|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:26 PM GMT
Quote
All right guys, tell us your frustrations with Christianity (or its practitioners) or Practitioners tell us your frustrations with others. Go ahead let it out!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:31 PM GMT
Quote
XRuggerATX saidZedcool saidXRuggerATX saidZedcool saidXRuggerATX said
Feel free. Don't skate. This is a rare opportunity to change the mind of someone who has strong prejudices about conservative Christianity.
Of course a two-word answer here would have been just fine. "Yes" or "No" and then, if yes, the specific judgement rendered.
Why the resistance? I hope it is not because you are afraid of saying something most of us suspected was already true about conservative christianity. That would be kind of cowardly.
Email me instead if you must.
I'll tell you exactly what I think, but I'm unsure of what judgement you want me to render here? If you want me to tell you, I think you're going to burn, that's not a decision for me to make as I have stated in previous posts. That is between you and the good Lord, not between you and I. You have obviously judged me to be wrong/incorrect/ignorant/stupid/retartded/idiotic/mis-informed/crazy in some form already, so, why would my judgement concern you? There are judgements being made on both sides of this argument. I'm just saying respect one anothers' differences of opinion and move on. You are correct in assuming that I believe there is only one way to God and that is through the sacrifice of His Son. Will I disagree with another interpretation. Yes, and I have the right to that opinion, whether you or anyone here thinks otherwise. Does that mean I'm going to MAKE YOU or FORCE YOU to believe it. NO!
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:31 PM GMT
Quote
SED, ZED where are you? cast those stones!! 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:32 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidYes, and I have the right to that opinion, whether you or anyone here thinks otherwise. Does that mean I'm going to MAKE YOU or FORCE YOU to believe it. NO!> WOW, thanks ZED
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:34 PM GMT
Quote
Sedative saidZedcool saidSedative saidZedcool saidGreg0201 saidThis horrible situation begs the question: When can we start discriminating against religious people?
What do you mean start? Religious persecution helped found this country. Rome killed millions of Christians.
ROFL... Christians killed millions more.

[snore] So, that makes it okay and gives you permission to persecute Christians? I won't argue the finer historical points in this thread, but Christians have often had to fight to be allowed to even have their faith, which may possibly be the reasoning for your assertion. There have been just as many periods in history where Christians were in hiding, and most have an overzealous reaction to prevent that from happening again. Off to another thread.
LOL, you brought up Rome in the first place, and now you don't want to hear about it. 
Oh poor Christians. They should obviously be exempt from questioning and corrections and ridicule, since a long time ago, Lions ate Christians (though it will be the other way around now). And also since the US was founded by persecuted religions (which was... may I remind, protestant branches that were persecuted by fellow CHRISTIANS) 
I find that hard to do when the main reason a perfectly good employee (which I'm sure YngHungSFSD is) has been fired is because of the persecution and intolerance that YOUR religion is spreading.
If I can't make fun of your Jesus, why is it okay for your 'infallible' Bible to make fun of 'heathen' religions and gay people?
It's funny what you would consider 'Persecution' when Christianity virtually has a foothold on Global media.
Tolerance does not mean Immunity. "Tolerance does not mean Immunity." Hmmmmm....I'll remember that at the next naked gay pride parade on a public street. Being gay doesn't give you immunity for your actions either. Or the right to abuse those with differing opinions than you own. Otherwise you are no better than crazy lady.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:36 PM GMT
Quote
ActiveAndFit saidZedcool saidYes, and I have the right to that opinion, whether you or anyone here thinks otherwise. Does that mean I'm going to MAKE YOU or FORCE YOU to believe it. NO!> WOW, thanks ZED That seems to be the assertion here about Christianity. Don't hate on me, cause you hate on me and my faith.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:39 PM GMT
Quote
ActiveAndFit saidSED, ZED where are you? cast those stones!! How is that in anyway casting stones? I respect his right to his beliefs, I'm just asking for the same?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:43 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidActiveAndFit saidSED, ZED where are you? cast those stones!!
How is that in anyway casting stones? I respect his right to his beliefs, I'm just asking for the same? It's just figurative .. words = stones (despite what we are told in childhood) .. cast those words!! 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:44 PM GMT
Quote
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:46 PM GMT
Quote
Auryn saidZedcool said
... I think you're going to burn...
You know, aside from everything else you stated this part puzzles me. What does this statement and the fact that you have guys hot listed, which to the casual observer puts you in the same boat as anyone else on this site, what does this statement say about you? Do you believe you're going to hell also?
The unfortunate thing that I see is that your comment and presence here and the fact that the OPs former client/boss joked about homosexuals and homosexuality do not exemplify what I know of the teachings of Jesus and His Apostles. The original question here was what are my judgements on ATX's faith, and I was posing a question to him, not making a moral judgement. I won't say that isn't an internal struggle, but I believe that NO one is exempt from sin, including myself. However, the teachings of Jesus and His Apostles tell us we are forgiven, but not without a cost and consequences. Yeah, big secret on a gay website, I'm attracted to men, but there are Christian men the world over attracted to women in just the same way. Because they are attracted to women does that make them any less of a sinner? No.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 4:51 PM GMT
Quote
Auryn saidYou posted your link and request while I was typing my response. So I reply to your reply here instead of there. To let you know that my reply after the request wasn't intentional.
in otherwords.... My bad. It's OK, I still love you 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:05 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool"Tolerance does not mean Immunity." Hmmmmm....I'll remember that at the next naked gay pride parade on a public street. Being gay doesn't give you immunity for your actions either.
LOL, it doesn't. If I were gay and preached all about the EVIL of heterosexuality, I wouldn't expect to be immune because I'm gay either. Christianity, like most monotheismtic western religions, is implicitly intolerant of anything that do not believe in their dogma. Sure, you may be different because you don't believe in clergy (but you still believe in an infallible Bible...  ), but don't deny that most Christians aren't like you. And if Jesus is divine wouldn't it be definitely VERY shallow of him to be insulted by mere blasphemy? Jesus was only a MESSENGER. I sure wonder if any of you Christians ever got the MESSAGE. Zedcool said
The original question here was what are my judgements on ATX's faith, and I was posing a question to him, not making a moral judgement.
