is not true. Swimbikerun, and I have had some email exchanges about my replies to him. Over all the emails have been very friendly, and honestly my reply to the this one, was me just messing with him, and I believe he knows that. I have mocked those that have mocked me, that is true. I have never mocked anyone who has not mocked me. If Swim was offended by my comment, then I apologies. Mike
I've been to several gay churches, namely, MCC. and the first time i was there, the usher(a guy) came to us wearing bunny slippers, and pink see thru shawl with feather trims. I think he's test how open minded the visitors are. then the sermon is all about self affirming, love, and freedom. I, who believe in God, would obviously like to hear about God. the whole service is in the name of worshiping God, but worshiping men. another time, they invited a famous speaker, who spend all his time talking evolution during service. and how laughable people don't incorporate views of evolution into bible. He got standing ovation, and gay audiences ate it up. But I really miss God in the church.
ebl333 saidI've been to several gay churches, namely, MCC. and the first time i was there, the usher(a guy) came to us wearing bunny slippers, and pink see thru shawl with feather trims. I think he's test how open minded the visitors are. then the sermon is all about self affirming, love, and freedom. I, who believe in God, would obviously like to hear about God. the whole service is in the name of worshiping God, but worshiping men. another time, they invited a famous speaker, who spend all his time talking evolution during service. and how laughable people don't incorporate views of evolution into bible. He got standing ovation, and gay audiences ate it up. But I really miss God in the church.
Oh yeah, I forgot, God isn't all about self-affirmation, love, and freedom... He's doom, gloom, and willful ignorance.
Oh yeah, I forgot, God isn't all about self-affirmation, love, and freedom... He's doom, gloom, and willful ignorance. [/quote]
reading the opposite of what you are saying, seem like you hold god to a higher standard, that he should have certain intrinsic virtue that you deemed quality?
Isn't it interesting, despite people can deny God's existence to nth degree, they still feel God should hold the highest virtue of men. Hence I do believe that many turn away from God because they have not see the good in him, but see bad done in the name of him.
Purely theoretical I assure you. He could be a grumpy old guy with control issues for all I care.
I just find it funny that whenever God approaches something people can genuinely benefit from, it's suddenly a deviation, not really 'God', or worse, blasphemy.
Makes sense though, since God is actually your own idea of what he is. Yours just happened to be a little more... gloomy.
The kind women wear black shawls over, whisper about for fear of being struck by lightning, the kind flagelists grovel over, the kind whose name should never be made fun of or risk beheadings, the kind who kills first born children for the sins of their fathers?
Sedative saidPurely theoretical I assure you. He could be a grumpy old guy with control issues for all I care.
oh you care, just about all the religious topics you leave your marks and air your hate of it. The thing is, you lump all good and bad of religion together, and discount them both. It's not fair, and you wont' want it to be applied on atheism either.
For every atheistic philanthropy (not that i know any), there must be 100 religious inspired ones to match. If all you know about God is a hateful one, for sure atheism has not enlighten you to take your black shawl off.
oh you care, just about all the religious topics you leave your marks and air your hate of it. The thing is, you lump all good and bad of religion together, and discount them both. It's not fair, and you wont' want it to be applied on atheism either.
For every atheistic philanthropy (not that i know any), there must be 100 religious inspired ones to match. If all you know about God is a hateful one, for sure atheism has not enlighten you to take your black shawl off.
All religions are a group delusion as far as I'm concerned.
As far as "atheistic philanthropy" you're mixing an empirical worldview and a humanist goals. There are plenty of humanist philanthropic organizations while atheism tends to focus more on discussions of supernatural beings.
Such "philanthropy" practiced by churches often involves "helping" those who are weak, then subjecting them to believe in a supernatural being whose representatives on earth are just coincidentally those who are doing the "philanthropy". What need would atheists have for taking advantage of people in such a fashion?
Of course I care about religion, doesn't mean I believe in it.
The issue is your little judgement:
ebl333I, who believe in God, would obviously like to hear about God. the whole service is in the name of worshiping God, but worshiping men.
