Was Obama Buying And Selling Drugs? Going to be an interesting campaign.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 3:09 PM GMT
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/10/eric_bolling_was_obama_buying_and_selling_drugs.html
    Eric Bolling: Was Obama Buying And Selling Drugs?

    Sean Hannity (Reading from Obama's second book): I drank heavily. Used drugs, plural. He's admitted to cocaine use and I don't remember many questions about the specifics of his drug use. Where did he get the drugs? Who did he do drugs with? How'd he get off drugs? How deep did this go? What drugs did he use? Is that fair?

    Eric Bolling: That's more than fair and I think he's actually even admitted to buying or selling drugs as well, which makes it a little bit different.

    ------------------------------

    PACs currently seeking those who provided Obama his drugs and who may have purchased from him. Could be some interesting videos. Are some of his ex-"associates" now serving time? Some interviews might take place in the big house. LOL

    ------------------------------
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/10/dreams-my-father-quotes-require-context/
    • From Dreams from My Father : "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names." (Page 101)

    "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society's stifling constraints. ... But this strategy alone couldn't provide the distance I wanted … After all, there were thousands of so-called campus radicals, most of them white and tenured and happily tolerated. No, it remained necessary to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 3:25 PM GMT
    socalfitness saidThis is not going to be a wimpy McCain campaign.


    Wimpy? I'd like to see Romney call his wife a c**t and get away with it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 4:41 PM GMT
    JPtheBITCH saidHow sad and desperate.

    Sad and desperate? OK to dig up Romney activities in high school, but digging up Obama activities in the university and law school is sad and desperate? Such an obvious double standard. Let's see everything hidden from that part of Obama's history. Why doesn't the media lapdogs pursue that? Anyone with intelligence above a moron can see this.

    That seems to be the game these days. Romney campaign can stay focused on the economy. When Team Obama slings mud, the other side will sling back even harder. This is not going to be a wimpy McCain campaign. Get used to it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 5:46 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    JPtheBITCH saidHow sad and desperate.

    Sad and desperate? OK to dig up Romney activities in high school, but digging up Obama activities in the university and law school is sad and desperate? Such an obvious double standard. Let's see everything hidden from that part of Obama's history. Why doesn't the media lapdogs pursue that? Anyone with intelligence above a moron can see this.

    That seems to be the game these days. Romney campaign can stay focused on the economy. When Team Obama slings mud, the other side will sling back even harder. This is not going to be a wimpy McCain campaign. Get used to it.


    No. It is sad and desperate. Why would anything think Obama sold drugs (except if you're Sean Hannity and think all black people are drug dealers)?

    He's already admitted he smoked pot recreationally and did cocaine a few times (like nearly every other college student of his age). And, guess what? No one cares.

    So now some Brietbart wannabe is going to find someone Obama went to college with who will claim he once bought a joint for him?

    Guess what? No one will care.

    And buying and selling common recreational drugs is not the same thing that brutally assaulting a classmate and walking a blind teacher into a closed door.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 5:53 PM GMT
    The Romney story about what is alleged to have happened in 1965 by a 17 year old is front page of the Washington Post above the fold. Also in the NY Times.

    Contrast this to the media's hesitation to explore Obama's history as a university student. Papers he wrote, drugs he used, drugs he definitely bought, drugs he possibly sold. Also contrast to the media's hesitation to explore Obama connections in Chicago with admitted terrorists, etc.

    Any doubt about the bias of certain media outlets?

    But that's ok. Media is not as important as in the past when there are many outlets to provide fair and balanced pictures.
  • jock_1

    Posts: 1491

    May 11, 2012 5:54 PM GMT
    Christian73 said
    socalfitness said
    JPtheBITCH saidHow sad and desperate.

    Sad and desperate? OK to dig up Romney activities in high school, but digging up Obama activities in the university and law school is sad and desperate? Such an obvious double standard. Let's see everything hidden from that part of Obama's history. Why doesn't the media lapdogs pursue that? Anyone with intelligence above a moron can see this.