You're wording was ambivalent. I, like Auryn, thought you were saying that Rugger's going to burn in hell for being UU. So I apologize for the misinterpretation. Nevertheless, what is it with Christians and their obsession with sin and evil and guilt?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:09 PM GMT
Quote
OK. now we are cooking ..
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:14 PM GMT
Quote
Sedative said And if Jesus is divine wouldn't it be definitely VERY shallow of him to be insulted by mere blasphemy?
Jesus was only a MESSENGER. I sure wonder if any of you Christians ever got the MESSAGE.
Nevertheless, what is it with Christians and their obsession with sin and evil and guilt?
By definition blasphemy denies His divinity, the only unforgivable sin. Simply, because if you don't believe in His ability to save you or as your Saviour, then how can you be forgiven? He is Holy to me and many other gay men in the world, so, why are we not respected for our faith? If I am told to respect everyone else's beliefs, why are mine not given the same respect regardless of those that misrepresent it. It not an obsession, it is what we believe to be true. Just as there is good in this world, we have many more examples of evil.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:16 PM GMT
Quote
Psalm 141:5 Let a righteous man [a] strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil on my head. My head will not refuse it. Yet my prayer is ever against the deeds of evildoers; (New International Version)New International Version (NIV)Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:23 PM GMT
Quote
ActiveAndFit saidPsalm 141:5 Let a righteous man [a] strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil on my head. My head will not refuse it. Yet my prayer is ever against the deeds of evildoers; (New International Version)New International Version (NIV)Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society Good words. We should hold one another accountable. Just as we should hold boss lady accountable for her actions.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:32 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidGood words. We should hold one another accountable. Just as we should hold boss lady accountable for her actions. Maybe she needs the rod of correction 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:34 PM GMT
Quote
 I expected more debate here .. maybe later tonight Proverbs 26:3-5 (New International Version)New International Version (NIV) Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible SocietyProverbs 26:3-5 3 A whip for the horse, a halter for the donkey, and a rod for the backs of fools! 4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself. 5 Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes. To answer or not to answer .. that is the question
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:41 PM GMT
Quote
All organized religions have had both positive and negative impacts on human society. I am tolerant of religions and religious people as long as they are tolerant of me. But if they try to suppress me or my loved ones, then watch out!
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:48 PM GMT
Quote
ActiveAndFit said I expected more debate here .. maybe later tonight Proverbs 26:3-5 (New International Version)New International Version (NIV) Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society
Proverbs 26:3-5 3 A whip for the horse, a halter for the donkey, and a rod for the backs of fools! 4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself. 5 Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes. Uh huh. And what do you think that means? I wouldn't interpret that to mean we should grab a cain and go to town on her for letting someone go. It means to bring the situation under control. Just as tolerance doesn't mean immunity, neither does forgiveness mean immunity from consequences. If I burn someones house to the ground and in my heart really feel remorse for my actions, should I just be allowed to walk away with no consequence? No, it's great that I am remorseful and maybe the owner has forgiven me, but that doesn't excuse my behavior or the consequences of having to rebuild that persons home.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:49 PM GMT
Quote
SurrealLife> I am tolerant of religions and religious people as long as they are tolerant of me. But if they try to suppress me or my loved ones, then watch out!
Me too. But I still have some stones that accumulated on my desk as I was reading through the other topic, and, well, what am I going to do with them if not throw them...? (:
Zedcool> Rome killed millions of Christians ...I won't argue the finer historical points in this thread
It's probably best that you not argue the historical points at all. For starters, I doubt that there were even "millions of Christians" to be killed prior to Rome adopting Christianity as its official religion.
What also is often misunderstood is that Romans didn't really care if Christians wanted to worship "God" or a Trinity. Ancient polytheists were very open to others worshipping different gods. "God" to them may have been as real as "Jupiter". I do need to study up more about this, but I think what got the early Christians in trouble with the Romans is that they insisted that their gods didn't exist and attempted to convert people to save their souls. Same thing that still gets some Christians in trouble today.
You know, like those Christians who fire someone because he's gay.
Zedcool> Christians have often had to fight to be allowed to even have their faith, which may possibly be the reasoning for your assertion. There have been just as many periods in history where Christians were in hiding, and most have an overzealous reaction to prevent that from happening again.
Ridiculous. For the last 1,700 years Christians have been at the discriminating, not discriminated, end of the spectrum. At worst some Christians were victims of other Christians. Certainly there are exceptions (e.g. early Christians in Rome as discussed above, under communist regimes and in parts of the Muslim world at times), but to pretend there is some group memory of persecution at play amongst Christians anywhere in the West is ahistorical and preposterous.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:52 PM GMT
Quote
Well, I just wish all these fucking right wing, fundy, hypocritical Christians would just go ahead and get "raptured" and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:52 PM GMT
Quote
Well, I just wish all these fucking right wing, fundy, hypocritical Christians would just go ahead and get "raptured" and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 5:59 PM GMT
Quote
caesarea4 saidSurrealLife> I am tolerant of religions and religious people as long as they are tolerant of me. But if they try to suppress me or my loved ones, then watch out!
Me too. But I still have some stones that accumulated on my desk as I was reading through the other topic, and, well, what am I going to do with them if not throw them...? (:
It's probably best that you not argue the historical points at all. For starters, I doubt that there were even "millions of Christians" to be killed prior to Rome adopting Christianity as its official religion.
What also is often misunderstood is that Romans didn't really care if Christians wanted to worship "God" or a Trinity. Ancient polytheists were very open to others worshipping different gods. "God" to them may have been as real as "Jupiter". I do need to study up more about this, but I think what got the early Christians in trouble with the Romans is that they insisted that their gods didn't exist and attempted to convert people to save their souls. Same thing that still gets some Christians in trouble today.
You know, like those Christians who fire someone because he's gay.