Why? Have you seen your God? What makes you qualified to make the distinction?
Truth is, you don't believe God if it takes any other form than that of the perpetually frowning, strict, and unforgiving father figure who treats women like chattel. Makes sense that the most commonly accepted version of the Judaic/Christian/Islamic God is that one since the Semitic cultures were originally very patriarchal. Such a god could not possibly love an usher with bunny slippers, right?
You are anthropomorphizing your God, limiting him though you still claim his omniscience and omnipotence, and you don't even realize it... how typical.
ebl333 said Hence I do believe that many turn away from God because they have not see the good in him, but see bad done in the name of him.
See, you religious folk can never grasp the OTHER alternative: that people don't believe in God because the whole concept is flatly absurd. And it has nothing to do with the "goodness" or "badness" of the concept.
This is like debating whether the Klingons were really pure evil or maybe there was some good in them.
swimbikerun said As far as "atheistic philanthropy" you're mixing an empirical worldview and a humanist goals. There are plenty of humanist philanthropic organizations while atheism tends to focus more on discussions of supernatural beings.
Such "philanthropy" practiced by churches often involves "helping" those who are weak, then subjecting them to believe in a supernatural being whose representatives on earth are just coincidentally those who are doing the "philanthropy". What need would atheists have for taking advantage of people in such a fashion?
The point is which worldview inspire more goods? 2ndly, though religious work are more noticeable, it's individual believers who does small goods that i'm talking about.
ebl333 said Hence I do believe that many turn away from God because they have not see the good in him, but see bad done in the name of him.
See, you religious folk can never grasp the OTHER alternative: that people don't believe in God because the whole concept is flatly absurd. And it has nothing to do with the "goodness" or "badness" of the concept.
This is like debating whether the Klingons were really pure evil or maybe there was some good in them.
I do grasp OTHER alteernative, hence i use the word "many", not "all". I'm sure some people have been probed by Klingons and would still deny their existance.
We have all read the saying that "MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL" Right !!! Well I've about come to the conclusion that the word "RELIGION" should replace the word "MONEY". Tell you why I think this way, historicly its pretty clear that in just about every major war "RELIGION" was mixed in there somewhere. The hate of some sect, or religious belief system seems always to be part of the war. Religious people to a large degree are the most intolerant people of others life styles, or beliefs if different from their local religion, it just falls under "GROUP THINK", and religion is used for control of the masses. Its usually religious groups who are followers, and tend to fall for superstitions and will more blindly follow the likes of leaders like bush who "CLAIM" to be a follower of "GOD". Those people who think and study things out for themselves don't seem to follow any religious dogma. Religions promote blind "FAITH" as a virtue, when in actuality blind "FAITH" is dangerous for anyone in real life, and it seems the "FAITHFULL" are the ones who will just buy anything their "lEADERS" tell them. So to me organized religion is just another group trying to get more people in their particular club, and they foster their own growth by teaching that "you must believe as we do if you want to go to "HEAVEN"", this will scare the "FAITHFULL" followers into their club. Its all a big hoax, IS IT NOT???????????????????? So really !!! which causes more trouble in the world MONEY or Religion??????????????????????
The point is which worldview inspire more goods? 2ndly, though religious work are more noticeable, it's individual believers who does small goods that i'm talking about.
"More goods" is a completely relativistic term. I don't understand your second point though in both you seem to imply that religion inspires people to kiss god's ass, doing "good" things. Isn't it better to do "good" deeds of your own accord than be a kiss-up to an imaginary being?
The point is which worldview inspire more goods? 2ndly, though religious work are more noticeable, it's individual believers who does small goods that i'm talking about.
"More goods" is a completely relativistic term. I don't understand your second point though in both you seem to imply that religion inspires people to kiss god's ass, doing "good" things. Isn't it better to do "good" deeds of your own accord than be a kiss-up to an imaginary being?
Indeed. "Good" in this case means "I'm doing this because I don;t want God to send me to hell" kind of good. Not "I'm doing this because it's good".