    That seems to be the game these days. Romney campaign can stay focused on the economy. When Team Obama slings mud, the other side will sling back even harder. This is not going to be a wimpy McCain campaign. Get used to it.


    No. It is sad and desperate. Why would anything think Obama sold drugs (except if you're Sean Hannity and think all black people are drug dealers)?

    He's already admitted he smoked pot recreationally and did cocaine a few times (like nearly every other college student of his age). And, guess what? No one cares.

    So now some Brietbart wannabe is going to find someone Obama went to college with who will claim he once bought a joint for him?

    Guess what? No one will care.

    And buying and selling common recreational drugs is not the same thing that brutally assaulting a classmate and walking a blind teacher into a closed door.


    Really Christian?? What if the person Obama sold the drugs to went on a binge and took a shotgun and killed kids on the playground or what if they got behind the wheel of a car and plowed into a family in another car?? I think alot of people would have cared. Not only that but if he did do that he should have gone to jail.

    You don't speak for anyone on here to judge if we should care or not
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    May 11, 2012 6:26 PM GMT
    LOL .....


    WOW! The republican contingent goes on a tin foil hat campaign icon_biggrin.gif

    I seem to recall that a certain other President was accused of running drugs out of Central America ..... And all of those accusations seemed to be coming from the right wing media and no where else

    ...................................... JUST LIKE THIS

    I see your birth certification and raise you a cocaine drug dealer ..... icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 6:35 PM GMT
    jock_1 said
    Christian73 said
    socalfitness said
    JPtheBITCH saidHow sad and desperate.

    Sad and desperate? OK to dig up Romney activities in high school, but digging up Obama activities in the university and law school is sad and desperate? Such an obvious double standard. Let's see everything hidden from that part of Obama's history. Why doesn't the media lapdogs pursue that? Anyone with intelligence above a moron can see this.

    That seems to be the game these days. Romney campaign can stay focused on the economy. When Team Obama slings mud, the other side will sling back even harder. This is not going to be a wimpy McCain campaign. Get used to it.


    No. It is sad and desperate. Why would anything think Obama sold drugs (except if you're Sean Hannity and think all black people are drug dealers)?

    He's already admitted he smoked pot recreationally and did cocaine a few times (like nearly every other college student of his age). And, guess what? No one cares.

    So now some Brietbart wannabe is going to find someone Obama went to college with who will claim he once bought a joint for him?

    Guess what? No one will care.

    And buying and selling common recreational drugs is not the same thing that brutally assaulting a classmate and walking a blind teacher into a closed door.


    Really Christian?? What if the person Obama sold the drugs to went on a binge and took a shotgun and killed kids on the playground or what if they got behind the wheel of a car and plowed into a family in another car?? I think alot of people would have cared. Not only that but if he did do that he should have gone to jail.

    You don't speak for anyone on here to judge if we should care or not


    I thought the Republicans believe in personal responsibility.

    How would Obama be responsible for a hypothetical person taking drugs and then deciding to drive and plowing into a family in a car?

    Try to have some consistency in your beliefs.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    May 11, 2012 6:44 PM GMT
    Christian73 said
    And buying and selling common recreational drugs is not the same thing that brutally assaulting a classmate and walking a blind teacher into a closed door.

    Christian73 saidbrutally assaulting a classmate


    REALLY?!?!
    Lemme guess...you were a drama major? icon_rolleyes.gif
    Ohhhh the double-standard around here would be darn right scary if it were not so utterly hilarious. Hmmmm...let's see....High School Prank vs. illegal drug deal?...would be interesting to see how that one plays out. Illicit Drug Dealing vs. Careless Use of a Pair of Scissors??? Oh lordy some of you have really lost all your senses.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 6:57 PM GMT
    just kill both of them and put the American ppl out of our misery already

    jk
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 7:06 PM GMT
    Worse than this, have you seen the Rose Garden lately?

    OPIUM POPPIES everywhere and the Weed is waist high. Poor little Sasha has had to give up her room for Prez-Daddy's meth lab.