Ridiculous. For the last 1,700 years Christians have been at the discriminating, not discriminated, end of the spectrum. At worst some Christians were victims of other Christians. Certainly there are exceptions (e.g. early Rome as discussed above, under communist regimes and in parts of the Muslim world at time), but to pretend there is some group memory of persecution at play amongst Christians anywhere in the West is ahistorical and preposterous. Oh please, of course they did, and whether the Romans actually "pulled the trigger" they were still the ruling government of the time. Almost all of the apostles were put to death for their faith. Even in the western world they were killed for their faith. As you mentioned by other "Christians"; however, none the less they were still persecuted under communism, facism, all the isms, & the monarchies. Persecution is still a very relevant argument.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:00 PM GMT
Quote
I think what kills me, stated in the original thread, was when you said an attack on your Lord was an attack on you, Zed.
To me--a former fundamentalist--the following is a stupid question, but maybe you'll take it seriously: isn't the Lord god enough to deal with these attacks himself? What does he need you for?
Whatever blasphemy is--to you--does the Lord need his adherents to kick ass in his stead for this transgression? I mean, you're taking it personally, but issue A isn't about you (the fundamentalist human-resources witch-hunter) and issue B isn't about you (the Lord has a problem with people who doubt his divinity). When did this become about you?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:00 PM GMT
Quote
I realize that the OP's original post is a branch off of another thread, but I will address the question at hand. I am frustrated by the apparent duplicity and double standards exhibited by many Christians. They often talk the talk (i.e., Christianese) without walking the walk. Love and forgiveness make for great sermon fodder, but those traits seem to evaporate on Monday morning. I grant you that this is a gross generalization, and I do know of individuals who genuinely exhibit the love of God, both in word and in deed.
In terms of all Abrahamic derivatives, you'll find extremist movements within the ranks of each permutation. Those who espouse fundamentalism often grab the headlines, but the rank and file adherents, who lie somewhere behind the headlines, generally provide a more accurate barometer of a faith's purer doctrines and beliefs. The moral of the story: Don't judge a faith or religion by what's presented in the evening news. There are moderate-to-liberal branches of each, but those dear souls, who preach love, tolerance and inclusion, exist somewhere behind the scenes. Seek out those people and your perception may shift toward the positive, if not the neutral.
I do think that Zed has a point, though, when he says:
If I am told to respect everyone else's beliefs, why are mine not given the same respect regardless of those that misrepresent it.
One of my pet peeves with the gay community is just that -- respect my beliefs and my positions, but eff off if you don't agree with me. Gays are, by definition, non-conformists, but they often expect conformity with their non-conformist views.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:06 PM GMT
Quote
Thanks Zedcool. In simple terms, I was asking if you think any less of me (all else equal/unknown) due to my beliefs. It seems you don't. You didn't speak for the others you've observed as sharing your faith (although I asked). But whatever. Feel free if you wish. You already know I'm curious.
So I have/had some prejudices about conservative christians. You have altered my (and maybe others' on here) impression for the better though, and for that, I think you have unique value to your church. I also think that there must be others like you. That's a good thing, because right now you guys are painted, "broad brush", as our enemy. It is somewhat comforting to know that this isn't 100% true.
Not to come off as patronizing, but I hope your can see the value of this exercise and as a result and can appreciate why I kind of pushed it a bit (hopefully not to the detriment of YungHungSFSD's story).
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:15 PM GMT
Quote
mickeytopogigio saidI think what kills me, stated in the original thread, was when you said an attack on your Lord was an attack on you, Zed.
To me--a former fundamentalist--the following is a stupid question, but maybe you'll take it seriously: isn't the Lord god enough to deal with these attacks himself? What does he need you for?
Whatever blasphemy is--to you--does the Lord need his adherents to kick ass in his stead for this transgression? I mean, you're taking it personally, but issue A isn't about you (the fundamentalist human-resources witch-hunter) and issue B isn't about you (the Lord has a problem with people who doubt his divinity). When did this become about you?
Again, my faith in the Lord is part of my character. You are VERY correct in saying that He doesn't need me to defend His good name or me to do anything other than spread the word of His good name; however, the original post singled out a part of her character that I closely identify with, and insults me as a person. It's the same argument, he's fired because he's gay. A lot of guys on here identified with that and was offended. She is or maybe I am an wicked/bad/evil person because she is or I am a Christian? Nuh uh. My first post asked that we leave that part out of it all together. Yeah, she's a bigot and leave it at that. Then everyone jumps on my case because I'm someone in this community that can identify with both sides. So, I proceed to answer/justify my position. JUST LIKE EVERYONE ON A PUBLIC FORUM. Next time I'll ask for permission to express to myself.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:16 PM GMT
Quote
love it, God is great
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:23 PM GMT
Quote
XRuggerATX saidThanks Zedcool. In simple terms, I was asking if you think any less of me (all else equal/unknown) due to my beliefs. It seems you don't. You didn't speak for the others you've observed as sharing your faith (although I asked). But whatever. Feel free if you wish. You already know I'm curious.
So I have/had some prejudices about conservative christians. You have altered my (and maybe others' on here) impression for the better though, and for that, I think you have unique value to your church. I also think that there must be others like you. That's a good thing, because right now you guys are painted, "broad brush", as our enemy. It is somewhat comforting to know that this isn't 100% true.
Not to come off as patronizing, but I hope your can see the value of this exercise and as a result and can appreciate why I kind of pushed it a bit (hopefully not to the detriment of YungHungSFSD's story). No I don't think your patronizing, thanks. I very much appreciated your opinion and your curiousity. As far as my church is concerned they don't see it the way I do, no. They are trying to come to terms with the Lord's message and how to not compromise their faith/belief system, and still achieve the great commission of the Lord to be accepting of others. Lover the sinner and not the sin, sort of thing, and I think that applies to everyone, not just gays. Do they think homosexuality is a sin, frankly yes. Is that a problem for me personally, yes. Does that mean I'm going to turn my back on them or my faith, or especially God, never. I hope that answers your question, and thank you for your understanding and respect. 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:24 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool said
By definition blasphemy denies His divinity, the only unforgivable sin. Simply, because if you don't believe in His ability to save you or as your Saviour, then how can you be forgiven? He is Holy to me and many other gay men in the world, so, why are we not respected for our faith? If I am told to respect everyone else's beliefs, why are mine not given the same respect regardless of those that misrepresent it.
