May 20, 2012 2:46 PM GMT
The Truth About JP Morgan’s $2 Billion Loss
By Washington's Blog
Global Research, May 16, 2012
Before we can understand what’s really going on with JP Morgan’s loss (which will probably end up being a lot more than $2 billion), we need a little background.
•Is the world’s largest publicly-traded company
•Is the largest bank in the U.S. ... the biggest of the too big to fail banks which are killing the American economy
•Is the largest derivatives dealer in the world (and see this), and derivatives are inherently destabilizing for the economy
•Essentially wrote the faux “reform” legislation for derivatives, which did nothing to decrease risk, and killed any chance of real reform
•Is the creator of credit default swaps – which caused the 2008 financial crisis, and is the asset class which blew up and caused the loss
•Has had large potential exposures to credit default swap losses for years
•Has replaced the chief investment officer who made the risky bets with a trader who worked at Long Term Capital Management ... which committed suicide by making risky bets
•Went completely insolvent in the 1980s
•... and again in 2007 ( and was saved both times by the government at taxpayer expense)
•Heads – with Goldman Sachs – the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which helps set government financial policy
•Has a reputation of being the most risk-averse of the big Wall Street players
•Was kept alive by a huge government bailout ... but used the money to invest in India and other projects which won’t really help Americans
•Has made a killing by kicking companies (and see this) and governments (and here) when they are down, engaging in various types of fraud (update), allegedly manipulating the silver market, and profiting on misery by acting as the largest processor
In addition, JPM’s CEO Jamie Dimon:
•Is a Class A Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is the chief bank regulator for Wall Street (including JPM). Indeed, Dimon served on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York at the same time that his bank received emergency loans from the Fed and was used by the Fed as a clearing bank for the Fed’s emergency lending programs. In 2008, the Fed provided JP Morgan Chase with $29 billion in financing to acquire Bear Stearns. At the time, Dimon persuaded the Fed to provide JP Morgan Chase with an 18-month exemption from risk-based leverage and capital requirements. He also convinced the Fed to take risky mortgage-related assets off of Bear Stearns balance sheet before JP Morgan Chase acquired this troubled investment bank
•Has a reputation of being the “golden boy” and smartest guy on Wall Street
•Has been the chief spokesman and advocate for deregulation of banks, and has lectured, scolded and cajoled everyone who has questioned his banking practices
•Jokes about a new financial crisis happening “every five to seven ye
What Does It Mean?
Pundits and consumers alike are reacting to JP Morgan’s loss like a startled herd of sheep.
They somehow believed that the “best of the breed” bank and CEO – the biggest boy on the block – was immune from losses. Especially since JPM has been so favored by the Feds, and Dimon was so favored that he was being groomed for Secretary of Treasury.
And the fact that the head cheerleader for letting banks police themselves has egg on his face is making a lot of people nervous.
And that the biggest of the too big to fails could conceivably fail.
The government says its launching a criminal probe into JPM’s trades.
Ratings services have downgraded JPM’s credit, and many commentators have noted that other banks may be downgraded as well.
Elizabeth Warren is calling for Dimon to resign from the New York Fed:
iEven CNBC is now calling for Glass-Steagall to be put back in place.
Banking expert Chris Whalen writes:
Someone at the Fed should have at least secondary accountability for the JPM losses if the VaR model/process was faulty. Is there any accountability for incompetent, badly managed federal bank regulators? As our colleague Janet Tavakoli wrote in the Huffington Post: “The U.S. can count on JPMorgan to continue both long and short market manipulation and take its winnings and losses from blind gambles. Shareholders, taxpayers, and consumers will foot the bill for any unpleasant global consequences.”
We think that the loss by JPM is ultimately yet another legacy of the era of “laissez-faire” regulation and even overt Fed advocacy for the use of OTC derivatives by US banks. Fed officials such as Pat Parkinson, who retired as head of the Fed’s division of supervision and regulation in January, were effectively lobbyists for the large banks and their derivatives activities. It seems a little ridiculous for the same Fed officials who caused the problem over the years to now be tasked with investigating JPM, much less regulation of large bank dealings in OTC instruments
Talk about conflicts of interest, why in Hell is Dimon in decision making positions affecting the bank/investment firm he is over? When are we going to learn, conflicts of interest lead to failure.
Is it not time for Glass Stiegal to be reinstated in its entirety ?