    Meanwhile the very upstanding Mitt has this written about him in Forbes magazine today:

    "Romney's behavior in high school was “like Lord of the Flies” and that a number of people from Cranbrook have “really negative memories” of him. "

    The rest of the article by Josh Barro(Gay Conservative who worked for the Romney campaign) is all pretty juicy too.

    The Romney Camp has been desperate to get ANYONE from Cranbrook to come forward to defend Mitt.

    NO TAKERS !

    Isn't that just terrible that ALL of his former classmates have turned on poor Little Willard Scissorhands.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 7:06 PM GMT
    But did he inhale?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 7:17 PM GMT
    JPtheBITCH said
    No, it's called journalistic integrity.
    I'm going to acquaint you with a new concept----new to you and the other Foxbots.
    Journalists are not there to prop up a particular party or a candidate. This is why Fox is not journalism.
    But if there's no story, they don't print one----even if one side has done something worth reporting, they don't just invent crap for the sake of fake 'balance'.
    So your notion that they are partisan because they don't make up some crap about Obama to balance the true things they're reporting about Romney is evidence that you really really don't understand the difference between journalism and propaganda.


    Socalfitness has spent too much time reading Pravda—he started to believe it!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 8:37 PM GMT
    JPtheBITCH said
    socalfitness saidThe Romney story about what is alleged to have happened in 1965 by a 17 year old is front page of the Washington Post above the fold. Also in the NY Times.

    Contrast this to the media's hesitation to explore Obama's history as a university student. Papers he wrote, drugs he used, drugs he definitely bought, drugs he possibly sold. Also contrast to the media's hesitation to explore Obama connections in Chicago with admitted terrorists, etc.

    Any doubt about the bias of certain media outlets?

    But that's ok. Media is not as important as in the past when there are many outlets to provide fair and balanced pictures.

    No, it's called journalistic integrity.
    I'm going to acquaint you with a new concept----new to you and the other Foxbots.
    Journalists are not there to prop up a particular party or a candidate. This is why Fox is not journalism.
    But if there's no story, they don't print one----even if one side has done something worth reporting, they don't just invent crap for the sake of fake 'balance'.
    So your notion that they are partisan because they don't make up some crap about Obama to balance the true things they're reporting about Romney is evidence that you really really don't understand the difference between journalism and propaganda.

    The so called journalists have continually refused to probe Obama's background. He admitted to using drugs, so unless they were gifts, he purchased them from a drug dealer, providing business for a criminal. Maybe he even sold them himself. But they did not hesitate sending teams of so called journalists up to Alaska to probe Sarah Palin's gynecological records. The concept of journalistic integrity is a concept that is completely foreign to you, and you and your ilk are the last ones to even imagine you have a clue what it's about.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 8:55 PM GMT
    TigerTim said
    JPtheBITCH said
    No, it's called journalistic integrity.
    I'm going to acquaint you with a new concept----new to you and the other Foxbots.
    Journalists are not there to prop up a particular party or a candidate. This is why Fox is not journalism.
    But if there's no story, they don't print one----even if one side has done something worth reporting, they don't just invent crap for the sake of fake 'balance'.
    So your notion that they are partisan because they don't make up some crap about Obama to balance the true things they're reporting about Romney is evidence that you really really don't understand the difference between journalism and propaganda.


    Socalfitness has spent too much time reading Pravda—he started to believe it!

    Actually Pravda is an interesting read. They bashed the US a lot. Was a big Putin theme in his staged reelection. So much for the naive Obama reset of relations. But there is another theme in Pravda and the other sources such as the news program Vremya (Time) produced by RIA Novosti News Service (State Controlled). They don't like Romney, so they are in good company with the RJ liberals. They believe they can get whatever concessions they want from Obama, which include unilaterally stopping the missile shield and cutting the US nuclear arsenal, without the Russians having to do anything in return. The open mic gaffe about being "flexible after the election" as much as telegraphed this. The Obama pathetic action is a repeat from 2009. Too bad the US could have likely negotiated some cooperation from Russia on sanctions against Iran and Syria. But the US didn't and the world is a more dangerous place as a result. I'm sure Obama's advisers at State suggested tougher negotiations, but his amateur WH staff, including ex-Communists, must have suggested otherwise. An arrogant and ignorant President knew better than the pros.