LOL. First of all, let's define Blasphemy. What is blasphemy? irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolableAnd yet, I do not consider Jesus or God or the Bible sacred or inviolable. I am not blaspheming simply because I do not believe in the sacredness of what I am refuting. I do not consider the following Blasphemy:
- An Atheist making a joke about Jesus on a Bike.
- A Buddhist denying the divinity of Jesus Christ
- An Evolutionist ridiculing the story of Creation.
On the other hand I consider the following Blasphemy:
- A priest pointing a finger at you and saying "You are going to Hell!"
- A bunch of satanic cultists performing Black Mass.
- A megalomaniacal televangelist proclaiming that he is the second coming of the Messiah.
Get my point? You shouldn't be insulted because someone makes fun of something he does NOT believe in. In terms of accepting his divinity, hell no. Sure I believe Jesus existed and was a very fine young man indeed in terms of his Philosophy, but the Son of God who is sacred and can not be made fun of? That's stretching it. And by accepting his divinity, do you know that by implication you are also rejecting the divinity of the God(s) of hundreds of other religions? Isn't that insulting to those faiths too? LOL It goes without saying that you are actually stating: "Jesus is God, Buddha is a poseur, Mohammed is delusional, the Dalai Lama is insane"  And you were talking about judgement? Zedcool saidIt not an obsession, it is what we believe to be true. Just as there is good in this world, we have many more examples of evil. LOL. Trust humans to distort the truth. It's like getting a present for Christmas and spending more time admiring the Gift Wrapper than the Contents.  Jesus, Mohammed, Siddharta Gautama (Buddha), Lao Tzu, K'ung Fu Tzu, Abraham, Moses, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Mithra, Zoroaster, etc. (and yes including secular philosophers/leaders/artists) ALL have almost exactly the same message. And yet, it seems like more Christians are more interested in sticking to ritual and the irrelevant stuff (like taking the host on Sundays, or making sure they never say a bad word about God... psh... ridiculous indeed) As the oft quoted Mahatma Gandhi said: " I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ZedcoolIf I burn someones house to the ground and in my heart really feel remorse for my actions, should I just be allowed to walk away with no consequence? No, it's great that I am remorseful and maybe the owner has forgiven me, but that doesn't excuse my behavior or the consequences of having to rebuild that persons home. Oh you'll be surprised. Christians and whatever religions there are (mostly monotheistic ones) have been doing that for centuries. Forget the house. how about burning eccentric young women because they were weird and then walking away without remorse? Auto-da-fé ring a bell for you?  What you call 'forgiveness' is arbitrary judgment given by how your men think your God would react. Which is really really presumptuous of them. I mean, if I was a follower of an omniscient God, I would never pretend to know his thoughts. 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:27 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool said
Oh please, of course they did, and whether the Romans actually "pulled the trigger" they were still the ruling government of the time. Almost all of the apostles were put to death for their faith. Even in the western world they were killed for their faith. As you mentioned by other "Christians"; however, none the less they were still persecuted under communism, facism, all the isms, & the monarchies. Persecution is still a very relevant argument. It's really hilarious when the Oppressor cries foul. LOL Romans did not single out Christians and you fail to see that the -isms were reactionary to the previous crimes of the Christian Church. The Catholic Church has been leading persecution for a VERY long time now. I think you should study your history a bit more obejctively.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:29 PM GMT
Quote
sometimes it is better to tell someone what you honestly think rather than let it stew into hatred ..
Leviticus 19:17 Do not hate your brother in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor frankly so you will not share in his guilt.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:30 PM GMT
Quote
Christian guy here. i think that there are misconceptions about Christians that those who are not should try to understand. We don't say we are perfect people...we are not.
"ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God". That means everyone in the world no matter who they are. Only Jesus was sinless and he was the son of God.
But with the sacrifice of Jesus, God's son, we are redeemed...IF we believe in Him and ask for forgiveness. Now that doesn't mean that we can go out and murder and kill people or do other despicable acts and think we are 'saved' and will go to Heaven. No, we should live a lifestyle that is consistent with Christian values and morals. It isn't easy. That is why we fail...many many times. But we keep trying.
So when people say Christians are hypocrites, they may have a point. Some may be...but a Christian is (if they are really serious about the religion)trying their best to live a life that is moral. And though failures are inevitable, we strive to do better at facing the temptations that life has.
Some people bring up other religions and say 'why is your religion right and not others". Do research. Most other religions follow false gods or man-made concepts. Many will claim they are right but there is only one God. Only one person rose from the dead and was seen by many people (Jesus). Ever wonder why when you read true stories of exorcisms, the demons fear only Jesus and God? Because they know of their existence and fear them.
Several good books that one can buy if interested in delving into theology and differences in different religions. Josh McDowell has a really good one.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:33 PM GMT
Quote
among other things, Zedcool said...spread the word of His good name... Uh oh...I think this is where the trouble starts. Most adults have already built their faith and their values, and to attempt to fundamentally change their paradigm is akin to saying "You've had it wrong all this time. You're lost. Once you get over the shock and overwhelming impact of this revelation and have reduced your existence to a sham, ask me how I can help you." This is where you can really get some angry reactions. It nicks at the vary fabric of one's being. This may sound a bit dramatic, but it's also what it all boils down to. Maybe you are more careful/selective/respectful than that (not careful as in subversive).
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:35 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidXRuggerATX saidThanks Zedcool. In simple terms, I was asking if you think any less of me (all else equal/unknown) due to my beliefs. It seems you don't. You didn't speak for the others you've observed as sharing your faith (although I asked). But whatever. Feel free if you wish. You already know I'm curious.
So I have/had some prejudices about conservative christians. You have altered my (and maybe others' on here) impression for the better though, and for that, I think you have unique value to your church. I also think that there must be others like you. That's a good thing, because right now you guys are painted, "broad brush", as our enemy. It is somewhat comforting to know that this isn't 100% true.
