Obama has outraised Romney in the Hamptons by 38.6%

  • conservativej...

    Posts: 2465

    Jul 10, 2012 3:42 PM GMT
    A few rich fucks are trying to buy an election. Their money won't get Obama votes but their poor efort to raise cash outside the Liberal Hamptons will allow Romneyto bury them in airtime, and most importantly give Obama an excuse as to why he lost the November 6th election. "It's Bush's fault can be heard now."

    Obama wants to put his foot in mouth and explain away his weaknesses as somene else's fault. Typical minority America.

    _______________________________________________

    You’ll hear plenty this week about Mitt Romney raising money in the Hamptons, and so I thought it was worth putting things in perspective. According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, Romney has reported $119,550 from the 13 zip codes that count as The Hamptons according to Wikipedia. Obama has raised $165,867.

    This data doesn’t include RNC, DNC, or SuperPAC data. It also obviously doesn’t include Romney’s July fundraiser in the Hamptons. It’s up-to-date as of May 31, I believe.

    UPDATE: Sagaponack (11962) was named by Business Week “The most expensive small town in America.” The median home there sells for $4.4 million. That means that half the homes there are worth more. Sagaponack is the orange portion of the bars above. It favored Obama $12,700 to $0.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 3:49 PM GMT
    The Dual National Adelson's money far outweighs all other donors, he has personal intersts on his mind for backing Romney as the the next 9 highest donors, that put together make average american donors to Romney miniscule at best.

    Did you read the article about the ten highest donors ? its right here on the forums. Did you ignore the facts ?
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19137

    Jul 10, 2012 3:58 PM GMT
    realifedad said The Dual National Adelson's money far outweighs all other donors, he has personal intersts on his mind for backing Romney as the the next 9 highest donors, that put together make average american donors to Romney miniscule at best.

    Did you read the article about the ten highest donors ? its right here on the forums. Did you ignore the facts ?



    Should be interesting to see how Mitt Romney's trip to Israel goes coming up.
  • conservativej...

    Posts: 2465

    Jul 10, 2012 4:06 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    realifedad said The Dual National Adelson's money far outweighs all other donors, he has personal intersts on his mind for backing Romney as the the next 9 highest donors, that put together make average american donors to Romney miniscule at best.

    Did you read the article about the ten highest donors ? its right here on the forums. Did you ignore the facts ?



    Should be interesting to see how Mitt Romney's trip to Israel goes coming up.


    I do not expect any issues to arise that is for sure. I think the trip may in fact solidfy many votes moving out of the Democratic column here in Florida. I have long conducted business with many in the Jewish community in Florida and I can assure you most see Obama as a disease that must be cut out.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 4:12 PM GMT
    Just finished reading some of todays Jewish written articles about these topics,

    GUESS WHO IS PAYING FOR ROMNEY'S TRIP TO ISRAEL ?


    ADELSON !!!! IS ANYONE SO BLIND AS TO THINK HE'S DOING THIS FOR YOURS AND MY INTERESTS ??
  • conservativej...

    Posts: 2465

    Jul 10, 2012 4:28 PM GMT
    realifedad said Just finished reading some of todays Jewish written articles about these topics,

    GUESS WHO IS PAYING FOR ROMNEY'S TRIP TO ISRAEL ?


    ADELSON !!!! IS ANYONE SO BLIND AS TO THINK HE'S DOING THIS FOR YOURS AND MY INTERESTS ??


    Have you ever bothered to think some of us my be in cahoots with Adelson and think he is on the correct track?
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 10, 2012 4:59 PM GMT
    Correct track?

    And that track would be what? .... Buying the government?

    Or is there another track that you can make up to cover your ass?
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 10, 2012 10:52 PM GMT
    530625_10150898253811216_704999966_n.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 10:55 PM GMT
    lol how do you sit with all that butthurt?

    you dirty teabaggers do the exact same thing. stfu and stay pressed ♥
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 10, 2012 10:59 PM GMT
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:15 PM GMT
    conservativejock saidA few rich fucks are trying to buy an election. Their money won't get Obama votes but their poor efort to raise cash outside the Liberal Hamptons will allow Romneyto bury them in airtime, and most importantly give Obama an excuse as to why he lost the November 6th election. "It's Bush's fault can be heard now."

    Some of my Russian friends tell me they are getting worried and may funnel money via US entities for Obama. Because of Obama's "flexibility" and his already signal that he wants to unilaterally cut our nuclear stockpile by 80% to give Russia 6,000 to our only a few hundred. The Russians desperately want him reelected because they think of him as "their man in the White House", but the term "man" is a polite translation from what they are saying in Russian. It is said that the actual phrase that I won't translate was actually coined by Putin, which wouldn't be surprising as he is known for some vulgar phrases.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 10, 2012 11:21 PM GMT
    Cutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:23 PM GMT
    conservativejock said
    realifedad said Just finished reading some of todays Jewish written articles about these topics,

    GUESS WHO IS PAYING FOR ROMNEY'S TRIP TO ISRAEL ?