There's a whole lotta difference between those two. One starts wars in the name of good. Can you guess which?
ebl333, try asking "Which worldview inspires more bads" and you'll get the same answer.
Even as an atheist. You have the right to walk into a church.
Even if you are an atheist you have the right to a view on religions. certainly if they involve them self in your country's politics!
We are all born atheists, as we are not born religious. This is learnt behaviour. Normally forced onto children by their parents. Some of these child when they grow don't grow the balls to break away from the bonds of religion for fear of rejection.
Yet religion if they are homosexuals, rejects them.
Right at this time. we Aussies/Australians, have the evil pope down here in Oz, a protestant land, to hold a world youth conference. Pedophiles paradise.
I just hope as a tax payer. None of my taxers will go to finance this, as I am disgusted it is happening in Oz, a protestant country. Yet protestants have always been more tolerant than the micks.
But you have the right to walk into a church. I just hope you did not drink anything!
I am writing a book on this subject at the moment - there is a problem with organised religions as they do not fit the purpose of what they should be trying to do. If you study the history of religions you will find with latest ones like christianity and the Muslim religion - a lot of the messages have been altered, changed and even made up to fit the purpose of those running the church. We question any new messages from God but we accept messages from a over thousands of years ago with no argument, by making it sacred, we cannot question it. this is dangerous. I believe in God but not the one shown in a lot of religions. As we know a lot of the bible not does make sense, the bible is a collection of writings and not always by the orginal people. A lot of the old part of the bible are just stories and should not be believed literally. religion held such power over people for many years and it also gave churches a lot of wealth and control. Where those 2 things are involved there is always corruption.
A good place to start questioning revealed religion is with Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation.
It is a concise, easy read, and not vitriolic. Once you finish that, read his The End of Faith. Sam notes that religion is a subset of dogma, which includes other irrational, authoritarian ideologies like Stalinism, Fascism, etc.
Proceeds from the DVD go to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali Security Trust, a brave ex-Muslim woman whose life has been threatened by the same religionists who killed Theo Van Gogh on an Amsterdam street.
Actually, an even better starting point is Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God" CD. And excerpt of this monologue was first featured on PRI's "This American Life" in 2005, in an episode entitled "Godless America," which may be downloaded for free.
realifedad said We have all read the saying that "MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL" Right !!! Well I've about come to the conclusion that the word "RELIGION" should replace the word "MONEY". Tell you why I think this way, historicly its pretty clear that in just about every major war "RELIGION" was mixed in there somewhere. The hate of some sect, or religious belief system seems always to be part of the war. Religious people to a large degree are the most intolerant people of others life styles, or beliefs if different from their local religion, it just falls under "GROUP THINK", and religion is used for control of the masses. Its usually religious groups who are followers, and tend to fall for superstitions and will more blindly follow the likes of leaders like bush who "CLAIM" to be a follower of "GOD". Those people who think and study things out for themselves don't seem to follow any religious dogma. Religions promote blind "FAITH" as a virtue, when in actuality blind "FAITH" is dangerous for anyone in real life, and it seems the "FAITHFULL" are the ones who will just buy anything their "lEADERS" tell them. So to me organized religion is just another group trying to get more people in their particular club, and they foster their own growth by teaching that "you must believe as we do if you want to go to "HEAVEN"", this will scare the "FAITHFULL" followers into their club. Its all a big hoax, IS IT NOT???????????????????? So really !!! which causes more trouble in the world MONEY or Religion??????????????????????
Realifedad, I like you so don't take offence by this, but I find your post to be ridiculous. This is true for a few, but as a Catholic and believer in God, I find this kind of nonsense insulting. And for the record, I don't think you have to be of any religion to get to Heaven.
To answer your question, Money without question. What do you think Bush's war is about What do you think 9/11 was about If you think those have anything to do with religion, then you are living in cloud cuckoo land. Religion may be used as a tactic to bring people along, but money is the driver. And the drivers have no interest in God or religion.
Pattison saidEven as an atheist. You have the right to walk into a church.
Even if you are an atheist you have the right to a view on religions. certainly if they involve them self in your country's politics!