Not to come off as patronizing, but I hope your can see the value of this exercise and as a result and can appreciate why I kind of pushed it a bit (hopefully not to the detriment of YungHungSFSD's story).
No I don't think your patronizing, thanks. I very much appreciated your opinion and your curiousity. As far as my church is concerned they don't see it the way I do, no. They are trying to come to terms with the Lord's message and how to not compromise their faith/belief system, and still achieve the great commission of the Lord to be accepting of others. Lover the sinner and not the sin, sort of thing, and I think that applies to everyone, not just gays. Do they think homosexuality is a sin, frankly yes. Is that a problem for me personally, yes. Does that mean I'm going to turn my back on them or my faith, or especially God, never. I hope that answers your question, and thank you for your understanding and respect.  Heh...chalk one up for the UU "seek to understand" approach then as well. It's rare that I don't get into a drag out fight on these boards. ;-)
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:41 PM GMT
Quote
bocaguyfl said that is moral. And though failures are inevitable, we strive to do better at facing the temptations that life has.
Some people bring up other religions and say 'why is your religion right and not others". Do research. Most other religions follow false gods or man-made concepts. Many will claim they are right but there is only one God. Only one person rose from the dead and was seen by many people (Jesus). Ever wonder why when you read true stories of exorcisms, the demons fear only Jesus and God? Because they know of their existence and fear them.
Several good books that one can buy if interested in delving into theology and differences in different religions. Josh McDowell has a really good one. You didn't answer your own question.  So... why is your religion right? Because, frankly, other religions say the same thing about your religion too.  Did you know that exorcism is not even a Christian invention? Neither is resurrection. Neither is monotheism. And no, I do not need a Christian-biased book on World Religions to know about World Religions thank you. And BTW, the author you just mentioned is a total fake: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/gordon_stein/charade.html
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:54 PM GMT
Quote
Too many with which to respond. I will say, all of that Sedative was to say that you don't respect something that I hold sacred, whether you believe it to be or not, makes it difficult for me to respect your point of view or the things that you do hold sacred. Get it? It's a two way street. One of us needs history lessons but watch out casting those stones. The -isms needed to have control of peoples minds as well as their lives for obedience to the state, not to punish them for their "crimes". The Roman Church was the body that was persecuting other faiths of which I spoke. Dude catch up.
ATX as far as spreading His good name, you can do whatever you want to with that info. I'm commissioned by Him to tell others about His sacrifice, if you don't want to hear it, great I'll move on to someone who does.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:56 PM GMT
Quote
"Only one person rose from the dead and was seen by many people (Jesus)" You realize that that's not what your own holy book says, right? John 11 and 12 recounts the story of Lazarus, who is raised from the dead by Jesus after 4 days in his tomb, in front of a crowd. "Ever wonder why when you read true stories of exorcisms, the demons fear only Jesus and God? Because they know of their existence and fear them." How do you know that these stories are true? Couldn't they have been made up for entertainment value? For the value of religious instruction? Isn't it possible that the authors believed them to be true, but were mistaken -- they were lied to, they imagined things, or there was some sort of rational physical basis for apparent miracle? Fundamentally, bocaguy, you've not given a reason to an unbeliever in Christianity why the Christian stories are true and those of other religions are not. You've said that they're true, and the others ones were not, but you've not explained how you know that.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 6:58 PM GMT
Quote
bocaguyfl saidMost other religions follow false gods or man-made concepts. Many will claim they are right but there is only one God. How can you not recognize that this is deeply insulting to billions of people? Unbelievable.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:02 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool said ATX as far as spreading His good name, you can do whatever you want to with that info. I'm commissioned by Him to tell others about His sacrifice, if you don't want to hear it, great I'll move on to someone who does. Would you be telling me about god for me, for you, or for god? Because if it is for me, I'd be offended, and most certainly would feel judged. (Don't be offended, but I don't capitalize the word god because for me it is not a proper noun. The concept exists for me, but not in that way.)
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:07 PM GMT
Quote
ZedcoolRome killed millions of Christians. Sorry to beat at a dead horse, but I just have to display my dislike for the above quote. - Thousands, not millions. Still a horrendous number, but don't play it up. A better example might have been the persecution of Christians in Madagascar during the reign of Ranavalona in the 1800's. Some estimates place the death toll at over 100,000 from executions during her reign alone. The Diocletianic Persecution (known as the most severe episode of persecution by the Roman Empire), by comparison, accounted for around 3000. - Don't play the sympathy card here. Christianity is responsible for just as much persecution, laying waste to entire religions and peoples (for myself, the destruction of Delphi is one of the most despicable acts in all of history). Of course, Christians do not deserve further persecution (no one does), but don't use past injustice as grounds for further injustice today. All that being said, the original poster (who said "when can we start persecuting religious people", or something) was no doubt making a joke. I can't believe he meant it seriously. Now, as for the question at hand. I can't say I love Christianity, but I can respect it and admire some of its aspects. Without exaggeration, I can say that the most wonderful people I know from back home are all devout Christians. But as with any organized religion, there are many problems. I guess you can say that my issues are with the concept of "organized religion" as a whole, as opposed to Christianity.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:09 PM GMT
Quote
XRuggerATX saidZedcool saidToo many with which to respond. I will say, all of that Sedative was to say that you don't respect something that I hold sacred, whether you believe it to be or not, makes it difficult for me to respect your point of view or the things that you do hold sacred. Get it? It's a two way street. One of us needs history lessons but watch out casting those stones. The -isms needed to have control of peoples minds as well as their lives for obedience to the state, not to punish them for their "crimes". The Roman Church was the body that was persecuting other faiths of which I spoke. Dude catch up.
ATX as far as spreading His good name, you can do whatever you want to with that info. I'm commissioned by Him to tell others about His sacrifice, if you don't want to hear it, great I'll move on to someone who does.
