Many HIV patients skip medications to drink: study

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 04, 2012 1:23 AM GMT
    http://news.yahoo.com/many-hiv-patients-skip-medications-drink-study-000057507.html

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 04, 2012 11:15 AM GMT
    a study with 178 persons is hardly reliable
  • calibro

    Posts: 8888

    Nov 04, 2012 1:16 PM GMT
    thorn27 saida study with 178 persons is hardly reliable


    that's not true at all.

    "The estimator of a proportion is hat p = X/n, where X is the number of 'positive' observations (e.g. the number of people out of the n sampled people who are at least 65 years old). When the observations are independent, this estimator has a (scaled) binomial distribution (and is also the sample mean of data from a Bernoulli distribution). The maximum variance of this distribution is 0.25*n, which occurs when the true parameter is p = 0.5. In practice, since p is unknown, the maximum variance is often used for sample size assessments.

    For sufficiently large n, the distribution of hat{p} will be closely approximated by a normal distribution with the same mean and variance.[1] Using this approximation, it can be shown that around 95% of this distribution's probability lies within 2 standard deviations of the mean. Because of this, an interval of the form

    (hat p -2sqrt{0.25/n}, hat p +2sqrt{0.25/n})

    will form a 95% confidence interval for the true proportion. If this interval needs to be no more than W units wide, the equation

    4sqrt{0.25/n} = W

    can be solved for n, yielding[2][3] n = 4/W2 = 1/B2 where B is the error bound on the estimate, i.e., the estimate is usually given as within ± B. So, for B = 10% one requires n = 100, for B = 5% one needs n = 400, for B = 3% the requirement approximates to n = 1000, while for B = 1% a sample size of n = 10000 is required. These numbers are quoted often in news reports of opinion polls and other sample surveys."
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 04, 2012 1:29 PM GMT
    thorn27 saida study with 178 persons is hardly reliable



    Confidence Level: 99%
    Sample Size: 178
    Population: 34,000,000
    Percentage: 51

    Confidence Interval: 9.67

    icon_eek.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 04, 2012 2:02 PM GMT
    Abstracting up. The more important point here is "adherence to treatment regimen". And, this is not a new issue.

    People may have a second chance at long full life if they go on anti-retroviral therapy.

    People may blow that chance if they do not stick to their treatment regimen.

    There are all kinds of "tips and tricks" on how to improve adherence to regimen. Something as simple as setting recurring reminders on your smartphone or other clock can help with remembering the correct time.
    Keeping dosages with you at all times is a great way to not be without your meds when your dosage time comes.
    There are all kinds of approaches.

    From my observations as a board member of a nonprofit HIV/AIDS services organizations, the homeless and the mentally ill have the hardest time with adherence regimen.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 04, 2012 2:07 PM GMT
    GAMRican saidAbstracting up. The more important point here is "adherence to treatment regimen". And, this is not a new issue.

    People may have a second chance at long full life if they go on anti-retroviral therapy.

    People may blow that chance if they do not stick to their treatment regimen.

    There are all kinds of "tips and tricks" on how to improve adherence to regimen. Something as simple as setting recurring reminders on your smartphone or other clock can help with remembering the correct time.
    Keeping dosages with you at all times is a great way to not be without your meds when your dosage time comes.
    There are all kinds of approaches.

    From my observations as a board member of a nonprofit HIV/AIDS services organizations, the homeless and the mentally ill have the hardest time with adherence regimen.

    ditto - add vulnerable populations (undereducated; unemployed - meaning almost 100% of clients - and those with addictions. In my own experience, Single persons have more difficulty with adherence than those in a relationship with someone).