    ADELSON !!!! IS ANYONE SO BLIND AS TO THINK HE'S DOING THIS FOR YOURS AND MY INTERESTS ??


    Have you ever bothered to think some of us my be in cahoots with Adelson and think he is on the correct track?


    After the frantic fanatic RLD posts similar a 1000 times or so, many more of us will be in cahoots with Adelson.

    Go Sheldon!
    Go Bibi!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:23 PM GMT
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.

    Yes and not asking the Russians to do the same is exactly the kind of negotiation they like.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:24 PM GMT
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.


    Gutting is not!
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 10, 2012 11:26 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.

    Yes and not asking the Russians to do the same is exactly the kind of negotiation they like.


    Are you frozen in the Cold War?

    Whether the Russians do the same is none of my concern—I'm not worried about them.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 10, 2012 11:27 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.


    Gutting is not!


    A few hundred is still enough for those who are eager to go to war. How many times over do you need to bomb a place?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:27 PM GMT
    creature said
    freedomisntfree said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.


    Gutting is not!


    A few hundred is still enough for those who are eager to go to war. How many times over do you need to bomb a place?


    as many times as it takes.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 10, 2012 11:28 PM GMT
    JP/Cranky,

    If you're reading this, you were right.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:30 PM GMT
    creature said
    socalfitness said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.

    Yes and not asking the Russians to do the same is exactly the kind of negotiation they like.


    Are you frozen in the Cold War?

    Whether the Russians do the same is none of my concern—I'm not worried about them.

    You are a complete fool. The same unilateral withdrawal of the missile shield treaty in 2009 did not get any concessions from the Russians, such as support with weapon sales to Iran and Syria, or support with other sanctions. Many experts agree it was a missed opportunity by an arrogant and totally naive Pres.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 10, 2012 11:31 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    creature said
    freedomisntfree said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.


    Gutting is not!


    A few hundred is still enough for those who are eager to go to war. How many times over do you need to bomb a place?


    as many times as it takes.


    It took 2 nuclear bombs to end the war with Japan. You really want to make a fuss that we'll only have a couple of hundred nuclear weapons in stock?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:32 PM GMT
    creature said
    socalfitness said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.

    Yes and not asking the Russians to do the same is exactly the kind of negotiation they like.


    Are you frozen in the Cold War?

    Whether the Russians do the same is none of my concern—I'm not worried about them.


    pfft, as its even a question! all these selfish, self-centered babyboomers AKA -the most worthless and ignorant generation - are still stuck in the cold war mindset.

    also, i'm going to have to politely ask socal to change his default pic please. his saggy moobs are making me nauseated icon_sad.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:33 PM GMT
    creature said
    freedomisntfree said
    creature said
    freedomisntfree said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.


    Gutting is not!


    A few hundred is still enough for those who are eager to go to war. How many times over do you need to bomb a place?


    as many times as it takes.


    It took 2 nuclear bombs to end the war with Japan. You really want to make a fuss that we'll only have a couple of hundred nuclear weapons in stock?


    Yes. Same or slightly more than the Russians will be fine.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2012 11:38 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    creature said
    freedomisntfree said
    creature said
    freedomisntfree said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.


    Gutting is not!


    A few hundred is still enough for those who are eager to go to war. How many times over do you need to bomb a place?


    as many times as it takes.


    It took 2 nuclear bombs to end the war with Japan. You really want to make a fuss that we'll only have a couple of hundred nuclear weapons in stock?


    Yes. Same or slightly more than the Russians will be fine.

    They are clueless as to why we would want the Russians to similarly reduce their stockpile.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 10, 2012 11:41 PM GMT
    socalfitness said
    creature said
    socalfitness said
    creature saidCutting our nuclear stockpile is a good thing.

    Yes and not asking the Russians to do the same is exactly the kind of negotiation they like.


    Are you frozen in the Cold War?

    Whether the Russians do the same is none of my concern—I'm not worried about them.

    You are a complete fool. The same unilateral withdrawal of the missile shield treaty in 2009 did not get any concessions from the Russians, such as support with weapon sales to Iran and Syria, or support with other sanctions. Many experts agree it was a missed opportunity by an arrogant and totally naive Pres.


    Remember CuriousJockAZ's words: a kinder, gentler RealJock icon_lol.gif

    I don't care if we didn't get those concessions. My concern is that we're reducing our nuclear weapons.