just watched this a few hours ago actually, i think Brown and Savage both presented their arguments well. they both definitely believe what they're saying is true. however, Brown is fundamentally wrong, plain and simple and the "two sides of humanity" argument is clearly a cop out.
Brown instead of disregarding people with a different view (perhaps atheist), he instead invokes the "human" aspect of marriage, as if its a natural invention (oxymoron i know), saying its intrinsically 1 man/ 1 women, what he doesn't take into account is the fact that marriage exist in every society and the monolith of it is completely dependent on the society in which its based upon.
Browns argument seems more emotional and less logically and factually based... clearly New York has fallen off the map by now
I, objectively, agree with Dan Savage.
idk, just my tree fiddy...