My dear Avalon,
Actually, no, for technical reasons this is the only place in the universe where this topic can be discussed. I am really terribly sorry.
Certainly your reticence to have YOUR topic derailed is perfectly understandable, given that YOUR topic does concern an issue vital to the survival of our and all other species.
That said, I think a discussion involving baseball bats, roofies, copious quantities of alcohol, unsafe sex, shit encrusted cocks, and other assorted odds-and-ends is perfectly germane to YOUR topic.
However, since YOU seem to have been born without the gene for connected thought, I can speak more precisely to your subject:
a.) I have never fucked a straight guy, because the definition of straight guy actually precludes fucking other men. Ergo, if I fucked him, he ain't straight. I have fucked assorted dingleberries who claimed they were straight, at least they did so long as their throat wasn't stuffed with my cock.
b.) I have fucked bi-guys and find them no different (better-or-worse) "in-the-sack" (what a ludicrous term - who would sleep in a sack? Who would fuck in one? Who would hit one? Why would anyone hit a sack?) than any other human being.
c.) My experience to date is that how one fucks bears no relation whatsoever to whom one fucks.
d.) The definitions, straight, gay, bi, transgendered, and whatever else, also in my experience (including being fucked up the ass by female-to-male transexuals) are so meaningless as to be laughable.
My conclusion is that the nature of the topic is entirely expository about its originator whom I reckon to be somewhat of a suppository.
Is that adequately on topic?
Avalon60 saidRBY71, mnjock and usamajor - can you have that conversation somewhere else please so that this stays on topic?