Not A Good Time To Piss Off The Clinton's

  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    Oct 13, 2012 3:51 PM GMT
    With Obama's re-election chances hanging in the balance, this would not be the time to piss off Bill & Hillary...

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/12/the-clinton-obama-rift/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 3:53 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidWith Obama's re-election chances hanging in the balance, this would not be the time to piss off Bill & Hillary...

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/12/the-clinton-obama-rift/


    Wonder if Dick Morris is correct ...... that Bill will vote for Romney?
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    Oct 13, 2012 4:03 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    CuriousJockAZ saidWith Obama's re-election chances hanging in the balance, this would not be the time to piss off Bill & Hillary...

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/12/the-clinton-obama-rift/


    Wonder if Dick Morris is correct ...... that Bill will vote for Romney?




    If Hillary truly has plans to run, she may have better chances after 4 years of Romney than 8 years of Obama. I seriously don't think she's going to run. She just seems way to tired to have to begin a major Presidential run and all that includes in 2 years
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14303

    Oct 13, 2012 5:02 PM GMT
    This would be a great time to piss off the Clintons. It would make this election more entertaining, more interesting.icon_lol.gif
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Oct 13, 2012 5:07 PM GMT
    If Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 5:12 PM GMT
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???)


    Yes it has. Obama kept Bush appointee Robert Gates on as Defense Secretary.
  • comfortablynu...

    Posts: 230

    Oct 13, 2012 5:24 PM GMT
    This must be why Clinton is still stumping and fundraising for Obama...
  • comfortablynu...

    Posts: 230

    Oct 13, 2012 5:25 PM GMT
    Bill Clinton and Bruce Springsteen in Ohio for an Obama rally next week, that should be a good one.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 5:28 PM GMT
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif


    I don't often agree with you, but sure do on this one. I would fully support that, but I really do think she's wants out.
  • KissTheSky

    Posts: 1980

    Oct 13, 2012 5:51 PM GMT
    Fabricated gossip from a conservative website.

    Bill Clinton is actively campaigning for Obama across the country, and has probably helped his re-election bid more than any other single person.

    This is hardly my idea of a "feud."
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Oct 13, 2012 6:40 PM GMT
    KissTheSky saidFabricated gossip from a conservative website.

    Bill Clinton is actively campaigning for Obama across the country, and has probably helped his re-election bid more than any other single person.

    This is hardly my idea of a "feud."


    Too bad he can't debate for Obama.icon_confused.gif

    Hopefully, Obama will be able to step up his game next time. No one can do that for him.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 6:44 PM GMT
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif


    LOL! haha Like the GOP actually wants to help america. They just want to hurt women, hispanics, non-conservatives and gays.
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Oct 13, 2012 6:59 PM GMT
    GonzoTheGreat said
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif


    LOL! haha Like the GOP actually wants to help america. They just want to hurt women, hispanics, non-conservatives and gays.


    Hey, I have to work with these people lol.

    Although Hillary Clinton has been a lightening rod of controversy in the past, I think in her role as Secretary of State she's proven she can do an outstanding job of showing the world that America has strength and values, and the resolve to uphold those values. She's very credible (even Paul Ryan mentioned her in the debates as someone he agrees with on key foreign policy issues).

    I'm obviously voting for Obama, however, as the race tightens, I can't help but want to be able to respond with fresh ideas to any possible outcome.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    Oct 13, 2012 7:01 PM GMT
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif



    I agree, but I don't think Hillary wants to stay on as Secretary of State even if Obama wins. The woman needs, and deserves, a break. The person I would like to see as Secretary of State if Romney wins is Jon Huntsman
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 7:10 PM GMT
    HottJoe said
    GonzoTheGreat said
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif


    LOL! haha Like the GOP actually wants to help america. They just want to hurt women, hispanics, non-conservatives and gays.


    Hey, I have to work with these people lol.

    Although Hillary Clinton has been a lightening rod of controversy in the past, I think in her role as Secretary of State she's proven she can do an outstanding job of showing the world that America has strength and values, and the resolve to uphold those values. She's very credible (even Paul Ryan mentioned her in the debates as someone he agrees with on key foreign policy issues).

    I'm obviously voting for Obama, however, as the race tightens, I can't help but want to be able to respond with fresh ideas to any possible outcome.


    And we'll do what we can to provide you with that 'possible' outcome, but nevertheless, good attitude. I still don't think its gonna happen though.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 7:11 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif



    I agree, but I don't think Hillary wants to stay on as Secretary of State even if Obama wins. The woman needs, and deserves, a break. The person I would like to see as Secretary of State if Romney wins is Jon Huntsman


    I'll take another john.

    John Bolton.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14303

    Oct 13, 2012 9:03 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    HottJoe saidIf Romney were to win, it would be a great bipartisan move to keep Hillary Clinton on as Secretary of State. I doubt that he would (has anything like that ever been done???), but she's very good at her job, and I think she'd be a respectable, popular choice, even for a republican.icon_idea.gif



    I agree, but I don't think Hillary wants to stay on as Secretary of State even if Obama wins. The woman needs, and deserves, a break. The person I would like to see as Secretary of State if Romney wins is Jon Huntsman
    Jon Huntsman would be a very good choice regardless whether Romney or Obama wins in November.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    Oct 13, 2012 9:06 PM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidJon Huntsman would be a very good choice regardless whether Romney or Obama wins in November.



