Teachers Unions Go to Bat for Sexual Predators

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 30, 2012 10:40 PM GMT
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443437504577547313612049308.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

    The system to review misconduct is rigged so even abusive teachers can stay on the job.

    By resisting almost any change aimed at improving our public schools, teachers unions have become a ripe target for reformers across the ideological spectrum. Even Hollywood, famously sympathetic to organized labor, has turned on unions with the documentary "Waiting for 'Superman'" (2010) and a feature film, "Won't Back Down," to be released later this year. But perhaps most damaging to the unions' credibility is their position on sexual misconduct involving teachers and students in New York schools, which is even causing union members to begin to lose faith.

    In the last five years in New York City, 97 tenured teachers or school employees have been charged by the Department of Education with sexual misconduct. Among the charges substantiated by the city's special commissioner of investigation—that is, found to have sufficient merit that an arbitrator's full examination was justified—in the 2011-12 school year:

    • An assistant principal at a Brooklyn high school made explicit sexual remarks to three different girls, including asking one of them if she would perform oral sex on him.

    • A teacher in Queens had a sexual relationship with a 13-year old girl and sent her inappropriate messages through email and Facebook.

    If this kind of behavior were happening in any adult workplace in America, there would be zero tolerance. Yet our public school children are defenseless.

    Here's why. Under current New York law, an accusation is first vetted by an independent investigator. (In New York City, that's the special commissioner of investigation; elsewhere in the state, it can be an independent law firm or the local school superintendent.) Then the case goes before an employment arbitrator. The local teachers union and school district together choose the arbitrators, who in turn are paid up to $1,400 per day. And therein lies the problem.

    For many arbitrators, their livelihood depends on pleasing the unions (whether the United Federation of Teachers in New York City, or other local unions). And the unions—believing that they are helping the cause of teachers by being weak on sexual predators—prefer suspensions and fines, and not dismissal, for teachers charged with inappropriate sexual conduct. The effects of this policy are mounting.

    One example: An arbitrator in 2007 found that teacher Alexis Grullon had victimized young girls with repeated hugging, "incidental though not accidental contact with one student's breast" and "sexually suggestive remarks." The teacher had denied all these charges. In the end the arbitrator found him "unrepentant," yet punished him with only a six-month suspension.
  • KissTheSky

    Posts: 1981

    Jul 31, 2012 3:25 AM GMT
    You have got to be the only Canadian who gives a shit about the minutiae of New York State teacher's arbitration policies.
    Some teacher may or may not have been doing some "inappropriate" hugging and gets suspended for six months... and you're losing sleep about this?
    Shouldn't you be fighting the evils of Socialized medicine in your own country?
    icon_rolleyes.gificon_rolleyes.gif
  • Webster666

    Posts: 9217

    Jul 31, 2012 3:47 AM GMT
    "THERE YOU GO AGAIN !"

    ONE PERSON WRITES AN EDITORIAL, AND YOU SPREAD IT AS IF IT WERE NEWS.

    AND, YOU CHOSE TO GIVE IT A HIGHLY SENSATIONAL THREAD TITLE.

    YOU SHOULD WORK FOR THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

    STOP SPAMMING THE FORUMS WITH YOUR BULLSHIT.


    oszbxz.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 31, 2012 6:55 AM GMT
    Look closer to home. The National Post ran an article on March 21,2012 about the Canada's lack of will to stop predators. Once you get your house in order, let us know.