We are all born atheists, as we are not born religious. This is learnt behaviour. Normally forced onto children by their parents. Some of these child when they grow don't grow the balls to break away from the bonds of religion for fear of rejection.
Yet religion if they are homosexuals, rejects them.
Right at this time. we Aussies/Australians, have the evil pope down here in Oz, a protestant land, to hold a world youth conference. Pedophiles paradise.
I just hope as a tax payer. None of my taxers will go to finance this, as I am disgusted it is happening in Oz, a protestant country. Yet protestants have always been more tolerant than the micks.
But you have the right to walk into a church. I just hope you did not drink anything!
Indeed. "Good" in this case means "I'm doing this because I don;t want God to send me to hell" kind of good. Not "I'm doing this because it's good".
God doesn't send anyone to hell. I don't believe in hell, at least not the way some do. I do good thing because I like to do good things, and want to do good things. I don't do good thing because I'm scared of what may happen it I don't.
God doesn't send anyone to hell. I don't believe in hell, at least not the way some do. I do good thing because I like to do good things, and want to do good things. I don't do good thing because I'm scared of what may happen it I don't.
Mike
Exactly. Which means one thing: The ability to do TRUE goodness is independent from religion. Anyone can be good, no matter what religion or even if he has a religion at all.
So ebl333's argument that religion inspires more erm.. 'goods' is flat out wrong.
Unless he means 'good' in the sense of filthy rich fat old men donating to christian charities because they don't want to go to hell. Which I would not consider 'goodness' at all, more like a 'guilt salve'.
God doesn't send anyone to hell. I don't believe in hell, at least not the way some do. I do good thing because I like to do good things, and want to do good things. I don't do good thing because I'm scared of what may happen it I don't.
Mike
Exactly. Which means one thing: The ability to do TRUE goodness is independent from religion. Anyone can be good, no matter what religion or even if he has a religion at all.
So ebl333's argument that religion inspires more erm.. 'goods' is flat out wrong.
Unless he means 'good' in the sense of filthy rich fat old men donating to christian charities because they don't want to go to hell. Which I would not consider 'goodness' at all, more like a 'guilt salve'.
And you broke RJ! Congrats!
I understand ebl333, and I do think religion can inspire good things, but it's not a requirement.
If filthy rich men are inspired (for what ever reason) to donate to charities (christian or not) then that is in my opinion "good" So long as that money goes were it is needed then it is all good in my opinion.
And thanks, I knew I would do damage here some day
realifedad said We have all read the saying that "MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL" Right !!! Well I've about come to the conclusion that the word "RELIGION" should replace the word "MONEY". Tell you why I think this way, historicly its pretty clear that in just about every major war "RELIGION" was mixed in there somewhere. The hate of some sect, or religious belief system seems always to be part of the war. Religious people to a large degree are the most intolerant people of others life styles, or beliefs if different from their local religion, it just falls under "GROUP THINK", and religion is used for control of the masses. Its usually religious groups who are followers, and tend to fall for superstitions and will more blindly follow the likes of leaders like bush who "CLAIM" to be a follower of "GOD". Those people who think and study things out for themselves don't seem to follow any religious dogma. Religions promote blind "FAITH" as a virtue, when in actuality blind "FAITH" is dangerous for anyone in real life, and it seems the "FAITHFULL" are the ones who will just buy anything their "lEADERS" tell them. So to me organized religion is just another group trying to get more people in their particular club, and they foster their own growth by teaching that "you must believe as we do if you want to go to "HEAVEN"", this will scare the "FAITHFULL" followers into their club. Its all a big hoax, IS IT NOT???????????????????? So really !!! which causes more trouble in the world MONEY or Religion??????????????????????
Realifedad, I like you so don't take offence by this, but I find your post to be ridiculous. This is true for a few, but as a Catholic and believer in God, I find this kind of nonsense insulting. And for the record, I don't think you have to be of any religion to get to Heaven.
