Blakes7 saidDidn't he submit to hundreds of random drug tests, and passed every one? I hate to see someone tried and convicted in the unreliable news media.
You can't be caught if there's no test for whatever you're using. Johann Muhlegg got away with murder at Salt Lake city because there was no test for the drugs he was using - until the last race, when the test finally came out. At that point the head of the International Ski Association stopped the test and said there was "no time." Muhlegg was stupid enough to win, and that mandated testing, and wham!
But Armstrong has not been convicted by the press. He's been accused by 30-some witnesses. Moreover, at the time, many of us in the sports world knew he was doping: a) the things you heard, and b) (like Muhlegg) you just can't do all that.