TODAY IN STUPID>>ROMNEY's retreads from Bush's failed PNAC backed IRAQ FIASCO

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 3:53 PM GMT
    Mitt Romney Foreign Policy Embraces War, Americans United For Change Says

    The Huffington Post | By Sabrina Siddiqui Posted: 07/24/2012 6:59 pm Updated: 07/24/2012 7:05 pm

    As Mitt Romney delivered his first major foreign policy speech in nine months on Tuesday, liberal advocacy group Americans United for Change released a web video targeting the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for naming foreign policy advisers who worked in President George W. Bush's administration during the unpopular Iraq War.

    The video spotlights members of Romney's foreign policy team who led the charge in Iraq, pointing to their miscalculations, false claims and so-called enhanced interrogation techniques.

    The video's overall message? "If you liked the war in Iraq, you'll love Mitt Romney's foreign policy."


    Take a good hard look at who is on Romney's Foreign Policy team and if you liked the results of Bush's Iraq failure you'll sure like Romney's team who are hell bent on taking us into yet another war, this time with Iran.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 4:12 PM GMT

    We're ready!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 7:14 PM GMT
    Stalking me again OLD GEEZER with your Bomb Iran vids ? at least this time its under cover so we don't have to look at the Christian Fundi's Idea of 'doing god's will' for Israel. ( i didn't look at your link but I'd say I'm right as to its content, or very close)
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 27, 2012 7:20 PM GMT
    I just took a look at your profile and noticed that you are also 58. If memory serves me correctly, you’ve been 58 a while longer than I have. So if I’m an old geezer, what’s that make you?

    Once again, Take a look right over my pic and you’ll see my screen name, which happens to be Freedomisntfree. Use it

    I'll even be a real gentlemen and help you with that link you're having trouble with:

    Pentagon’s 30,000-pound bunker-buster ‘superbomb’ ready for use

    Published: 26 July, 2012, 23:00
    Edited: 27 July, 2012, 03:31

    The biggest conventional bomb ever developed is ready to wreak destruction upon the enemies of the US. Air Force Secretary Michael Donley said its record-breaking bunker-buster has become operational after years of testing.

    ­“If it needed to go today, we would be ready to do that,” said Donley. “We continue to do testing on the bomb to refine its capabilities, and that is ongoing. We also have the capability to go with existing configuration today.”

    The Pentagon has spent $330 million to develop and deliver more than 20 of the precision-guided Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker-busters, which are designed to blast through up to 200 feet of concrete.

    Although there has previously been a bigger nuclear device, the new conventional rocket is six times the weight of the previous bunker-buster used by the US Air Force, and carries an explosive payload of 5,300 pounds.

    US military chiefs openly admitted the weapon was built to attack the fortified nuclear facilities of “rogue states” such as Iran and North Korea. Although the Pentagon insists that it is not aimed at a specific threat, unnamed officials within the ministry have repeatedly claimed the bomb is being tailor-made to disable Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, or at least to intimidate Tehran.

    Iran is working at breakneck speed to expand its Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is built inside a mountain in the heart of the country, and has previously been declared “impregnable” by senior officials in Tehran. Iran has often paraded its fast-advancing nuclear program, while denying that it intends to build a nuclear bomb.

    Earlier this year, the Pentagon rapidly diverted $120 million in two separate tranches from other weapons programs to MOPs. The money was transferred to significantly redesign and upgrade the precision-guided missile to provide “an enhanced threat response” against the “deepest bunkers.”

    Donley’s claim can be read as a reassertion of US determination to thwart Iran’s atomic ambitions.

    Whether the MOP would be able to actually destroy Fordo is open to debate and may not be known by either of the sides.

    The effectiveness of bunker-busters depends on the strength of the soil into which it plunges, how well it makes contact, and the internal structure of the facilities. In the case of Fordo, the US may only have a sketchy idea of its layout.

    At best, the US believes a successful strike could set the Iranian program back several years, and, at worst, to at least collapse the passageways to the facility and force substantial rebuilding work.

    Two bombs can be mounted simultaneously on a modified B-52 bomber, and a US official previously claimed the effectiveness of any operation would depend on how many “tries at the apple” the US bombers get.

    Nonetheless, even if the MOP can be of limited effectiveness against Iran, the United States has precious little alternative. The only other weapon capable of destroying such a facility from the air would be a tactical nuclear missile.