To answer your question, Money without question. What do you think Bush's war is about What do you think 9/11 was about If you think those have anything to do with religion, then you are living in cloud cuckoo land. Religion may be used as a tactic to bring people along, but money is the driver. And the drivers have no interest in God or religion.
Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi Mike !!! I like you too, and no way am I offended. But think about this, even bush's war, which you and I would probably agree is about controling OIL, which is "money", so you got me as far as that goes. But !!! What did he use to get the people to back his war? Fear of attack for one, but to a large degree what resonated with the public was that "them muslims want to kill us" because as bush said "they hate our freedoms" and the muslims want us all "to convert or die". so you see, there is the religion in the equation even of this war. There's few conflicts that somehow the leaders or the peoples ignorant superstitions about other peoples religion doesn't get into the mix. You see what I'm getting at? Take all those years of the Catholics and the Protestants there in Ireland, fighting and killing each other. If those fighters had been true to their doctrins of their individual churches the first shot might not have even happened. but there again rivalry over religion has had a lot to do with all that conflict, and all that death. Religions good sometimes I think is way overrated when put side by side with the harm thats come out of it, true its mostly because of individuals (personal and collectively) ignorance that has brought about the harm, but somehow religion fosters following without thinking for yourselves, "FAITH" is the word, sadly it leads to ignorance far too often, that's why I think you see so many southern baptist/evangelicals following the likes of bush. Do you see where I'm coming from?
for one there should be no such thing as a gay church.. church is religious and true, being gay is not, it goes against the bible. there is only one way to be in a church, thats the true teachings of the bible.. there ar eso many people who are goin to hell if they dont change their beliefs
There are a number of theologians who would disagree with you, AtopStud. There is a significant set of resources and studies available which look at issues with the clobber passages which seem to be unattackable until you look at the translations used vs the translation options available. eg http://truthsetsfree.net/bible.htm
Atopstud saidfor one there should be no such thing as a gay church.. church is religious and true, being gay is not, it goes against the bible. there is only one way to be in a church, thats the true teachings of the bible.. there ar eso many people who are goin to hell if they dont change their beliefs
dcarm saidThere are a number of theologians who would disagree with you, AtopStud. There is a significant set of resources and studies available which look at issues with the clobber passages which seem to be unattackable until you look at the translations used vs the translation options available. eg http://truthsetsfree.net/bible.htm
Cheers D
for one who cares about what the theologians believe, the only true way is the bible, i am not one to be a hypocrite cause i am in the wrong and will pray for my own self but if u knew what the bible said we would not be having this conversation...there is no such thing as a gay church. only teaching that come from the bible are church... what u believe my friend is just a bunch of queens gathered together having whats something like a "GATHERING OR MEETING" so its not called church, u might as well have a bunch of girls at an AA meeting eating sticks of celery....
Split a piece of wood and you will find me.... Lift a stone...and I am there.....
Words from Jesus himself. It means that church is anywhere you allow it to be. It's not some building or even the bible for that matter. And it's definitely not a guy who promotes the bible and what God is while simultaneously insulting the attempt made by gay men trying to find their way to something higher by comparing them to people of the opposite sex at an AA meeting eating a negative calorie food like celery.
dcarm saidThere are a number of theologians who would disagree with you, AtopStud. There is a significant set of resources and studies available which look at issues with the clobber passages which seem to be unattackable until you look at the translations used vs the translation options available. eg http://truthsetsfree.net/bible.htm
Cheers D
for one who cares about what the theologians believe, the only true way is the bible, i am not one to be a hypocrite cause i am in the wrong and will pray for my own self but if u knew what the bible said we would not be having this conversation...there is no such thing as a gay church. only teaching that come from the bible are church... what u believe my friend is just a bunch of queens gathered together having whats something like a "GATHERING OR MEETING" so its not called church, u might as well have a bunch of girls at an AA meeting eating sticks of celery....
Since theologians tend to inform how we, the ley people, interpret the bible, and thus the teachings we glean from it, perhaps we should care.
