Mittens and those stubborn facts

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 2:39 PM GMT
    Mitt Rmoney'$ battle with "those stubborn facts"

    While it's still unclear how Mitt Romney can be the CEO, chairman, president and sole shareholder of Bain Capital, a company that he claims no responsibility for, it's become increasingly evident that candidate Romney simply doesn't want to talk about the facts of his business record.

    In an interview with CNN's Piers Morgan, Romney suggested that to question his experiences is to "attack success." If this is the case, and if we're also not supposed to talk above a whisper about Mitt's record as governor, including his signature accomplishment in health care reform, then which parts of his biography remain on the table?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 3:33 PM GMT
    His business record sucks, his record as governor sucks, his Olympic record is silly and his record as a public speaker is on a par with Sarah Palin. If the republicans really want to beat a completely beatable president they will dump this idiot at the convention.
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 27, 2012 3:56 PM GMT
    Romney doesn't like people questioning his experience with Bain because the details will expose him as a vulture capitalist and will expose the lies about his involvement with Bain during the years he claimed he didn't have any.

    But America is a government, not a corporation, so it shouldn't be run as such. Was Mitt successful when he had Massachusetts ranked 47th for job growth thoughout his career as governor? I think not.
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Jul 27, 2012 4:21 PM GMT
    smartmoney saidHis business record sucks, his record as governor sucks, his Olympic record is silly and his record as a public speaker is on a par with Sarah Palin. If the republicans really want to beat a completely beatable president they will dump this idiot at the convention.


    Puhleeeeaze, the republicans don't have anyone who could beat Obama! Nice try.icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 27, 2012 4:27 PM GMT
    If he's so beatable .....


    There'd be republicans lining up at the door
    Problem IS when you run for somepthin .... you gotta have something to RUN ON
    That's where republicans run into a problem
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 4:30 PM GMT
    GQjock saidIf he's so beatable .....


    There'd be republicans lining up at the door
    Problem IS when you run for somepthin .... you gotta have something to RUN ON
    That's where republicans run into a problem


    You mean "NO" is not enough of a reason to run on something?????

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif
  • GQjock

    Posts: 11649

    Jul 27, 2012 4:35 PM GMT
    GAMRican said
    GQjock saidIf he's so beatable .....


    There'd be republicans lining up at the door
    Problem IS when you run for somepthin .... you gotta have something to RUN ON
    That's where republicans run into a problem


    You mean "NO" is not enough of a reason to run on something?????

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif


    Well there needs to be some WORDS that follow No ......

    and this is the very problem that our friend the Mittster is running into right now
    Yeah we know that he disagrees with what Obama says
    It's the pregnant pauses after that he keeps stumblin on
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 4:45 PM GMT
    GQjock said
    GAMRican said
    GQjock saidIf he's so beatable .....


    There'd be republicans lining up at the door
    Problem IS when you run for somepthin .... you gotta have something to RUN ON
    That's where republicans run into a problem


    You mean "NO" is not enough of a reason to run on something?????

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif


    Well there needs to be some WORDS that follow No ......

    and this is the very problem that our friend the Mittster is running into right now
    Yeah we know that he disagrees with what Obama says
    It's the pregnant pauses after that he keeps stumblin on


    Stumblin on? More like stublin into bottomless vacuous caverns (kind of like the space between his ears...a vacuous cavern).
  • creature

    Posts: 5197

    Jul 27, 2012 4:52 PM GMT
    GQjock said
    GAMRican said
    GQjock saidIf he's so beatable .....


    There'd be republicans lining up at the door
    Problem IS when you run for somepthin .... you gotta have something to RUN ON
    That's where republicans run into a problem


    You mean "NO" is not enough of a reason to run on something?????

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif


    Well there needs to be some WORDS that follow No ......

    and this is the very problem that our friend the Mittster is running into right now
    Yeah we know that he disagrees with what Obama says
    It's the pregnant pauses after that he keeps stumblin on


    That's essentially Romney's problem.

    He has nothing of substance to present. No one can tell where he stands because he swings whichever way the wind blows. He has no leadership qualities. It's no surprise he remains uninspiring to most conservatives.