why so little pics off the legs and butts ?

  • brotherrex

    Posts: 6

    Sep 02, 2008 11:11 AM GMT
    Why so little pics off the legs and butts ? Aren't there no muscles to show ?
    You could make nice pics in swimsuites and jockstraps, doesn't have to be naked.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 02, 2008 11:41 AM GMT
    12200621_740d218a53.jpg
  • brotherrex

    Posts: 6

    Sep 02, 2008 11:45 AM GMT
    Sedative said12200621_740d218a53.jpg



    Even here no ham, only ribs again !!! strange world
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14380

    Sep 02, 2008 5:15 PM GMT
    It would be nice to see some hot leg and ass views but I guess most realjock members are a bit too conservative so it is the usual ubiquitous frontal views.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 02, 2008 7:29 PM GMT
    I saw fresh Pork Butt in Chinatown yesterday but I'm thinking you're suggesting men's anatomy, not Pig's.

    In all seriousness, I guess a lot of our imagery underscores our upper bodies because they're the most visible. Moreover, we usually measure strength by the size of our biceps and chest when in fact quadriceps are our biggest muscles. This is unfortunate, a guy with nice legs and a defined ass is HOT!
  • TexanMan82

    Posts: 893

    Sep 03, 2008 12:15 AM GMT
    It's because hardly any guys work them. Shame, too. Nothing hotter, in my opinion, than a nice athletic man with the legs to match. It's quite disappointing to see a guy who has a nice torso standing on chicken legs.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 03, 2008 12:47 AM GMT

    I'd say that it is because, just showing legs and butts is just showing parts and more people want to be viewed as an athlete, bodybuilder, weightlifter...whatever they are without being degraded to a piece of meat.
    Besides, with a good torso pic, the face is visible and that is very important. I'm here to show that I am a proud gay athlete. You guys can already guess I have a gay ass. But, if you insist, perhaps RealJock can inact a policy like DudesNude did that one or more of your pictures have too be full body, head to toe shots. I'm ok with a nice torso with the face visible, but a full body shot is always a welcome sight, gives you the whole big picture. But, aha, I've found them few and far between: guys who won't show you their ass and legs on cam if you ask politely.
  • brotherrex

    Posts: 6

    Sep 03, 2008 8:43 AM GMT
    just most pics are just till the middle, or just chests. I know mine too, new ones are in review. But when someon is just showing the arms or the tors that would be the same thing, it's also pretty partial. So I see no difference here.
    Thanks already for the replies.