In particular, consider that large portions of the Bible are not directly translated from the original text, (and some of it can't be, since the originals for many portions of the Bible haven't been found) translating translations can result in a significant semantic shift. Moreso when the original author uses words which are not found outside of their own writings. one example is Paul's arsenokoitai. We also have the problem of the English language being insufficient to express some of the subtleties of Ancient Greek and Hebrew.
The truthsetsfree resource I linked to is actually a bible study, by the way.
I'm pretty sure I know what the Bible says, but just to be sure we're looking at the same passages, tell me what you think it says, and tell me where it says it.
I too, struggle with the concept of "The Gay Church" It irks me that there's that kind of segregation in the community. Any community.
Oh, and as for not being called church, I point you to "where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there in their midst" (Matthew 18:20)
for one who cares about what the theologians believe, the only true way is the bible, i am not one to be a hypocrite cause i am in the wrong and will pray for my own self but if u knew what the bible said we would not be having this conversation...there is no such thing as a gay church. only teaching that come from the bible are church... what u believe my friend is just a bunch of queens gathered together having whats something like a "GATHERING OR MEETING" so its not called church, u might as well have a bunch of girls at an AA meeting eating sticks of celery....
There's no such thing as a gay church... well there's also no such thing as a gay man going to heaven, there's no such thing as a nonbeliever going to heaven...
Because the Bible says so.
Can you get any more self-loathing than that? What do you do after having GAY sex or GAY thoughts? Flog yourself and find the nearest confessional ASAP?
See how deeply religion places guilt on people? Well I hope your praying works and you won't get thrown down to the pits of hell like the rest of us then.
Atopstud saidfor one there should be no such thing as a gay church.. church is religious and true, being gay is not, it goes against the bible. there is only one way to be in a church, thats the true teachings of the bible.. there ar eso many people who are goin to hell if they dont change their beliefs
MikePhil saidI willing to bet that Atopstud is just messing with you. He has to be. He couldn't be that messed up............could he
I doubt he's kidding, MikePhil. I had a blind date once with a very attractive guy, serious Catholic, who spent the date telling me we were all going to hell for being gay, and we deserve it, but he couldn't help himself and by the way, did I want to sleep with him?
Atopstud saidfor one there should be no such thing as a gay church.. church is religious and true, being gay is not, it goes against the bible. there is only one way to be in a church, thats the true teachings of the bible.. there ar eso many people who are goin to hell if they dont change their beliefs
There is truth in what you say.
The Bible rejects homosexuals!
The Pope has closed the door to homosexuals becoming priests, even if they make the vale of chastity.
Go to a catholic church, and wear a rainbow vest. Not only will they back you sit at the back of the room, but will also refuse you the sacrament, as it's not for homosexuals.
You can not be a Mormon and a homosexual.
Homosexual Bishops of the Church of England, are creating a divide, and up raw, over their selfish deeds.
A gay chuch is ignoring the truth, and just steeping around it, so it's not a real church at all.
Religion rejects homosexuals! The Bible tells us so. In my view anyone homosexual whom goes th church, or calls themselves a Christan, certainly if they have a lover, is in denial.....
Atopstud saidfor one there should be no such thing as a gay church.. church is religious and true, being gay is not, it goes against the bible. there is only one way to be in a church, thats the true teachings of the bible.. there ar eso many people who are goin to hell if they dont change their beliefs
There is truth in what you say.
The Bible rejects homosexuals!
The Pope has closed the door to homosexuals becoming priests, even if they make the vale of chastity.
Go to a catholic church, and wear a rainbow vest. Not only will they back you sit at the back of the room, but will also refuse you the sacrament, as it's not for homosexuals.
You can not be a Mormon and a homosexual.
Homosexual Bishops of the Church of England, are creating a divide, and up raw, over their selfish deeds.
A gay chuch is ignoring the truth, and just steeping around it, so it's not a real church at all.
Religion rejects homosexuals! The Bible tells us so. In my view anyone homosexual whom goes th church, or calls themselves a Christan, certainly if they have a lover, is in denial.....
Those that stay away from church, because of what some say, and because of what a book, that was written by man, and not God, says, is in denial. Think for yourself pat, and stop letting everyone else run your life for you.