Would you be telling me about god for me, for you, or for god? Because if it is for me, I'd be offended, and most certainly would feel judged. I agree with you ATX that is judging another person.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:10 PM GMT
Quote
XRuggerATX saidZedcool saidToo many with which to respond. I will say, all of that Sedative was to say that you don't respect something that I hold sacred, whether you believe it to be or not, makes it difficult for me to respect your point of view or the things that you do hold sacred. Get it? It's a two way street. One of us needs history lessons but watch out casting those stones. The -isms needed to have control of peoples minds as well as their lives for obedience to the state, not to punish them for their "crimes". The Roman Church was the body that was persecuting other faiths of which I spoke. Dude catch up.
ATX as far as spreading His good name, you can do whatever you want to with that info. I'm commissioned by Him to tell others about His sacrifice, if you don't want to hear it, great I'll move on to someone who does.
Would you be telling me about god for me, for you, or for god? Because if it is for me, I'd be offended, and most certainly would feel judged. I would say for both you and God. I don't get anything out of it (save maybe for a reward in Heaven). I wouldn't be offended that someone told me that a Person loves me and loves me so much that he gave His own life for me? That he suffered and endured terrible pain because of His love for me. If love is offensive then I am definitely in the wrong place. Whether you believed that he did die for you or not, anyone (soldiers, friends, a stranger) that would give their life in my name could not be offensive to me. I guess I am crazy then.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:17 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidToo many with which to respond. I will say, all of that Sedative was to say that you don't respect something that I hold sacred, whether you believe it to be or not, makes it difficult for me to respect your point of view or the things that you do hold sacred. Get it? It's a two way street. One of us needs history lessons but watch out casting those stones. The -isms needed to have control of peoples minds as well as their lives for obedience to the state, not to punish them for their "crimes". The Roman Church was the body that was persecuting other faiths of which I spoke. Dude catch up.
ATX as far as spreading His good name, you can do whatever you want to with that info. I'm commissioned by Him to tell others about His sacrifice, it don't want to hear it, great I'll move on to someone who does. Nuh-uh. Sidestepping!  I answered everything you said, you should at least try to keep up the facade that this is a debate, you know. Just to point out that I am atheist and do not hold anything sacred, anyway. LOL Respecting something means it has to respect me first, and as far as my experience with organized Christianity goes, they never respected me because of my homosexuality. As has what happened per previous thread. Now explain to me about respect again please, when the Pope considers Homosexuality a sin worthy of Hellfire.  Or are you avoiding that question too? Dude, did you just leave out Catholic from the Roman Catholic Church to undermine the fact that it is in fact Christian and did in fact control other people's minds as well as their lives for obedience to the Church? LOL. Why do I get the feeling that you don't even know what the Inquisitions were? Or the Crusades perhaps? Or the way the Holy Roman Empire (which was Catholic, and wasn't even Roman but German, LOL) once controlled most of Europe in what was not surprisingly called the Dark Ages? Its emperor a puppet of the Vatican. And surely you did not take 'crimes' literally (though I wouldn't be surprised if you did LOL). Why do you think Communists banned Religion? Because of what they have seen done in the name of Religion they had concluded that Religion is simply an excuse that will be used by men to exploit other men (which ironically is what their followers did anyway). quoted from the The Communist Manifesto: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
Part I: Bourgeois And Proletarians In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.
Part II: Proletarians and Communists
When the ancient world was in its last throes, the ancient religions were overcome by Christianity. When Christian ideas succumbed in the eighteenth century to rationalist ideas, feudal society fought its death-battle with the then revolutionary bourgeoisie. The ideas of religious liberty and freedom of conscience, merely gave expression to the sway of free competition within the domain of knowledge.
"Undoubtedly," it will be said, "religion, moral, philosophical and juridical ideas have been modified in the course of historical development. But religion morality, philosophy, political science, and law, constantly survived this change."
"There are, besides, eternal truths, such as Freedom, Justice, etc., that are common to all states of society. But communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience."
What does this accusation reduce itself to? The history of all past society has consisted in the development of class antagonisms, antagonisms that assumed different forms at different epochs.
But whatever form they may have taken, one fact is common to all past ages, viz., the exploitation of one part of society by the other. Satisfied why I consider it reactionary?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:20 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidXRuggerATX saidZedcool saidToo many with which to respond. I will say, all of that Sedative was to say that you don't respect something that I hold sacred, whether you believe it to be or not, makes it difficult for me to respect your point of view or the things that you do hold sacred. Get it? It's a two way street. One of us needs history lessons but watch out casting those stones. The -isms needed to have control of peoples minds as well as their lives for obedience to the state, not to punish them for their "crimes". The Roman Church was the body that was persecuting other faiths of which I spoke. Dude catch up.
ATX as far as spreading His good name, you can do whatever you want to with that info. I'm commissioned by Him to tell others about His sacrifice, if you don't want to hear it, great I'll move on to someone who does.
Would you be telling me about god for me, for you, or for god? Because if it is for me, I'd be offended, and most certainly would feel judged.
I would say for both you and God. I don't get anything out of it. I wouldn't be offended that someone told that a Person loves me and loves me so much that he gave His own life for me? That he suffered and endured terrible pain because of His love for me. If love is offensive then I am definitely in the wrong place. Whether you believed that he did die for you or not, anyone (soldiers, friends, a stranger) that would give their life in my name could not be offensive to me. I guess I am crazy then. Well, I may not believe you, just as you may not believe that my pet unicorn thinks you're groovy (work with me here). But if we were to simply leave it at that, then I suppose I'm okay. A gift is about the giver as much as it is about the receiver, so I suppose I could exercise some tolerance here. But I don't *need* it any more than I need a second phone book left at my door. Understand that this is an assessment of my own needs and desires. It cannot be argued (unless I proactively solicit other assessments, in other words, give permission first).