    So Pravda, Putin, and the RJ liberals are on the same team here.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 9:05 PM GMT
    Oh, good lord. They're not looking for the dirt because HE DISCLOSED THE DIRT!!!! EVERYONE KNOWS IT!!!! THEY KNEW IT BEFORE THE LAST ELECTION!!!! YES, I KNOW I'M SHOUTING!!!!

    Some of you guys are real pieces of work.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 9:24 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    JPtheBITCH said
    socalfitness saidThe Romney story about what is alleged to have happened in 1965 by a 17 year old is front page of the Washington Post above the fold. Also in the NY Times.

    Contrast this to the media's hesitation to explore Obama's history as a university student. Papers he wrote, drugs he used, drugs he definitely bought, drugs he possibly sold. Also contrast to the media's hesitation to explore Obama connections in Chicago with admitted terrorists, etc.

    Any doubt about the bias of certain media outlets?

    But that's ok. Media is not as important as in the past when there are many outlets to provide fair and balanced pictures.

    No, it's called journalistic integrity.
    I'm going to acquaint you with a new concept----new to you and the other Foxbots.
    Journalists are not there to prop up a particular party or a candidate. This is why Fox is not journalism.
    But if there's no story, they don't print one----even if one side has done something worth reporting, they don't just invent crap for the sake of fake 'balance'.
    So your notion that they are partisan because they don't make up some crap about Obama to balance the true things they're reporting about Romney is evidence that you really really don't understand the difference between journalism and propaganda.

    The so called journalists have continually refused to probe Obama's background. He admitted to using drugs, so unless they were gifts, he purchased them from a drug dealer, providing business for a criminal. Maybe he even sold them himself. But they did not hesitate sending teams of so called journalists up to Alaska to probe Sarah Palin's gynecological records. The concept of journalistic integrity is a concept that is completely foreign to you, and you and your ilk are the last ones to even imagine you have a clue what it's about.


    Socal -

    Faux News and Brietbart have spent endless hours and billions of dollars trying to uncover the darkest secrets of Obama and this is what they've come up with. This is all that you all have come up with... icon_lol.gif
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    May 11, 2012 9:28 PM GMT
    TigerTim said
    Socalfitness has spent too much time reading Pravda—he started to believe it!



    I didn't read the book, but I LOVED the movie... icon_wink.gif

    MV5BMTMyNjk4Njc3NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDky


  • conservativej...

    Posts: 2465

    May 11, 2012 9:42 PM GMT
    Perhaps it was just marijuana residue and cocaine residue in a baggie in OB's book bag?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 9:48 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    TigerTim said
    Socalfitness has spent too much time reading Pravda—he started to believe it!



    I didn't read the book, but I LOVED the movie... icon_wink.gif

    MV5BMTMyNjk4Njc3NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDky




    *loves*
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 9:49 PM GMT
    JPtheBITCH said
    socalfitness said
    So Pravda, Putin, and the RJ liberals are on the same team here.

    There must be a Communist-equivalent of Godwin's law. Call it JP's law:
    When you bring the Soviet Union into an internet discussion, you have automatically lost.

