Mitt is in the shit in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2012 1:46 AM GMT
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/01/polls-obama-over-50-in-florida-ohio-and-pennsylvania/?iref=obnetwork

    Obama is now leading in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
    Looks like Mitt is in the shit.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2012 2:06 AM GMT
    The important part of these poll results is the fact that President Obama is over 50% in these crucial battleground states.
    Romney has never been able to get much over 45%.

    There's also only a tiny sliver of undecided voters left - and even if Romney got all of them (which is very unlikely) - he'd still lose.

  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Aug 08, 2012 2:41 AM GMT
    Duh. Americans are not going to elect the tax cheat, Mitt Romney.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2012 2:45 AM GMT
    bwahahaha!

    good luck winning the election without especially carrying ohio and florida.

    but you didn't have much of a chance anyway mittens, not sorry to say icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2012 2:57 AM GMT
    This is really surprising, because I always thought Americans were stupid.

    Maybe I was wrong. icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2012 3:30 AM GMT
    FriendlyJock02 saidSorry to put a damper on the party. Did you read the comments on the link. One person pointed out something you should all take note of:

    This is the same poll that in 2010 said that the Republicans would pick up 7 to 10 seats in the House and 3 or 4 Senate seats. And how did that work out?






    HAHAHA

    I hate to put a damper on your delusional dreaming - but a non-partisan fact-based analysis of the final poll predictions that were made by all the major pollsters for the 2010 election - was done right after the actual result numbers came in for the 2010 election.

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/rasmussen-polls-were-biased-and-inaccurate-quinnipiac-surveyusa-performed-strongly/

    The poll predictions made by all the pollsters were compared to the actual final result numbers and rated for accuracy and for any bias.

    The Quinnipiac poll prediction for 2010 was rated as the MOST ACCURATE of all the pollsters.

    So the claim that you cite that the Quinnipiac polls were wrong in 2010 is TOTAL BULLSHIT.

    BTW - the pollster that was found to be the least accurate and most biased was the right-wing Rasmussen.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2012 3:37 AM GMT
    Pennsylvania was NEVER within Romney's reach, anyway. A few outlier polls may have shown him within the margin of error or close to it, but that's all they were: outliers.