    Obama would never pick Huntsman since Huntsman threw Obama under the bus after stepping down as China ambassador
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 13, 2012 10:49 PM GMT
    HA ! Have you heard Jon Huntsman speak of Romney lately?

    HE HAS NO RESPECT FOR ROMNEY-----and makes that clear whenever the question arises.

    Yeah, Romney is more likely to pic Bolton.
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Oct 14, 2012 1:35 AM GMT
    A bunch of right-wing wishful thinking, trying to drive a wedge between the Obama's and the Clintons when there just isn't one.

    One, Bill was and is happily campaigning for Obama. Hillary will resign once Obama wins re-election as she has always said she would do, and she will step down without scandal or incident, as one of the most successful Secretaries of State in history.

    Two, there's nothing to even have a rift over in the first place: the "denied security requested" conservatives keeps harping on WASN'T FOR THE BENGHAZI COMPOUND. It was for Tripoli, some 400 miles away. So even if the request had been granted, it wouldn't have made ANY difference. State Department officials explained all this to Congress this week, which is why Romney/Ryan's foreign policy attacks pivoted today from Libya to China. There's just nothing there except Teabaggers trying to manufacture a scandal.

    The Republicans here would do better if they stopped posting gossip from fringe right-wing websites. But we all know facts don't matter to the right.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    Oct 14, 2012 3:27 PM GMT
    TroyAthlete said
    The Republicans here would do better if they stopped posting gossip from fringe right-wing websites. But we all know facts don't matter to the right.


    And you would do better if you stop acting like you're some expert with an inside track to The Clinton's. Republicans don't need to listen to gossip in regards to the Libya incident --- we can listen to the congressional hearings. icon_wink.gif
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Oct 14, 2012 5:40 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    TroyAthlete said
    The Republicans here would do better if they stopped posting gossip from fringe right-wing websites. But we all know facts don't matter to the right.


    And you would do better if you stop acting like you're some expert with an inside track to The Clinton's. Republicans don't need to listen to gossip in regards to the Libya incident --- we can listen to the congressional hearings. icon_wink.gif


    And you should stop acting like you know who I know and what track I'm on. You don't know who I know in Chappaqua, at the Clinton Foundation, or in D.C., or who I keep in touch with from my work on the Clinton campaign in 2007-2008. Whatever I know or don't know, I'm almost 100% certain I know more inside information about Clinton, Inc. than you do.

    And if you had listened to the Congressional hearings -- which you clearly did not -- then you would have known that the security request was not even made for the compound in question, and you would therefore not be beating this dead horse.

    So like I said, rather than speculating about that which you have no clue based on gossip from right-wing websites, you would do better to follow the Romney campaign's lead and pivot to actual issues. Or not. While y'all are busy waiting for the Clinton's to be pissed off over nothing, Obama will be busy collecting 270 electoral votes.
  • musclmed

    Posts: 3274

    Oct 14, 2012 6:05 PM GMT
    TroyAthlete said
    CuriousJockAZ said
    TroyAthlete said
    The Republicans here would do better if they stopped posting gossip from fringe right-wing websites. But we all know facts don't matter to the right.


    And you would do better if you stop acting like you're some expert with an inside track to The Clinton's. Republicans don't need to listen to gossip in regards to the Libya incident --- we can listen to the congressional hearings. icon_wink.gif


    And you should stop acting like you know who I know and what track I'm on. You don't know who I know in Chappaqua, at the Clinton Foundation, or in D.C., or who I keep in touch with from my work on the Clinton campaign in 2007-2008. Whatever I know or don't know, I'm almost 100% certain I know more inside information about Clinton, Inc. than you do.

    And if you had listened to the Congressional hearings -- which you clearly did not -- then you would have known that the security request was not even made for the compound in question, and you would therefore not be beating this dead horse.

    So like I said, rather than speculating about that which you have no clue based on gossip from right-wing websites, you would do better to follow the Romney campaign's lead and pivot to actual issues. Or not. While y'all are busy waiting for the Clinton's to be pissed off over nothing, Obama will be busy collecting 270 electoral votes.



    If you are a "insider" it puts everything in context. Why would 1 word of anything you said be counted as a personal opinion and not a party talking point.

    It swings both ways. If you counter a argument by saying " i know inside information" then you are a insider, and BIASED.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19119

    Oct 15, 2012 3:54 AM GMT
    musclmed said
    If you are a "insider" it puts everything in context. Why would 1 word of anything you said be counted as a personal opinion and not a party talking point.

    It swings both ways. If you counter a argument by saying " i know inside information" then you are a insider, and BIASED.


    Yes, musclmed, Troyassholete has tea with Hillary every other Thursday --- so he's VERY in the know. icon_rolleyes.gif
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Oct 15, 2012 6:40 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ said
    musclmed said
    If you are a "insider" it puts everything in context. Why would 1 word of anything you said be counted as a personal opinion and not a party talking point.

    It swings both ways. If you counter a argument by saying " i know inside information" then you are a insider, and BIASED.


    Yes, musclmed, Troyassholete has tea with Hillary every other Thursday --- so he's VERY in the know. icon_rolleyes.gif


    LaughingStockAZ with his over the top lies again. You guys really need to learn the difference between "I am an insider" and "I have more inside information than YOU." Although I say that knowing that subtlety of thought and reading comprehension are not Republicans' strong suits.

    The fact remains that this right-wing gossip about a rift over Libya is total bunk, much like all the other dog poo that comes out of LaughingStockAZ.