    It was Mr. Tim who bought it up. But I was referring to the Russian Federation. The Soviet Union does not exist anymore. While Obama's economic non-performance will be the major issue, let's not lose sight that you, the RJ liberals, and Putin all desperately hope for the same election results. Patriotic Americans want us to stay strong and negotiate wisely from a position of strength, not weakness and appeasement.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 9:51 PM GMT
    Christian73 saidFaux News and Brietbart have spent endless hours and billions of dollars trying to uncover the darkest secrets of Obama and this is what they've come up with. This is all that you all have come up with... icon_lol.gif

    You ain't seen nothing yet. And to the other guy who said Obama has been completely open about his past, guy must be on something. Why are the transcripts under wraps, just for starters. Let's see his papers too. He admitted using drugs. Where did he get them?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 10:06 PM GMT
    JPtheBITCH said
    socalfitness said
    Christian73 saidFaux News and Brietbart have spent endless hours and billions of dollars trying to uncover the darkest secrets of Obama and this is what they've come up with. This is all that you all have come up with... icon_lol.gif

    You ain't seen nothing yet. And to the other guy who said Obama has been completely open about his past, guy must be on something. Why are the transcripts under wraps, just for starters. Let's see his papers too.

    I'm sure that whatever fakery these people come up with will cause a huge scandale------among the people who were never voting for him in the first place.

    The rest of America will roll its eyes.

    Of course everything negative about Obama will be fake. Romney will keep focus on the economy, but the rest of us will provide the proper exposure that is needed. Will likely have some cumulative effect among the independents. The hardcore left is a lost cause.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 11, 2012 11:23 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    JPtheBITCH said
    socalfitness said
    Christian73 saidFaux News and Brietbart have spent endless hours and billions of dollars trying to uncover the darkest secrets of Obama and this is what they've come up with. This is all that you all have come up with... icon_lol.gif

    You ain't seen nothing yet. And to the other guy who said Obama has been completely open about his past, guy must be on something. Why are the transcripts under wraps, just for starters. Let's see his papers too.

    I'm sure that whatever fakery these people come up with will cause a huge scandale------among the people who were never voting for him in the first place.

    The rest of America will roll its eyes.

    Of course everything negative about Obama will be fake. Romney will keep focus on the economy, but the rest of us will provide the proper exposure that is needed. Will likely have some cumulative effect among the independents. The hardcore left is a lost cause.


    John - What do you think they are going to find that hasn't already been gone over 17,000 times?

    He admitted using recreational drugs (like 70% of all other baby boomers) during his days in college and as a young adult. So someone finds his dealer? Then what?

    The right-wing has tried Jeremiah Wright, the birth certificate, he's a secret Muslim, he "pals around with terrorists, Rezko, etc. and still he won in a landslide and is more popular than Romney.

    The point is this bullshit isn't selling but please continue to waste the right-wing's time and resources on it. It will make the Obama victory that much easier.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 12, 2012 12:11 AM GMT
    Christian73 said
    socalfitness said
    JPtheBITCH said
    socalfitness said
    Christian73 saidFaux News and Brietbart have spent endless hours and billions of dollars trying to uncover the darkest secrets of Obama and this is what they've come up with. This is all that you all have come up with... icon_lol.gif

    You ain't seen nothing yet. And to the other guy who said Obama has been completely open about his past, guy must be on something. Why are the transcripts under wraps, just for starters. Let's see his papers too.

    I'm sure that whatever fakery these people come up with will cause a huge scandale------among the people who were never voting for him in the first place.

    The rest of America will roll its eyes.

    Of course everything negative about Obama will be fake. Romney will keep focus on the economy, but the rest of us will provide the proper exposure that is needed. Will likely have some cumulative effect among the independents. The hardcore left is a lost cause.


    John - What do you think they are going to find that hasn't already been gone over 17,000 times?

    He admitted using recreational drugs (like 70% of all other baby boomers) during his days in college and as a young adult. So someone finds his dealer? Then what?

    The right-wing has tried Jeremiah Wright, the birth certificate, he's a secret Muslim, he "pals around with terrorists, Rezko, etc. and still he won in a landslide and is more popular than Romney.

    The point is this bullshit isn't selling but please continue to waste the right-wing's time and resources on it. It will make the Obama victory that much easier.

    Hasn't been gone through. Been hidden. Point is not to sell to the liberals and socialists here. When people continue to suffer through the economy and read some Obama papers about the glories of Marxism (remember he befriended Marxist professors per his book), maybe they will want to go another direction to improve the country.