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:24 PM GMT
Quote
Uh Huh of course the communists were world reknown for their benevolence. Spreading wealth among the poor, all of the ruling class lived in the slums. Of course they couldn't being lieing about those altruistic motives or the reason for supressing Christianity. My mistake I thought you at least held yourself in high esteem and sacred. If you don't hold anything sacred, yourself, your friends, your boyfriend, then why would anyone respect for anything at all?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:36 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool said Uh Huh of course the communists were world reknown for their benevolence. Spreading wealth among the poor, all of the ruling class lived in the slums. Of course they couldn't being lieing about those altruistic motives or the reason for supressing Christianity. Oh come on! No one's saying Communism was a great thing. Do you even know what reactionary means? *sigh* Okay to make it simpler, it was an attempt to fight fire (Religion) with fire (Blind Ideology) which lead to them getting doubly burnt.  That doesn't detract anything from the fact that Christianity has been an Oppressor long before the -isms were. Zedcool said My mistake I thought you at least held yourself in high esteem and sacred. If you don't hold anything sacred, yourself, your friends, your boyfriend, then why would anyone respect for anything at all? I consider things valuable, important, dear, precious, cherished, and loved, but I will never consider anything sacred. Sacred denotes untouchability. To be unquestionably correct. I hold a lot of things and principles valuable, but being atheist doesn't make me cold. It sure doesn't make me sheep either. When your religion discourages questioning, that's about the time you should worry about brainwashing... really. When your god doesn't have a sense of humor, you should start wondering how the *BLEEP* does he love everyone in that case?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:42 PM GMT
Quote
Fine He's precious, dear, important, cherished, and LOVED by me. Can't that just be enough to be respected for my position regardless if you think it is brainwashing. If not, then I cannot respect you or your viewpoint. It's that simple and the debate is over.
|
|
Hidden/Deleted Member
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:44 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidBy definition blasphemy denies His divinity, the only unforgivable sin. Simply, because if you don't believe in His ability to save you or as your Saviour, then how can you be forgiven? He is Holy to me and many other gay men in the world, so, why are we not respected for our faith. 1. Religion is superstition and hogwash, but I don't deny anyone the right to indulge in it. 2. What on earth makes you think that belief in this sort of thing requires or deserves respect? It requires only that someone else not prevent you from pursuing it. It doesn't give you the right to demand respect, or to insist that everyone around you shut up about its absurdity.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:45 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidFine He's precious, dear, important, cherished, and LOVED by me. Can't that just be enough to be respected for my position regardless if you think it is brainwashing. If not, then I cannot respect you or your viewpoint. It's that simple and the debate is over. How far would you go for that respect? As far as some of the Muslims did with the Mohammed Cartoons then? *sigh* Okay I realize I'm getting insulting. I'm just sleepy and thus cranky. I'll leave this thread alone for the moment. 
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:47 PM GMT
Quote
jprichva saidZedcool saidBy definition blasphemy denies His divinity, the only unforgivable sin. Simply, because if you don't believe in His ability to save you or as your Saviour, then how can you be forgiven? He is Holy to me and many other gay men in the world, so, why are we not respected for our faith.
1. Religion is superstition and hogwash, but I don't deny anyone the right to indulge in it.
2. What on earth makes you think that belief in this sort of thing requires or deserves respect? It requires only that someone else not prevent you from pursuing it. It doesn't give you the right to demand respect, or to insist that everyone around you shut up about its absurdity. Why should I respect you or your opinion? Your struggle to be equal, or anything about your character? When others tell you to shut-up what you want?
|
|
Hidden/Deleted Member
|
Aug 08, 2008 7:51 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidWhy should I respect you or your opinion? You're struggle to be equal, or anything about your character? When others tell you to shut-up what you want? I don't go about demanding respect, nor whining about not getting any. And I don't particularly care what you think about me. Is that answer enough?
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:01 PM GMT
Quote
jprichva saidZedcool saidWhy should I respect you or your opinion? You're struggle to be equal, or anything about your character? When others tell you to shut-up what you want?
I don't go about demanding respect, nor whining about not getting any. And I don't particularly care what you think about me. Is that answer enough? You may not, but one day you'll need something from someone else, and you'll demand their respect. Let's see how that works out. You've got to give to receive, and it's not looking good. That answer is perfect, so, the next time I see your post, I will gladly ignore it. Your opinion or anything you say means nothing to me.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:03 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidjprichva saidZedcool saidWhy should I respect you or your opinion? You're struggle to be equal, or anything about your character? When others tell you to shut-up what you want?
I don't go about demanding respect, nor whining about not getting any. And I don't particularly care what you think about me. Is that answer enough?
You may not, but one day you'll need something from someone else, and you'll demand their respect. Let's see how that works out. You've got to give to receive, and it's not looking good.
That answer is perfect, so, the next time I see your post, I will gladly ignore it. Your opinion means nothing to me.
What has Christianity given to us Gay men then that it demands respect? Aside from vague promises of eternal torment and being forced into priesthood of course.
|
|
Hidden/Deleted Member
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:04 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool said That answer is perfect, so, the next time I see your post, I will gladly ignore it. Your opinion or anything you say means nothing to me. I'm just going to have to live with your decision. It'll be a struggle, but I think I can manage.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:08 PM GMT
Quote
Anyway, to answer the question of the original post:
There is quite a lot to love about christianity. I love most of christianity. The part I hate is the part where it is used to play on people's insecurities in order to gain power over them. But many big concepts have this problem, not just christianity.
And then there's the ugly taint of the corporate media, which hides too much and magnifies too much else.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:13 PM GMT
Quote
Its interesting to see all these feelings come out .. in the long run it can lead to understanding .. er ,, well sometimes .. (another thread about being misunderstood http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/255170)
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:14 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool saidYeah, she's a bigot and leave it at that. Then everyone jumps on my case because I'm someone in this community that can identify with both sides. As can I. However, I doubt the witch-hunter would believe that her opinion is bigoted, and she would take exception to you saying that her faith in the Lord WASN'T a factor in her firing. I have no doubt it IS her faith that is the issue, for which Souix Falls was fired. Were it not for her faith, she wouldn't have this issue. This is why the discussion of her faith is relevant to the discussion. The firing based upon the beliefs she espouses is certainly grounds for criticism. So, you were not attacked. Your Lord was not attacked. Your definition of your Lord and his scripture is different from hers. But her definition of the Lord and his scripture is fair and open game.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:15 PM GMT
Quote
Oh Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz ? My friends all drive Porsches, I must make amends. Worked hard all my lifetime, no help from my friends, So Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz ?