MikePhil saidI willing to bet that Atopstud is just messing with you. He has to be. He couldn't be that messed up............could he
I doubt he's kidding, MikePhil. I had a blind date once with a very attractive guy, serious Catholic, who spent the date telling me we were all going to hell for being gay, and we deserve it, but he couldn't help himself and by the way, did I want to sleep with him?
I said, uhhhhhh, no thanks.
Poor guy. I believe I could change him
My partner was a bit of a mess when I met him (I hope he doesn't mind me talking about him here). When he was young it was mass every day, and twice on Sundays. Always reading the Bible. Anyway, we had many talks about the Bible, and he now does not believe that the bible is the word of God. He thinks for himself now. He was and is a great guy.
Some of the most hatful bitter women I've cared for are catholics, whom went to church every day, and twice on a Sunday, (brainwashing). It's got a lot to do with why One is unable to class catholics as Christians.
Pluse if the catholic Church was the true church of god, it would not of had such a corrupt past, all the wicked greedy, cruel things Popes have been guilty of.
More often than not. Money and power have become before God. So with such a wicked past how can it be a church of God.
Now in the present, that fact that the Catholic Church is guilty of raping the souls of children, and killing their childhood and faith. The pops have done their best too keep this in house, and out of the public eye, and courts.
No way is this a church of god.
The only countries it now has any power, is in 3rd world countries where it helps to spread the AIDES Virus, by say condoms are wrong.
No way is this a church of God!
Yet there is no such thing as a gay church, as god rejects homosexuals. We are an abomination to him.....
Pattison saidSome of the most hatful bitter women I've cared for are catholics, whom went to church every day, and twice on a Sunday. It's got a lot to do with why One is unable to class catholics as Christians.
Pluse if the catholic Church was the true church of god, it would not of had such a corrupt past, all the wicked greedy, cruel things Popes have been guilty of.
More often than not. Money and power have become before God. So with such a wicked past how can it be a church of God.
Now in the present, that fact that the Catholic Church is guilty of raping the souls of children, and killing their childhood and faith. The pops have done their best too keep this in house, and out of the public eye, and courts.
No way is this a church of god.
The only countries it now has any power, is in 3rd world countries where it helps to spread the AIDES Virus, by say condoms are wrong.
No way is this a church of God!
Yet there is no such thing as a gay church, as god rejects homosexuals. We are an abomination to him.....
You are one hate filled man Pat. The Catholic Church did not rape anyone. Men raped children and they were not all Catholics either. I sure men of every religion have raped. And God does not reject homosexuals. Why are you so gullible
I believe that if homosexuality was an abomination, we wouldn't see it exhibited in the rest of the animal kingdom.
That's a good reason to discount Paul's "they gave up the natural for the unnatural" phrase. It *IS* natural.
How exactly did we get to Catholic-bashing, by the way?
Dcarm, the Catholic bashing is really MikePhil bashing. He wants me to attack him. Read what I said about my partner, and then Pat says "Some of the most hatful bitter women I've cared for are catholics, whom went to church every day, and twice on a Sunday" Trying to insult my partner. The thing smart ass Pat does not know, is that my partner is not Catholic.
He'd had a lover who was on that plane that was shot down over Lockerbie, Scotland years ago. The experience drove him off the deep end---he went into a monastery, and after a year they asked him to leave because they thought he was TOO serious. I mean, he kept complaining that the mass wasn't in Latin, and that they wouldn't let him scourge himself (!!).
So he went into investment banking, which is where he was when I met him. He channelled all that energy into Wall Street and did very well financially. But he scared guys away (he told me all this). Well, he scared me away too.
swimbikerun saidYeah it is the MCC. Some of the guilt talk centered on addiction and the idea seems to be to replace the focus of the addiction with god.
This kind of sounds like 12-stepperish. Which is not all that horrible.
I kind of feel like we have something similar to the black community going on. There's the old, tired, traditionally insurgent, worn out way of looking at things that gay churches like MCC sort of push.