Oh Lord, won’t you buy me a color TV ? Dialing For Dollars is trying to find me. I wait for delivery each day until three, So oh Lord, won’t you buy me a color TV ?
Oh Lord, won’t you buy me a night on the town ? I’m counting on you, Lord, please don’t let me down. Prove that you love me and buy the next round, Oh Lord, won’t you buy me a night on the town ?
Everybody! Oh Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz ? My friends all drive Porsches, I must make amends, Worked hard all my lifetime, no help from my friends, So oh Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz ?
That’s it!
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:36 PM GMT
Quote
Zedcool, I'm having a hard time taking your devoutness seriously considering that your only piture is of you, shirtless, on a gay self-glorification site.
Would Jesus make comments like, "I'm going with eyes first, but I likes a hairy chest and nice nipples." (In response to the thread "Which part of a guy really turns you on?") or have a hot list of half naked men?
Revelation chapter 3:15-16. "I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm-neither hot nor cold-I am about to spit you out of my mouth."
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 8:59 PM GMT
Quote
wow, people are really speaking their minds.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 9:12 PM GMT
Quote
Chistianity is good, overwhelmingly so. Jesus set the gold standard for the gold standard of how people should act towards one another.
That being said, the Christian Church as an institution is a corrupt, evil, self-serving plague that should be purged from the earth. It has nothing to do with teaching virtue and everything to do with the root of all evil; money.
I have read the Bible for myself and will continue to believe. Unfortunately, I cannot extend that priveledge to an institution that has sanctioned an almost continuous stream of violence and persecution since it emerged.
The wine and wafer h'ors d'oeuvres are a nice touch though.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 9:22 PM GMT
Quote
Nautical saidlove it, God is great Sorry but god not great, god is an allusion, and how religion poisons everything. I'm OK with someone wanting too be a christian. But they feel a need to force their choice on others. You don't find atheist having a need to convert. But One can already hear the cries of protests, by the Christians, if atheists held a convention. yet Christain want to rule our politics, and our lives, and want more rights, and not equal rights for their lifestyle choice.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 9:29 PM GMT
Quote
pdxpally saidZedcool, I'm having a hard time taking your devoutness seriously considering that your only piture is of you, shirtless, on a gay self-glorification site.
"I'm going with eyes first, but I likes a hairy chest and nice nipples." (In response to the thread "Which part of a guy really turns you on?") or have a hot list of half naked men?
Revelation chapter 3:15-16. "I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm-neither hot nor cold-I am about to spit you out of my mouth."
Now who's making moral judgements? Interesting, so because I'm truthful in my likes/dislikes, that makes me less of a Christian or less devout? Better to keep it all inside? Hey, I like men. You bet. A lot of Christian guys like big boobs and a nice rear. So, does that make them more holy? Because I'm a Christian doesn't make me dead, I have flesh and blood just like everyone else, that I have to struggle with, it's not anyone else's battle. I just believe in something greater than myself. I admit it, I am totally flawed, but no one here is any better or worse than me. EDIT: To answer what would Jesus say? I seriously doubt he would, no. But would I? hmmmm.....
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 9:34 PM GMT
Quote
Pattison said
I'm OK with someone wanting too be a christian. But they feel a need to force their choice on others. You don't find atheist having a need to convert.
But One can already hear the cries of protests, by the Christians, if atheists held a convention. yet Christain want to rule our politics, and our lives, and want more rights, and not equal rights for their lifestyle choice. I would pick nits with you on this one. Athiests often express their disdain for people who believe in anything. Terms like "great spaghetti monster in the sky" are not uncommon. Maybe they do not congregate because of disparate reasons for their Atheism, but they are quick to point out the fallacies and illogic of religion. Maybe the strictly rational approach to conversion is not as elegant as an emotional appeal, but it is an attempt at conversion nonetheless.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 9:39 PM GMT
Quote
JustJohn saidTerms like "great spaghetti monster in the sky" are not uncommon. The Flying Spaghetti Monster started to counter the ridiculous debate over Intelligent Design being taught in science classes. It put ID folks into a corner, forcing them to admit that the designer in question was the Judeo-Christian god. But, like so many Christians, followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster have lost site of their gods word and purpose.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 9:40 PM GMT
Quote
I am an out and proud liberal athiest.
This debate will never end because people will always fight/kill/argue over their religion and feel persecuted for their beliefs.
I cannot understand a person's unwillingness to use logic and reason in developing an understanding of the universe, but I defend his or her right not to do so. However, that person's belief in nonsense (non sense) has no place in my life or in secular government.
|
|
|
Aug 08, 2008 11:59 PM GMT
Quote
I love the idea of a compassionate God and that there is meaning in the universe. I also deeply want to be a more spiritual person.
So why are God's followers, almost without exception, a gang of ignorant, self-righteous, murdering, f@#king lunatics?
|
|
|
Aug 09, 2008 12:02 AM GMT
Quote
Well all can say to you homosexual Christians. if you want to enter my temple. You better get down on your knees and start praying.
And god will tell you: then you will rot in hell.
|
|
|
Aug 09, 2008 12:30 AM GMT
Quote
Pattison saidWell all can say to you homosexual Christians. if you want to enter my temple. You have a temple? 
|
|
|
Aug 09, 2008 12:32 AM GMT
Quote
Why love it or hate it? How about simply doesn't concern me, don't stalk and try and preach to me and you can worship a bunch of bananas for all I care 
|
|
|
Aug 09, 2008 12:45 AM GMT
Quote
AMT87 saidHow about simply doesn't concern me, don't stalk and try and preach to me and you can worship a bunch of bananas for all I care  uh, Well ... you did post here even though it doesn't concern you.  Its OK though. This is here for people to vent primarily. You are not being hounded by banana worshipers are you? They can be very dangerous .. http://profbw.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/class-action-against-chiquita/article aboveFour months ago, I posted about the $25 Million jud |